Objective To systematically evaluate the influence of PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) ultrasound guidance on success rates and incidences of complications of elbow catheterization. Methods The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2012), Library of JBI evidence-based nursing center, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched for relevant studies to influence on success rates of puncture and catheterization and complications from upper arm placement of PICC ultrasound guidance as well as conventional PICC placement from inception to March, 2012. The data were extracted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers, the quality of included studies was also evaluated. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1, or only descriptive analysis was conducted instead. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials, five clinical controlled trials and four cohort studies were included, involving 4 052 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, upper arm placement of PICC ultrasound guidance combined with modified Seldinger technique was associated with significantly higher one-time success rates of puncture and catheterization than conventional PICC placement below the elbow, with significant differences (OR=4.71, 95%CI 1.97 to 11.28, P=0.000 5; OR=8.63, 95%CI 1.92 to 38.82, P=0.005). Conventional elbow catheterization had a significantly higher incidence of phlebitis than catheterization on the elbow that under the guidance of PICC ultrasound and modified Seldinger technique (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.21, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Elbow catheterization under the guidance of PICC ultrasound combined with modified Seldinger technique has an obvious advantage in improving the success rates of puncture and catheterization and reducing the incidence of complications, compared with conventional elbow catheterization.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of second central venous catheterization in tunnel cuffed dialysis catheter (TCC) dysfunction with fibrin sheath.MethodA total of 14 maintenance hemodialysis patients who required second central venous catheterization were enrolled in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2016 to June 2017 and the clinical information and procedure-related complications were recorded.ResultsAll of the 14 patients were successfully performed with second central venous catheterization, of whom 4 cases had superior vena cava cannulation, 7 cases had right brachiocephalic vein cannulation, 2 cases had internal jugular vein cannulation, and 1 case had external jugular vein cannulation. No procedure-related major complication occurred. During the follow-up, catheter malfunction occurred in 2 cases, which improved by urokinase seal and catheter change, respectively. The rest patients’ catheter function remained normal.ConclusionsWith increasing difficult to construction and maintenance of vascular access, preservation of central vein resource is of high importance. For patients with TCC dysfunction with fibrin sheath, second central venous catheterization based on percutaneous brachiocephalic vein or superior vena cava cannulation is a safe and effective method to establish the lifeline for hemodialysis patients.
Abstract： Objective To analyze clinical outcomes of interventional therapy for common congenital heart diseases （CHD）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 57 patients with CHD who underwent catheter interventional therapy in People’s Hospital of Deyang City between March 2009 and January 2012. There were 31 male patients and 26 female patients with their mean age of 29.4±3.5 years（ranging from 1.5 to 75.0 years）. There were 21 patients with patent ductus arteriosus （PDA）, 12 patients with ventricular septal defect （VSD）, and 20 patients with atrial septal defect（ASD）；and 2 patients with VSD plus ASD, 1 patient with VSD plus PDA, and 1 patient with ASD plus PDA. Occluder and supplying system made in China were used in the interventional therapy. For the patients with ASD plus PDA, PDA was blocked before ASD；for the patients with VSD plus PDA, PDA was blocked before VSD；and for the patients with VSD plus ASD, VSD was blocked before ASD. Results The duration of interventional therapy ranged from 30 to 90 minutes. The success rate of operation was 98.3%（56/57）. Operation was given up in an old female patient with ASD and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease because of pulmonary hypertension. The hospital stay was 3 -7 days. All the patients were followed up at the outpatient department for 1 month to 2 years by color Doppler echocardiogram, chest X-ray and electrocardiograph, and no complication occurred during follow-up. Conclusion With complete understanding of surgical indications and strict compliance with procedures, catheter interventional therapy is safe, minimal invasive, and effective in CHD treatment.
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of selective angiography and embolization treatment in massive biliary hemorrhage in emergency. Methods Eleven cases of massive biliary bleeding were selectively angiographied and embolized with thread segment and gelatin sponge grain by Seldinger technique in emergency. Results Massive biliary bleeding in this series included bleeding after biliary surgery (7), post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy bleeding (1), bleeding from traumatic injury to liver (1), and rupture of huge hepatic cancer (2). There were 9 cases with abnormal angiographic findings including contrast medium leakage (9), tumor vessels and tumor tissue staining (2) and signs of pseudo-aneurysm formation (4). All the bleedings were stopped after emergency intervention but 2 cases with recurrent massive bleeding after 48 hours. Conclusion Emergency trans-catheter embolization treatment is an effective and safe method for biliary massive hemorrhage. It is also important to keep the biliary tract unobstructed.
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from inception to July 1st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 12 cohort studies involving 4 051 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there were no differences in the rate of thromboembolic (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.36 to 2.35, P=0.86), ischemic stroke (OR=1.15, 95%CI 0.22 to 6.07, P=0.87), major bleeding (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.66, P=0.61), minor bleeding (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.60 to 1.34, P=0.60) and pericardial tamponade (OR=1.05, 95%CI 0.45 to 2.47, P=0.90) between dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups. ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are similar. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of low-(10 mg) and high-dose (20 mg) of recombinant tissue typeplasminogen activator (rt-PA) catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia by using meta-analysis. MethodsThe literatures of randomized clinical trials (RCT) concerning low-versus high-dose rt-PA catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia study were searched using the national and international electronic databases.The literatures were screened and quality evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed by using the Cochrane Center the RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCT studies, with a total of 360 patients (192 patients in low dose group and 168 patients in high-dose group) were included.No statistical difference were noted in low-versus high-dose group with regard to ankle-brachial index (RR=0.20, 95%CI=-0.43-0.02, P=0.07), 30 days amputation-free survival (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.94-1.08, P=0.91), 6 months the probability of restenosis (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.60-1.67, P=1.00), and the incidence of groin hematoma (< 5 cm, RR=1.24, 95%CI=0.56-2.77, P=0.59).But the incidence of bleeding and the incidence of stress ulcer in low-dose group were lower than those in high-dose group (RR=2.38, 95%CI=1.10-5.15, P=0.03;RR=2.49, 95%CI=1.21-5.13, P=0.01). ConclusionTwo doses of rt-PA treatment of limb ischemia similar efficacy, but the incidence of low-dose regimen of complications is significantly lower than the high dose regimen.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the influence for catheter mechanical dysfunction of different peritoneal dialysis catheterization methods.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on comparisons of different peritoneal dialysis catheterization from inception to March 31st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using ADDIS 1.16.6 software.ResultsA total of 33 studies (9 RCTs and 24 cohort studies) involving 3 301 patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that the incidence of catheter mechanical dysfunctionwas the least and had statistically significant difference compared with that in percutaneous catheterization (OR=3.60; 95%CI, 1.64 and 15.38) and open surgery catheterization (OR=5.86; 95%CI, 2.68 and 14.53). Percutaneous catheterization was superior to open surgery catheterization, but there was no significant difference.ConclusionsLaparoscopic catheterization may be the best technique for catheter insertion in peritoneal dialysis considering catheter dysfunction. Each technology has its own advantages. Choice of insertion method should be based on the characteristics of both the patient and the insertion techniques.
ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of simultaneous culture of central venous catheter (CVC) blood and peripheral blood for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). MethodsNon-septic patients who were treated with CVC for 1 to 7 days were enrolled from February 2011 to February 2015 in the First Hospital of Wuhan City. Blood were collected from both peripheral vein and CVC for bacterial culture once a day. The CVCs were removed from patients who got CRBSI from the first to sixth day and who did not by the end of the seventh day for semi-quantitative catheter culture, quantitative catheter culture, CVC culture and catheter exit-site pus culture. The diagnosis of CRBSI were based on 4 methods as follows:A, both peripheral and CVC blood were positive and the time of CVC blood positive were 2 hours earlier than peripheral blood; B, the colonies of semi-quantitative catheter cultures were ≥15 CFU and the microorganisms in both CVC and peripheral blood were the same; C, the colonies ratio of CVC and peripheral blood cultures were ≥5:1; D, the microorganisms in both the peripheral blood and catheter exit-site pus were the same. The diagnostic value of the four methods was compared. ResultsA total of 1 086 patients were finally included. From 1 to 7 days, 64 patients were peripheral blood positive, 79 were CVC blood positive. The patients diagnosed as CRBSI using A, B, C, and D methods were 58, 55, 51, and 36, respectively. Sixty patients were diagnosed as CRBSI based on the clinical and laboratory methods. For the number of patients diagnosed with CRBSI, there was no significant difference between A and B (P>0.05), as well as A and C (P>0.05), however, significant difference was found between A and D (P<0.05). In the diagnostic value of CRBSI, A is similar to B (sensitivity:93.33% vs. 91.67%, specificity:99.81% vs. 100%, Youden index:0.93 vs. 0.92). A, B and C had almost similar specificity (all >99%), however, A had higher sensitivity (93.33% vs. 76.67%, 58.33%) and Youden index (0.93 vs. 0.76, 0.58). ConclusionSimultaneous culture of CVC blood and peripheral blood has a good diagnostic value for CRBSI.
ObjectiveTo investigate the incidence and trendency of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) of a hospital, identify the main objectives of infection control, and formulate corresponding preventive and control measures.MethodsA prospective targeted monitoring method was adopted to investigate HAIs in the pediatric ICU of a hospital from January 2013 to December 2018.ResultsFrom January 2013 to December 2018, the number of target ICU patients was 11 898, the number of patient-days was 55 159; 226 HAIs occurred, the HAI case rate was 1.90%, the incidence of HAI per 1 000 patient-days was 4.10‰, and the adjusted incidence of HAI per 1 000 patient-days was 1.21‰. The main infection site was respiratory tract [83 cases (36.7%)], with ventilator-associated pneumonia in 73 cases (32.3%); secondly, 69 patients (30.5%) had bloodstream infection, among which 48 (21.2%) had non-catheter-related bloodstream infection.ConclusionHospital targeted monitoring is helpful to grasp the situation and trend of HAIs, define the main target of infection control, and formulate corresponding preventive and control measures, which can effectively reduce the incidence of HAIs.
Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is widely used as an intravenous therapy pathway, and catheter occlusion is one of the most common complications during the use of PICC. Catheter occlusion may lead to extubation or re-catheterization, which may generate prolonged hospital stay and increased medical costs, thus affecting the implementation of treatment and patient prognosis. The prevention and treatment of occlusion are of great significance. Daily maintenance and nursing operations should be complete, standardized and implemented in place. Evidence-based standard procedures should be established to meet the needs of clinical work. This consensus follows the methods and principles provided in the WHO guidelines formulation manual, and forms a systematic and standardized clinical practice process, including PICC patency assessment, catheter occlusion degree and type assessment, risk factor prevention, blockage management, etc. The purpose of this consensus is to reduce catheter-related complications, ensure the longevity of PICC and the safety of patient treatment.