west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Cervical spinal canal stenosis" 3 results
  • COMBINED CERVICAL POSTERIOR-ANTERIOR OPERATION FOR TREATMENT OF CERVICAL SPINAL CANAL STENOSIS WITH REVERSE ARCH

    Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of combined posterior decompression with laminoplasty and anterior decompression with fusion for the treatment of cervical spinal canal stenosis with reverse arch. Methods Between May 2009 and February 2012, 13 cases of cervical spinal canal stenosis with reverse arch underwent posterior decompression with laminoplasty surgery in prone position and then anterior decompression with fusion surgery in supine position. There were 7 males and 6 females with an average age of 43.5 years (range, 38-62 years) and an average disease duration of 25 months (range, 18-60 months). All the patients had neck axial symptoms and spinal cord compressed symptoms, and lateral computer radiology (CR) of the neck showed reverse arch of cervical vertebrae. Segments of intervertebral disc protrusion included C3-6 in 4 cases, C4-7 in 4 cases, and C3-7 in 5 cases. After operation, anteroposterior and lateral CR was used to observe the cervical curvature change and fixation loosening, MRI to observe the change of the compression on spinal cord, visual analogue scale (VAS) score to evaluate the improvement of axial symptom, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score to assess the nerve function improvement. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 9-32 months (mean, 15.4 months). Internal fixator had good position without loosening or breaking and the compression on spinal cord improved significantly after operation. All the patients obtained bony fusion at 6 months after operation. The axial symptoms and the nerve function at last follow-up were improved. VAS score at last follow-up (3.25 ± 1.54) was significantly lower than that at preoperation (6.55 ± 1.52) (P lt; 0.05); JOA score at last follow-up (10.45 ± 4.23) was significantly higher than that at preoperation (7.05 ± 1.32) (P lt; 0.05); and cervical curvature value at last follow-up [(6.53 ± 3.12) mm] was significantly higher than that at preoperation [(3.22 ± 5.15) mm] (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Combined posterior decompression with laminoplasty and anterior decompression with fusion for the treatment of cervical spinal canal stenosis with reverse arch is a safe and effective surgical method.

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • FLAVECTOMY OF CERVICAL VERTEBRAE IN TREATING CERVICAL SPINAL CANAL STENOSIS

    Objective To investigate the operational method of cervical vertebral flavectomy and its cl inical appl ication in the management of cervical canal stenosis.  Methods From June 1997 to June 2007, 25 patients suffering from cervical spinal canal stenosis caused by obvious flaval l igament hypertrophy were given flavectomy. There were 22 males and 3 females, with an age range of 32 to 68 years (average 54 years). The course of disease was from 3 weeks to 7 years, with an average of 3 years and 7 months. All patients had degenerative cervical canal stenosis; of them, 5 cases had a history of cervical injury 2 to 3 weeks before operation (3 cases of fall ing injury and 2 cases of traffic accident injury). The X-ray film, CT, and MRI examinations showed that the compression locations were C4-7 in 12 cases, C3-7 in 9 cases, C5-7 in 3 cases, and C6,7 in 1 case. Spinous process and vertebral lamella were exposed by central posterior approach. The insertions of flaval l igaments were cut off at the superior vertebral lamella border, then the starting points of which were cut down from the anterior side of the upper vertebral lamella at their inferior border after l ifting up the flaval l igaments. The residual flaval l igaments in front of the vertebral lamella were scraped off by slope rongeur, the dura mater then could be seen to inflate from the intervertebral lamella space, showing the compression having been rel ieved. Twenty-five cases were all given posterior flavectomy. At 1 week to 3 months after operation, 12 patients received anterior cervical discectomy or vertebral gaining decompression with fusion by bone graft.  Results  The time for flavectomy was from 60 to 180 minutes, with an average of 95 minutes. The blood loss during operation was from 90 to 360 mL, with an average of 210 mL. The dura maters were lacerated by knife tips during operation with the cervical vertebrae in hyperflexion in 2 cases. Immediate suture and repair were performed and there were no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. All the incisions healed by first intension after operation. All of the 25 cases were followed up from 2 to 10 years, with an average of 3 years and 9 months. All patients had no compl ication of axial symptoms, and no restenosis at their operation site of cervical canal stenosis. The section area ratios of functional spinal canal to spinal cord were 1.12 ± 0.07 before operation and 2.11 ± 0.19 at 24 months after operation, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The range of motion of cervical vertebrae was (39.4 ± 3.2)º befeore operation and (42.1 ± 2.9)° at 24 months after operation in 13 cases without anterior cervical discectomy fusion, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); was (34.3 ± 3.4)° before operation and (29.2 ± 3.6)° at 24 months after operation in 12 cases with anterior cervical discectomy fusion, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The bone graft achieved bony union 3-5 months after operation (average 3.8 months). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were 7.9 ± 2.2 before operation and 15.6 ± 1.4 at 24 months after operation, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05), with an average improvement rate of 86.3%.  Conclusion Cervical flavectomy could rel ieve compression to spinal cord and nerves caused by the flaval l igament hypertrophy without damaging the normal integral ity of bony canal, thus avoiding the compl ication of axial symptoms and so on which are encountered in open-door expansile cervical laminoplasty.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MR IMAGING IN CERVICAL SPINAL CANAL STENOSIS COMBINED WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY

    Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of MR imaging in cervical spinal canal stenosis combined with spinal cord injury. Methods From August 1998 to May 2008, 41 patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis and spinal cord injury were treated, including 34 males and 7 females aged 32-71 years (average 53.4 years, 27 patients being older than 60 years). Patients’ MRI data were retrospectively analyzed. Injury was caused by fall ing from height in 8 cases, traffic accidentin 19 cases, crush due to heavy objects in 3 cases and other reasons in 11 cases. The time from injury to operation ranged from 2 hours to 3 years. There were 12 cases of anterior spinal cord injury syndrome, 23 of central spinal cord syndrome and 6 of Brown-Sequard syndrome. JOA score of spinal cord function was 3-11 points (average 6.6 points). Results MR imaging diagnosis before operation showed abnormal signal changes within the spinal cord in 37 cases (41 sites), anterior and posterior longitudinal l igaments and discs (APLLD) injury in 28 cases (30 sites) and signal of edema and hematoma signals in anterior surface of cervical spines (EBC) in 34 cases (36 sites). Diagnosis during operation revealed edemas braises, contusions tears of posterior soft tissue in 18 cases (20 sites), appendix fracture in 6 cases (7 sites), formation of EBC in 20 cases (23 sites), APLLD injury in 34 cases (44 sites), intervertebral instabil ity without the rupture of l igament and intervertebral disc in 7 cases (10 sites). Significant difference was evident between the MRI diagnosis before operation and the intraoperative discoveries (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The MR imaging diagnosis before operation do not correspond to the intraoperative discoveries, indicating that MRI diagnosis fails to make a relatively comprehensive and accurate diagnosis. So it is advisable to make a diagnosis based on cl inical symptoms.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content