Objective To investigate the cl inical effect of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) on twosegment cervical spondylosis and to research its influences on the range of motion (ROM) of the diseased segments and theadjacent superior and inferior segments. Methods From September 2004 to February 2007, 7 cases with cervical spondylosis at C4,5 and C5,6 were treated with CADR using Bryan artificial disc prosthesis, including 4 males and 3 females aged 30-45 years old (average 38.5 years old). All the patients had cervicodynia in various degrees, pain and numbness of l imbs and decreased muscle strength, including 3 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, 3 of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 1 of mixed cervical spondylosis. The course of disease was 12-54 months (average 27 months). Preoperatively, X-ray films revealed the intervertebral space of C4, 5 and C5,6 was narrowed and the cervical curve became straight, CT or MRI showed the intervertebral disk hernia of C4, 5 and C5,6, and the hyperostosis of vertebral margin compressed nerve root or spinal cord. All the patients had no response to the preopratively conservative treatment. JOA score and ROM of the diseased segments and the adjacent superior and inferior segments were compared before and after operation. Results All the patients survived the perioperative period, without hoarse voice, muscle spasm, dysphagia and cervicodynia. X-ray films showed the implanted prosthesis was well located, the height of intervertebral space was normal, and no prosthesis loosening, prosthesis migration and infection occurred 12 months after operation. All the 7 cases were followed up for 12-41 months (average 26.7 months). Cervicodynia and l imbs’pain and numbness disappeared, and muscle strength was improved obviously. The JOA score before and during the followup period was (8.35 ± 1.27) and (14.65 ± 1.61) points, respectively, indicating there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). For the ROM of C4,5 and C5,6, it was (8.38 ± 0.48)° and (9.16 ± 0.54)° before operation, respectively, and it increased to (11.15 ± 0.65)° and (12.75 ± 0.73)° after operation, respectively, showing there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The ROM at C3,4 and C6,7 before operation was (9.71 ± 0.76)° and (12.39 ± 0.58)°, espectively, while it was improved to (10.26 ± 0.47)° and (13.67 ± 0.71)° after operation, respectively, indicating there were no significant differences between before and after operation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The appl ication of Bryan Disc CADR for two-segment cervical spondylosis has satisfying therapeutic effects, can improve the ROM of diseased segments obviously, and has minor influences on the ROM of adjacent superior and inferior segment.
Objective To investigate the effect difference between the Solis fixation fusion and the titanium plate fixation by the cervical anterior approach after decompression and bone graft implantation. Methods Of the 104 patients with cervical disease from September 2001 to March 2004, 36 were treated with the Solis implantation after decompression by the cervical anterior approach, and 68 were treated with the titanium plate fixation after decompression and bone graft implantation. The recovery of the neurological function in all the patients were assessed with the JOA Scoring at 6 weeks,3,6,12,24 and 36 months. The fragment fusion and its stability as well as the changes in the intervertebral height were assessed with X-ray examination. Results According to the JOA Scoring, the excellent and good outcomes accounted for 94.4% in the Solis group and 94.1% in the titanium plate group. In allthe patients, the fragment fusion was achieved in 3 months. The change in the Cobb angle of the fused fragment was less than 5° at the flexionextension posture, 3.6±0.8° in the Solis group, 2.4±0.7° in the titanium plate group. There was significant differences between the two groups(P＜0.05). The intervertebral height of the operation fragment in the Solis group increased 1.6±0.7mm, which was higher than that in the titanium plate group(P＜0.05). Conclusion Clinical effects of the two internalfixation operations are good; however, the Solis fixation has more advantages because of its simpler performance,less trauma, and fewer complications.
Objective To evaluate the early outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a Zero-profile implant system (Zero-P) for interbody fusion in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Methods Between March 2010 and June 2011, 25 patients with cervical spondylosis underwent ACDF with Zero-P. There were 13 males and 12 females with an average age of 44.2 years (range, 26-67 years), including 14 cases of nerve root cervical spondylosis, 6 cases of spinal cervical spondylosis, and 5 cases of mixed cervical spondylosis. The disease duration was 3-120 months (median, 25 months). Single segment was involved in 20 cases, 2 segments in 4 cases, and 3 segments in 1 case. A total of 31 Zero-P were implanted (3 at C3, 4, 8 at C4, 5, 12 at C5, 6, and 8 at C6, 7). Primary cervical operation was performed in 23 cases and re-operation in 2 cases. Before and after operation, the height of intervertebral space and the cervical Cobb angle were measured; clinical outcome was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain in the neck and upper limb, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for myelopathy; and intervertebral fusion and the incidence of dysphagia were also observed. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All the patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 13.9 months). Interbody bone fusion was obtained, and the fusion time was 2.7-6.0 months (mean, 3.8 months). Three patients had dysphagia after operation; symptom disappeared at 1 week and 3 months after operation in 2 cases and 1 case, respectively. No fixation loosening, subsidence, or breakage occurred. The height of intervertebral space was significantly improved (P lt; 0.05) from (4.5 ± 0.5) mm at preoperation to (6.0 ± 0.7) mm at 1 week and (5.7 ± 0.6) mm at 12 months after operation; the cervical Cobb angle was significantly improved (P lt; 0.05) from (11.9 ± 6.1)° at preoperation to (21.2 ± 4.1)° at 1 week and (20.2 ± 3.7)° at 12 months after operation; and there was no significant difference between at 1 week and 12 months after operation (P gt; 0.05). The VAS score was significantly reduced (P lt; 0.05) from 7.1 ± 0.8 at preoperation to 1.9 ± 0.8 at 3 months and 1.0 ± 0.5 at 12 months after operation; the JOA score was significantly increased (P lt; 0.05) from 9.6 ± 1.3 at preoperation to 13.5 ± 1.0 at 3 months and 14.9 ± 1.0 at 12 months after operation; and there was significant difference between at 3 months and at 12 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The early outcome of ACDF using a Zero-P in the treatment of cervical spondylosis is satisfactory and reliable, and it can restore and maintain the cervical alignment and disc height, and disc has low incidence of postoperative dysphagia.
Objective To evaluate the long-term effect of excessive length of bone graft via anterior cervical approach and over distraction of intervertebral space on cervical curvature and postoperative neck axial symptom (AS). Methods FromJune 2001 to June 2004, 30 patients with nerve root cervical spondylosis at the C5,6 level underwent anterior cervicaldecompression, autogenous il iac bone graft and internal fixation with titanium plate. There were 14 males and 16 females aged 32-73 years old (average 54.7 years old), and the course of disease was 1-31 months (average 7 months). No instabil ity of cervical vertebrae was noted on the cervical dynamic position x-ray films. Intervertebral height was measured immediately after operation, and accordingly the patients were divided into two groups: the over distraction group (n=11), in which the length of bone graft was excessive, the intervertebral space was over distracted, and the intervertebral height was increased by more than 3 mm compared with the preoperative value; the proper distraction group (n=19), in which the length of bone graft was proper, no over distraction of the intervertebral space occured, and the intervertebral height was increased by less than 3 mm compared with the preoperative value. Regular X-ray exams were performed 1 week and 3, 24, and 48 months after operation to analyze bone fusion condition of the grafted bone, changes of the intervertebral height of the fused segments, and variation of physiological curvature of the cervical vertebra. The postoperative neck AS was evaluated according to the the neck AS evaluation criteria set by ZENG Yan and co-workers. Results All patients were followed up for 48-66 months (average 54.5 months). Cl inical symptoms were el iminated in all cases. No compl ications occurred in the proper distraction group; 1 patient of the over distraction group had ostoperative nerve root paralysis at C5 level, and recovered 3 months after proactive treatment. Bone fusion was achieved in all patients 3-6 months after operation, except for 1 case in the proper distraction group suffering from non-fusion 12 months after operation. There was no occurrence of loosening or breakage of steel plate and screw, and no displacement of the grafted bone. At 48 months after operation, the intervertebral height of the proper distraction group and the over distraction group was increased by (1.9 ± 1.8) mm and (3.5 ± 2.7) mm, respectively, when compared with the preoperativevalue (P gt; 0.05). The physiological curvature of the operated cervical segment was well maintained. The curvature of the proper distraction group and the over distraction group at the final follow-up visit was increased by (2.17 ± 1.83)° and (3.32 ± 2.71)°, respectively, when compared with the preoperative value (P gt; 0.05). The physiological curvature of the whole cervical vertebra at the final follow-up visit was increased by (4.57 ± 3.71)° in the proper distraction group and decreased by (2.43 ± 2.13)° in the over distraction group, when compared with the preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative neck S at 48 months after operation was 15.79% in the proper distraction group (11 cases excellent, 5 cases good, 3 cases fair) and 54.55% in the over distraction group (3 cases excellent, 2 cases good, 5 cases fair, 1 case poor), showing a significant difference between two groups (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Excessive length of bone graft via anterior cervical approach and over distraction of intervertebral space are bad for maintaining the physiological curvature of the whole cervical vertebra, and increase the incidence of postoperative neck AS. Selection of bone graft at the proper height is essential in anterior cervical operation.
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the early effectiveness of the Discover cervical artificial disc replacement in treating cervical spondylosis. Methods Qualified for the selective standard, 24 patients with cervical spondylosis were treated between March 2010 and March 2011. Of 24 patients, 13 patients underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) (ACDF group, between March 2010 and September 2010) and 11 patients underwent Discover cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR group, between September 2010 and March 2011). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, lesions typing, and affected segments between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operative time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and Odom’s scores were used to evaluate the postoperative effectiveness. In CADR group, the cervical range of motion (ROM) in all directions, and prosthesis eccentricity were measured before and after operation. Results Symptoms disappeared and no complication occurred after operation in the patients of 2 groups. The patients were followed up 12 to 18 months (mean, 15.3 months) in ACDF group and 6 to 12 months (mean, 9.6 months) in CADR group. The NDI scores in CADR group were significantly higher than those in ACDF group at 1, 3, and 6 months (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was observed in JOA score improvement rate between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). According to Odom’s score at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 3 cases with an excellent and good rate of 76.92% in ACDF group, and were excellent in 9 cases, good in 1 case, and poor in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 90.91% in CADR group, showing no significant difference (χ2=3.000, P=0.223). The patients in CADR group had significant limit of cervical joint ROM in flexion and extension and right bending at 1 month (P lt; 0.05), but cervical joint ROM restored after 3 months. The ROMs of left bending at 3 months and 6 months were bigger than preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). Meanwhile, ROM in left bending were bigger than that in right bending in replaced segment and upper segment (P lt; 0.05), and the ROM difference between left bending and right bending in upper segment was 2 times higher than that in the replaced segment; a marked linear correlation (P lt; 0.05) existed between the ROM difference and prosthesis eccentricity, and prosthesis bias had bigger ROM in lateral bending. Conclusion Discover cervical artificial disc replacement for treatment of cervical spondylosis can provide a good effectiveness and cervical postoperative movement function. As a new prosthesis, it has some merits such as simple operative steps and less complications.
Objective To explore the neck axial symptom (AS) after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and to make contrastive analysis. Methods From October 2004 to April 2006, 22 patients, 13 males and 9 females, aged 33-54 years old (43.3 on average), underwent Bryan cervical disc placement (groupA). Among them, there were 16 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 6 of nerve root cervical syndrome, with 20of single segment replacement and 2 of two segments replacement. The courses of disease were 1-21 months (6 months on average). Meanwhile, 30 patients, 17 males and 13 females, aged 35-64 years old (50.3 on average) underwent traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (group B). Among them, there were 19 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 11 of nerve root cervical syndrome, with 26 of single segments replacement and 4 of two segments replacement. The course of disease was 1-23 months (7 months on average). In both groups, the neurologic recovery rate, the change of cervical curvature of the operated segments and total range of motion (ROM), and incidence of neck axial symptoms were recorded and compared. Results All the patients were followed up for 24-42 months (30.6 months on average). There was no graveness compl ication happening during and after operation in both groups. There were no compl ications of prosthesis bit shifting and amotio in group A, and group B exhibited a bony fusion on X-ray films 6 months after operation, without plate and bolt loose or broken. The patients’ cl inical symptoms of radiculopathy were obviously rel ieved and the curative effect was satisfactory in two groups of nerve root cervical syndrome. In both groups of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the patients’ JOA scores at the postoperative follow-up increased obviously than preoperative (Plt; 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two groups before the operation and at the end of the follow-up (P gt; 0.05). The rate of sagittal al ignment of the operated segment with kyphosis increased obviously in group B, higher than in group A (P lt; 0.05).The total ROM of group B was obviously lower than preoperative (Plt; 0.01), and the pre- and postoperative difference of group A was not statistically significant (P gt; 0.05). The rate of postoperative neck AS was 18.18% in group A and 46.67% in group B, and the difference was statistically significant(Plt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, the use of Byran disc arthroplasty for cervical syndrome is associated with good outcomes. At the same time, it can maintain the cervical motion and curvature of operated segments, avoid the decrease of total ROM and lower the incidence of the postoperative neck AS.
In the context of accelerated rehabilitation, nutritional support for patients with orthopedic cervical spondylosis is an important condition for lessening postoperative stress response, reducing postoperative complications, shortening patient’s length of hospital stay, lowering medical expenses, and promoting early recovery of patients. Based on this, West China Hospital of Sichuan University explored and established the West China Hospital program for nutritional management in cervical spondylosis from the aspects of team building, nutritional assessment and monitoring, and nutritional intervention.
The incidence of perioperative sleep disorders in patients with cervical spondylosis is high, which affects the physiological and psychological rehabilitation effect of patients after surgery. The expert consensus (preliminary draft) was prepared by summarizing expert experience and recommendations. After expert review and revision, the consensus was formed. The consensus was developed based on existing evidence-based medical evidence and expert clinical experience, which is scientific and practical and can provide a basis for clinical medical personnel to prevent and treat perioperative sleep disorders in patients with cervical spondylosis.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using zero-profile anchored cage (ZAC) in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis, by comparing with plate-cage construct (PCC). Methods A clinical data of 65 patients with cervical spondylosis admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. During consecutive three-level ACDF, 35 patients were fixed with ZAC (ZAC group) and 30 patients with PCC (PCC group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, surgical segment, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PSTT), cervical lordosis, and surgical segmental angle. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, clinical indicators (JOA score, NDI, VAS score), and radiological indicators (cervical lordosis, surgical segmental angle, implant subsidence, surgical segment fusion, and adjacent segment degeneration), and the postoperative complications [swelling of the neck (PSTT), dysphagia] were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Patients in both groups were followed up 24-39 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up duration between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were lower in ZAC group than in PCC group, and the length of hospital stay was longer, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). At each time point after operation, both groups showed significant improvements in JOA score, VAS score, and NDI compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). Both groups showed an increase in PSTT at 3 days and 3, 6 months after operation compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but returned to preoperative levels at last follow-up (P>0.05). The PSTT at 3 days and 3 months after operation were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The incidences of dysphagia at 3 days and 3 months were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed at 6 months and last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no postoperative complication in both groups including hoarseness, esophageal injury, cough, or hematoma. Both groups showed improvement in cervical lordosis and surgical segmental angle compared to preoperative levels, with a trend of loss during follow-up. The cervical lordosis loss and surgical segmental angle loss were significantly more in the ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). The incidence of implante subsidence was significantly higher in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the ZAC group and PCC group in the incidences of surgical segment fusion and adjacent segment degeneration (P>0.05). ConclusionIn consecutive three-level ACDF, both ZAC and PCC can achieve satisfactory effectiveness. The former can reduce the incidence of postoperative dysphagia, while the latter can better maintain cervical curvature and reduce the incidence of implant subsidence.
Objective To compare the short-term effectiveness and the impact on cervical segmental range of motion using Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion for the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis. MethodsThe clinical data of 56 patients with single-segment cervical spondylosis who met the selection criteria between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into study group (27 cases, using Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement) and control group (29 cases, using Zero-P fusion) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, type of cervical spondylosis, disease duration, involved segments and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), surgical segments range of motion, upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion, overall cervical spine range of motion, and cervical curvature (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization stay, time of returning to work, clinical effectiveness indicators (VAS score, JOA score, NDI, and improvement rate of each score), and imaging indicators (surgical segments range of motion, upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion, overall cervical spine range of motion, and cervical curvature, prosthesis position, bone absorption, heterotopic ossification, etc.) were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05); the postoperative hospitalization stay and time of returning to work in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). Both groups were followed up 12-64 months, with an average of 26 months. There was no complication such as limb or organ damage, implant failure, and severe degeneration of adjacent segments requiring reoperation. The VAS score, JOA score, and NDI of the two groups at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the above scores at each time point after operation between the two groups (P>0.05); there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of each score between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). The surgical segments range of motion in the study group maintained to varying degrees after operation, while it in the control group basically disappeared after operation, showing significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion in the study group when compared with preoperative ones (P>0.05), while the upper adjacent segments range of motion in the control group increased significantly (P<0.05). The overall cervical spine range of motion and cervical curvature of the two groups decreased at 3 months after operation, and increased to varying degrees at last follow-up, but there was no significant difference between groups and within groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, X-ray films and CT examinations showed that no prosthesis loosening, subsidence, or displacement was found in all patients; there were 2 cases (7.4%) of periprosthetic bone resorption and 3 cases (11.1%) of heterotopic ossification which did not affect the surgical segments range of motion. ConclusionBoth the Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion have satisfactory short-term effectiveness in treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis. Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement can also maintain the cervical spine range of motion to a certain extent, while reducing the occurrence of excessive motion of adjacent segments after fusion.