ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of different administration of conbercept on choroidal neovasculature (CNV) in patients with pathological myopia (PM).MethodsA retrospective case-control study. From June 2012 to June 2017, 57 patients (61 eyes) with PM-CNV diagnosed in the Ophthalmology Department of General Hospital of Central Theater Command were included in this study. All patients underwent BCVA, intraocular pressure, refractive index, slit lamp microscope, FFA, OCT examination and axial length (AL) measurement. An international standard vision chart was used in the BCVA test, which was converted to logMAR vision. According to the initial treatment plan, the patients were divided into 1+PRN treatment group (group A) and 3+PRN treatment group (group B), with 27 patients (31 eyes) and 30 patients (30 eyes), respectively. There was no significantly statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P＞0.05). The eyes was injected with 10 mg/ml of conbercept 0.05 ml (including conbercept 0.5 mg). After completion of initial treatment, on-demand treatment was performed according to repeated treatment standards. The average follow-up time was 30.8 months. The time point for curative effect determination was 24 months after treatment. The frequency and recurrence rate of vitreous cavity injections in the two groups of patients and the changes of BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), diopter and AL were compared and observed. Continuous variables were compared between groups by independent sample t test. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 test. logMAR BCVA and injection frequency were compared by Wilcoxon rank test. Comparison of CMT before and after treatment was performed by paired t test.ResultsAfter 24 months, the number of intravitreal injections in group A and group B were 3.94±1.88 and 4.83±1.72, respectively, with statistically significant difference (Z=－2.182, P=0.029). After completion of initial treatment, the number of retreatments in group A and group B were 2.94±1.88 and 1.83±1.72, respectively, with significantly statistical different (Z=－2.330, P=0.020). The CNV recurrence rates were 38.71% and 13.33%, respectively, with statistically significant difference (χ2=5.074, P=0.024). Compared with prior treatment, the average BCVA at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment significantly increased in group A and B (Group A: Z=5.634, 5.367, 5.532, 6.344, 6.135l; P＜0.05. Group B: Z=5.809, 5.090, 5.341, 5.939, 8.103; P＜0.05). At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the average BCVA of the two groups (Z=－0.966, －0.932, －0.523, －1.759; P=0.334, 0.351, 0.601,0.079); the difference was statistically significant at 24 months (Z=－2.525, P=0.012). Compared with CMT before treatment, the difference in the average CMT reduction of the eyes in groups A and B was statistically significant at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (Group A: t=4.691, 2.624, 2.121, 1.921, 2.237; P＜0.05. Group B: t=4.947, 4.554, 5.290, 5.567, 5.314; P＜0.05); the average CMT comparison between the two groups was not statistically significant (P=0.457, 0.871, 0.505, 0.333, 0.798). During the follow-up period, there were no ocular complications and systemic adverse reactions.ConclusionsDifferent administration methods for the treatment of PM-CNV by intravitreal injection of conbercept are safe and effective, which can effectively improve BCVA and reduce CMT. Total injection of 3+PRN is more than 1+PRN. However, the injections of retreatment and CNV recurrence rate is lower, and the final follow-up vision is better.
ObjectiveTo observe the safety and efficacy of Keluoxin capsules in the treatment of moderate to severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). MethodsAn open-label, multi-center, single-arm, phase Ⅱa clinical trial. From May 2014 to December 2016, the patients diagnosed with moderate to severe NPDR who received Keroxin treatment in General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Affiliated Eye Hospital to Nanchang University, Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, and Eye Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences were divided into moderate NPDR group and severe NPDR group. The baseline data of the patients were obtained, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography and fundus photography were performed. On the basis of maintaining the original diabetes treatment, all patients took Keluoxin capsules orally for 24 weeks; 24 weeks after treatment was used as the time point for evaluating the efficacy. BCVA letters, central macular thickness (CMT) and 6 mm diameter total macular volume (TMV), retinal vascular leakage area, and retinal non-perfusion (RNP) area within an average diameter of 6 mm were compared between the two groups at baseline and 24 weeks after treatment. Independent sample Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups. Categorical data were compared by χ2 test. ResultsA total of 60 NPDR patients and 60 eyes were included, 9 cases were lost to follow-up, and 51 cases and 51 eyes were finally included, including 37 eyes in the moderate NPDR group and 14 eyes in the severe NPDR group, respectively. At baseline, BCVA in moderate NPDR group and severe NPDR group were (80.1±6.8), (81.4±6.3) letters, respectively. CMT were (249.5±32.1), (258.9±22.2) μm, respectively. TMV were (8.79±1.09), (8.95±1.31) mm3, respectively. Retinal vascular leakage areas were (7.69±10.63), (10.45±7.65) mm2, respectively. RNP area were (2.48±5.74), (10.63±20.06) mm2, respectively. There were 11 (29.7%, 11/37) and 4 (28.6%, 4/14) eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME), respectively; 24 weeks after treatment, BCVA in moderate NPDR group and severe NPDR group increased by (1.3±5.2), (3.2±3.0) letters, respectively. Compared with baseline, there was a statistically significant difference in the severe NPDR group (t=－3.986, P=0.033). CMT were (252.1±45.6), (269.8±57.2) μm, respectively. There were no significant differences compared with baseline (t=－0.567, －0.925; P＞0.05). TMV were (9.96±1.16), (10.09±1.32) mm3, respectively. There were no significant differences compared with baseline (t=－0.996, －1.304; P＞0.05). Retinal vascular leakage area decreased (0.19±6.90), (1.98±7.52) mm2, respectively. There were no significant differences compared with baseline (t=0.168, 0.983; P＞0.05). RNP area were (3.01±6.47), (10.36±19.57) mm2, respectively. Compared with baseline, the differences were statistically significant (t=－1.267, 0.553; P＞0.05). There were 8 (21.6%, 8/37) and 3 (21.4%, 3/14) eyes with DME, respectively. Compared with baseline, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=11.919, 4.571; P=0.001, 0.033). ConclusionKeluoxin capsules can stabilize or improve BCVA, CMT, TMV and RNP area in patients with moderate and severe NPDR, and reduce the area of retinal vascular leakage.