Objective To investigate the clinical applications of plasma shock wave lithotripsy （PSWL） in the treatment of calculi via choledochoscope. Methods Between 2004 and 2009, 56 huge residual calculi (54 cases) were underwent PSWL via choledochoscope treatment in our hospital. Calculi size: diameter ≤10 mm in 9 calculi, 10 mm lt;diameter ≤15 mm in 24 calculi, 15 mm lt;diameter ≤20 mm in 17 calculi, and diameter gt; 20 mm in 6 calculi. Twenty four cases of these 54 patients had bile duct stricture. Procedure: Firstly found the calculus, and then the lithotriptor wire was introduced to the place 0.5-1.0 mm far away from the calculus surface through choledochoscope channel, and powered on, fired, destructed. Results Forty-eight cases of 54 patients were cured by PSWL with 1 times, 2 cases with 2 times, 2 cases with 3 times, and 2 cases with 4 times. Shock 4-300 times were exported per PSWL, with an average of 65 times. Crushing each stone needed shock for 4-680 times, with an average of 77 times. The calculi were ruptured in different degrees by PSWL, of which 20 cases were completely ruptured. All calculi were completely extracted. Except one case with bile duct stricture was found a small amount of bile duct bleeding during operation, all other patients had no operation complications. Conclusion PSWL technique plays an important role in lithotripsy. It is easy to deal with intrahepatic impacted calculi by PSWL, especially the pigment stones with rough surface.
Objective To study the effect of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy and T tube drainage. Metheods Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with choledochoscopy via choledochotomy was performed in 105 patients, T tube was placed in all patients with laparoscopic suturing technique.Results Except negative exploration in 2 cases, duct clearance was achieved in 99 per cent (102/103) of patients. Conclusion Laparoscopic exploratoin of common bile duct via choledochotomy and T tube drainage is one of the safe and effective management options for common bile duct calculi.
Objective To explore the effect of gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope.Methods The data of 60 cases of gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope （observation group） and carried out with the same period 61 cases of small incision gallbladder preserving surgery （control group） between June 2008 to January 2013 were retrospective analyzed. Results All patients were followed up for （18±2.4）months （6-36 months）. The intraoperative blood loss， postoperative gallbladder hemorrhage rate， gallbladder dysfunctionrate， postoperative hospitalization time， stone recurrence rate， and reoperation rate in observation group were less orlower or shorter than the control group （P＜0.05）. The operative time and hospital costs in observation group were longeror higher than that of the control group （P＜0.05）. The rest of the observation index of two groups were no significant differences （P＞0.05）. Conclusions The gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope is safeand feasible in technique level， and the short-term effect after operation is better. But the operation indications must be controlled strictly. The long-term efficacy needs further accumulation of cases and collect enough evidence to verify.
Objective To study the clinical effects of laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods Clinical data of 74 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis between Mar. 2009 and Feb. 2011 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them， 37 cases underwent the laparoscope combined with choledochoscope operation （referred to as the double mirror operation group） and 37 cases underwent the conventional open operation （open operation group）. The intraoperative conditions， therapeutic effect， and complications of patients in 2 groups were compared. Results The stone clearance rates of the two groups were 100%. The recurrence rate of 2 groups in the follow-up process was no significantly difference （P＞0.05）. In the double mirror operation group， the operative time was significantly longer than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；the intraoperative bleeding was significantly less than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；the anal exhaust time after operation， get out of bed time after operation， and total duration of hospitalization were significantly shorter than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that open oper-ation group（P＜0.01）. Conclusion Laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis patients has exact effects， with minor trauma， quicker recovery， and fewer complications， and it’s worthy of promotion.
Objective To expand the utilization of minimally invasive technologies for parapancreatic abscess, and summarize the application experience of choledochoscope for treatment of parapancreatic abscess. Methods The clinical data and treatment effectiveness of 36 patients with parapancreatic abscess from Dec. 2000 to Dec. 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients had experienced percutaneous puncture and been placed drainage tube under the ultrasound guidance first, then expanded the sinus tract gradually, and performed debridement by choledochoscope. The flexibility of choledochoscope was used to remove the necrotic tissue and pyogenic membrane repeatedly by clamping, netting and vacuum aspiration in every domain. Results Thirty-six patients were performed percutaneous puncture and placed drainage tube, 3 cases were given canalis singularis, 7 cases were double tube, 26 cases were over three tube. The debridement times were 3-14 by choledochoscope, average 5.6 times. There were 6 cases with improving systemic symptoms, blood routine and temperature recovering normal, and drink and food recovering, then discharged from hospital with tube after 1-2 times of debridement. Length of stay was 25-132 d, average 76 d. The curing rate was 91.7% (33/36). Two cases were turned into open surgery because of broad necrotic tissue range combined with many abdominal cavity abscess with good postoperative recovery and cured. One case was dead of severe multiple organ failure combination. There were 2 patients with hemorrhage, 3 patients with external intestinal fistula. Conclusions The debridement of choledochoscope for parapancreatic abscess treatment is a simple, flexible and effective method. It changes the viewpoint that parapancreatic abscess can be cured only by operation drainage, decreases the patients’ trauma and accomplishes the idea of damage control by minimally invasive technologies.
Objective To investigate the method of the treatment on cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of common bile duct (CBD) by laparoscopy with combination of choledochoscope and duodenoscope and its significances. Methods Forty-two patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD were treated by laparoscopy with combination of choledochoscope and duodenoscope from Jan. 2007 to Dec. 2008 in this hospital. Under general anesthesia, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed first, then the anterior wall of CBD was opened, calculus of CBD was treated by choledochoscope and duodenoscope intraoperatively. Then primary suture of the CBD was performed under laparoscope and nasobiliary drainage duct was placed. Results One case was converted to laparotomy, 41 cases succeeded and left hospital after being taken off the nasobiliary drainage duct in 5-7 d. No case died, no bile leakage, no bleeding or perforation of upper digestive tract, and no acute pancreatitis happened after operation. Conclusion Laparoscopy with combination of choledochoscope and duodenoscope treating cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD is a safe, effective and quickly recovering method with less sufferings and trauma.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of the surgery with laparoscope combined with choledochoscope on plateau hepatic hydatid biliary fistulas. MethodsA total of 100 patients with liver hydatid disease diagnosed between January 2012 and June 2013 were divided into two groups according to the admitting time:laparoscope combined with choledochoscope group (combined group) and laparoscope group, with 50 patients in each group. The therapeutic results of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 186 biliary fistulas were found in the combined group during the operation, and there were 5 patients with biliary fistulas after the surgery; while 87 biliary fistulas were found in laparoscope group during the operation and there were 16 patients with biliary fistulas after the surgery. The difference in the occurrence rate of biliary fistulas after surgery between the two groups was significant (χ2=7.294, P=0.007). No infection of incisional wound was found in combined group but 5 infection was found in laparoscope group. The postoperative extubation time in the combined group and laparoscope group was (10.35±3.87) and (27.16±4.58) days, respectively, with a significant difference (t=12.538, P<0.001). ConclusionThe laparoscope combined with choledochoscope is a minimally invasive and safe therapeutic option for plateau hepatic hydatid biliary fistulas.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience on combination of laparoscopy, choledochoscopy, and duodenoscopy in treatment of cholecystolithiasis with small diameter of choledocholith during the same period via multiple approach. MethodsThe clinical data of 71 cases of cholecystolithiasis with small diameter(The internal diameter of common bile duct was 4-8 mm)of choledocholith underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)plus laparoscopic and endoscopic cholelithotomy plus laparoscopic and endoscopic sphincterotomy(LC+LEC+LEST)from February 2001 to December 2013 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Firstly, the LC and common bile duct exploration was performed, then the ureteral catheter or zebra guide wire was inserted into the common bile duct and duodenum cavity through cystic duct or common bile duct incision. Under the guidance of ureteral catheter or zebra guide wire, the choledochoscope was inserted into the common bile duct and cholelithotomy was performed by stone net or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Then, the duodenoscope was inserted into the papillary of duodenum, the papillary of duodenum was cut by the pin-headlike electro-knife along the ureteric catheter or zebra guide wire, choledocholith was removed with the reticulation of choledochoscopy and duodenoscopy. ResultsLC+LEC+LEST was successfully performed on 71 cases of cholecystolithiasis with small diameter of choledocholith. The placement of a catheter via cystic incision was in 59 cases, via common bile duct incision was in 22 cases. The common bile duct stones of 64 patients were completely removed under the choledochoscope, of 12 patients were completely removed under the combination of choledochoscope and duodenoscope. No case was converted to laparotomy. The bile leakage occurred in 5 cases and cured by patent drainage. The slight pancreatitis occurred in one case after operation. There was no patient with residual stones, perforations of intestine and bile duct, hemorrhoea, severe pancreatitis, or death. ConclusionIf patients are indicated, LC+LEC+LEST is safe and effective to remove the cholecystolithiasis with small diameter of choledocholith.
ObjectiveTo discuss the relation between bile duct anastomotic stricture and bile duct injury by endo-scopic observation following liver transplantation and it, s efficacy of endoscopic treatment. Method The clinical data of 24 cases of bile duct anastomotic stricture following liver transplantation diagnosed by cholangiography were analyzed retro-spectively. Results①Twenty-four cases of bile duct anastomotic strictures were included in 3 cases of typeⅠa, 2 cases of typeⅠb, 4 cases of typeⅡ, 1 case of typeⅢa, 5 cases of typeⅢb, and 9 cases of typeⅢc.②The redness of intrahepatic bile duct mucosa, banding erosion, ulcer and fusion of anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅠa andⅢa. The redness of intrahepatic bile duct and anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅡwithout ulcer and fusion. The extensive erosion and ulcer of intrahepatic bile duct and redness of anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅢb. The extensive erosion, ulcer and partial necrosis of intrahepatic bile duct and anastomotic stricture mucosa could be seen in typeⅠb andⅢc.③Seventeen cases were cured by choledochoscopy through T tube, the biliary casts were moved out and the anastomotic strictures were relieved by balloon dilatation and placement of plastic stenting for 2 to 6 months, no recurrence happened. One case of typeⅠb treated by percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage(PTCD) and percuta-neous transhepatic cholangioscopy(PTCS) was developed into the stricture of typeⅡduring following-up for 19 months. Two cases of typeⅠa were treated by ERCP, the biliary casts were moved, one of which was cured, another 1 case was developed into the stricture of typeⅡduring following-up for 5 months. Two cases of typeⅡwere treated by ERCP, the biliary casts were moved, balloon dilatation and placement of plastic stent were performed, one of which was cured, another 1 case was recurrent during following-up for 1 months. The strictures were not relieved by multiple plastic stents for 4 to 6 months in 3 patients with recurrence and progress, but which was relieved by full-covered self-expanding removable metal stents for 4 to 7 months, there was no recurrence during following-up. One case of typeⅢb and one case of typeⅢc received the secondary open operation or choledochoscopy and placement of plastic stent for biliary infection and jaundice after the treatment of ERCP were cured. ConclusionsBiliary stricture following liver transplantation accompanies different degree biliary injury. The slightest is typeⅡand typeⅠa, typeⅢa is the second, typeⅢb is more serious, and typeⅠb and typeⅢc are the worst. Choledochoscopy is a better choose for anastomotic strictures. ERCP is not a better choose for anastomotic strictures of typeⅠb, Ⅲb, andⅢc.
ObjectiveTo summarize clinical experiences of combination of laparoscope,choledochoscope,and balloon nasobiliary exploration (LCBNE) in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis with small diameter (0.3-0.8 cm) of common bile duct (CBD). MethodsFrom April 2010 to May 2015,there were 43 cases of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis with small diameter of CBD underwent LCBNE,involving choledochotomy,choledochoscopic exploration,electrohydralic lithothipsy,balloon nasobiliary dilatation for removing cholelith,nasobiliary drainage,and the primary closure of incision. ResultsThe procedure was successful in 27 cases of removing the bile duct residual stones through the choledochoscopic procedure,9 cases through the balloon nasobiliary procedure,and 7 cases were converted to endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithasis.No case was converted to open CBD exploration.No case had residual stone.Bile leakage occurred in 1 case,which was cured by peritoneal drainage and nasobiliary drainage.One patient had a slight pancreatitis after operation.One patient had the stenosis of primary suture of CBD incision.Total postoperative complications rate was 7.0%(3/43).No case had perforations of intestine and bile duct,bleeding,severe pancreatitis,and death after operation. ConclusionFrom preliminary results of limited cases in this study,if patients are indicated,combination of LCBNE in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis with small diameter of CBD is safe and effective.