Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of dasatinib in doses of 140 mg once daily and 70 mg twice daily for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from Embase (1974 to November 2011), Pubmed (1966 to November 2011), The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2011), CBM (1979 to November 2011), VIP (1989 to November 2011), CNKI (1994 to November 2011), Wanfang Data (1997 to November 2011) and references listed in all articles. RCTs meeting inclusive criteria were included, the data were extracted, the quality was evaluated and cross-checked by two reviewers independently according to Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and then meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of four studies involving two RCTs and 862 patients were included. Results of meta-analyses showed that when dasatinib was used in the long-term treatment of CML, no significant difference was found between 140 mg once daily and 70 mg twice daily in the complete hematologic response (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.07, P=0.58), complete cytogenetic response (RR=0.94, 95%CI 0.80 to 1.11, P=0.47) and major cytogenetic response (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.13, P=0.86). In the short-term treatment of CML, there were no significant differences in the complete hematologic response (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.07, P=0.73), complete cytogenetic response (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.26, P=0.95) and major cytogenetic response (RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.22, P=0.95). The subgroup analyses on the long-term treatment of CML in both chronic phase and advanced phase showed that there were no significant differences in the complete hematologic response, major cytogenetic response and complete cytogenetic response. Conclusion In the effectiveness of dasatinib for CML, the dose of 140 mg once daily is similar to the dose of 70 mg twice daily. Considering possible moderate selection bias existing in the methodological quality of the included studies which may affect the authenticity of outcomes, this conclusion should be further proved by conducting more high-quality, large-scale and double- blinded RCTs.
Objective We intended to get good understanding of the current role of imatinib （or glivec） in the treatment of a patient with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Methods We attempted to find the current best evidence of imatinib for treating chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase by searching ACP Journal Club （1991 -Jun, 2005 ）, The Cochrane Library（Issue 2, 2005 ）and MEDLINE（1990 -Jun, 2005 ） and further critically appraised the available evidence. Results Imatinib appeared to be more effective than current standard drag treatments in terms of hematologic and cytogenetic response with better quality of life and fewer side effects. However, there was uncertainty concerning long term outcomes. Given the current evidence together with our clinical experience and considering the patient and his family members＇ values and preference, imatinib （400 mg qd） was administered to him. No obvious adverse effects occurred with 3 months follow-up. Conclusions Imatinib is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Further researches on long-term follow-up data from imatinib trials are definitely needed.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the risk of arterial ischemic and metabolic adverse events in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect clinical trials, observational studies and case reports of adverse events in CML patients treated with TKIs from inception to February 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 22 studies involving 4 223 patients were included. The incidence rates of ischemic heart disease in any grade were 2 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 2 to 3) for nilotinib, and 0 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 0 to 3) for imatinib. The incidence of ischemic heart disease in grade 3 or 4 was 1 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 0 to 2) for nilotinib. The incidence of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in any grade was 2 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 0 to 14) for nilotinib, and 0 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 0 to 2) for imatinib. The incidence of hypertension in any grade was 1 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 0 to 3) for nilotinib, and 44 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 27 to 71) for ponatinib. The incidence of hypertension in grade 3 or 4 was 2 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 0 to 15) for nilotinib, and 22 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 8 to 58) for ponatinib. The incidence of hyperlipidemia in any grade was 17 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 5 to 59) for nilotinib. The incidence of hyperglycemia in any grade was 11 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 9 to 15) for nilotinib, 2 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 1 to 4) for imatinib, 1 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 0 to 5) for dasatinib, and 19 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 19 to 20) for bosutinib. The incidence of hyperglycemia in grade 3 or 4 was 4 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 3 to 5) for nilotinib, and 1 per 100 patient-years (95%CI 1 to 2) for bosutinib.ConclusionsPatients treated with nilotinib have a greater possibility of ischemic heart and peripheral arterial occlusive disease compared with patients treated with imatinib. Patients treated with ponatinib have a high incidence rate of hypertension, and patients treated with nilotinib have a high incidence rate of hyperlipidemia. Patients treated with bosutinib and nilotinib have higher risk of hyperglycemia compared with patients treated with imatinib or dasatinib.