Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of cordyceps sinensis for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD). Methods We electronically searched databases including CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 7, 2013) and EMbase for randomized controlled trial (RCT) and quasi-RCTs on the effectiveness and safety of cordyceps sinensis for COPD. According to Cochrane methods, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Fourteen quasi-RCTs involving 1 162 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) compared with routine treatment alone, cultured cordyceps sinensis in combination of routine treatment improved total effective rates (stationary stage: RR=1.33, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.54, P=0.000 3; advanced period: RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.62, P=0.000 8). Also cultured cordyceps sinensis in combination of routine treatment improved lung function (FEV1/FVC: MD=5.48, 95%CI 3.22 to 7.74, Plt;0.000 01; FEV1%: MD=3.75, 95%CI 0.91 to 6.59, P=0.010), and prolonged exercise duration (MD=43.51, 95%CI 27.66 to 59.36, Plt;0.000 01) for COPD patients in stationary stage. However, no evidence was found in blood gas analysis, immune function, and quality of life; and b) the results of one study showed that, cultured cordyceps sinensis in combination of routine treatment was comparable with immune regulator (BCG-PSY) in combination of routine treatment with regards to total effective rates, but it could better improve lung function of patients. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that cultured cordyceps sinensis is effective in treating COPD, especially in treating lung function and exercise duration of COPD patients in stationary stage and increasing total effective rates. However, the strength of evidence is affected by poor methodological quality of the included studies. High-quality trials with large sample size are needed to verify its clinical effects.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of perioperative nebulization of ipratropium bromide on preoperative pulmonary function and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as well as safety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who underwent lung resection in thoracic surgery. MethodsDuring November 18, 2013 to August 12, 2015, 192 COPD patients with a necessity of selective surgical procedures of lobectomy or right bilobectomy or segmentectomy under general anaesthesia in 10 centers were 1 : 1 randomized to an ipratropium bromide group (96 patients) and a placebo group (96 patients), to compare the effect on preoperative pulmonary function and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. The average age of treated patients was 62.90±6.50 years, with 168 male patients and 22 female patients. Results The demographic and baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The adjusted mean increase of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in the ipratropium bromide group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (169.90±29.07 mL vs. 15.00±29.35 mL, P<0.05). The perioperative use of ipratropium bromide significantly decreased incidence of postoperative pneumonia (2.6% vs. 14.1%, P<0.05). There was no ipratropium bromide related adverse event (AE) observed in this trial. ConclusionThis trial indicates that perioperative nebulization of ipratropium bromide significantly improves preoperative lung function and reduces postoperative pneumonia in COPD patients undergoing lung resection in thoracic surgery, and has good safety profile.