Objective To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus in hospitals of different levels and the knowledge of status epilepticus in clinical physicians, in order to better guide clinical education in the future. Methods From August 2014 to August 2015, a questionnaire was designed and used to investigate the general situation of the hospital, the diagnosis of status epilepticus and the clinical practice among trainee doctors and students in the epilepsy training class in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit and the Department of Neurology of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The results of the investigation were statistically analyzed. Results Ninety questionnaires were distributed, and all the questionnaires were retrieved with validity. The number of investigated physicians was 42 (46.7%) from the Department of Neurology, 6 (6.7%) from the Department of Neurosurgery, 30 (33.3%) from the Intensive Care Unit and 12 (13.3%) from other departments. Twenty-seven (30.0%) physicians were from class Ⅲ grade A hospitals, 31 (34.4%) from class Ⅲ grade B hospitals, and 32 (35.6%) from class Ⅱ grade A hospitals. All the class Ⅲ hospitals and 53.1% of class Ⅱ hospitals had electroencephalograph monitoring facilities. The proportion of status epilepticus patients ranged from 0.5% to 10.0% in different hospitals. There were great differences in the identification and treatment of convulsive status epilepticus among different hospitals. Conclusions Status epilepticus is a common emergency. Questionnaire survey is an effective means to reflect the difference in identifying and treating the emergency among different departments and hospitals. It can guide clinical education and promote the identification and treatment of the emergency more accurately in doctors of all levels.
ObjectiveUsing Quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) analysis, this paper systematically reviewed the factors influencing the poor outcome of children with convulsive status epilepticus (CSE).MethodsTo longitudinal cohort studies on the prognostic evaluation of CSE mortality and mobidity in children.The retrieval time was from January 2008 to November 2019, and three system reviewers PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE and other databases were used to search for literatures related carried out literature extraction and quality evaluation. According to the QUIPS analysis method, the included literatures were scored, the quality grade was divided, and the analysis variables of medium/high quality literatures with statistical significance were selected to draw a conclusion.ResultsQUIPS analysis was used to assess the literature quality, 17 medium/high quality literatures were included, and the factors with statistical significance (P<0.05) mentioned at least twice or more in≥2 medium/high quality literatures were selected, which were considered as important risk factors affecting prognosis.These factors include: etiology, age, duration of convulsion, refractory CSE, neuroimaging abnormalities.ConclusionFive risk factors indicating poor outcome of CSE in children were summarized. Due to the heterogeneity of various literature studies, Meta-analysis has not been completed, so it has certain limitations.
Objectives Retrospective analysis of the Tibetan convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) for the aetiology, prognosis and its influencing factors in Tibet area. Methods Through electronic patient record, making “epilepsy”, “status epilepticus ”, “epileptic seizure” as keywords, convulsive status epilepticus patients in the People’s Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region hospitalized from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively observed, gathering their clinical data and aided examinations furthermore, and the prognoses were returned by telephone, meanwhile the functional status of those patients was assessed by the modified rankin scale. and the causes differ in gender, age, out-of-hospital antiepileptic treatment, family history of epilepsy and history of epilepsy were analyzed. The prognostic factors were analyzed by logistic regression. Results A total of 2 254 hospitalized patients with epilepsy were retrieved, including 331 CSE patients aged 14~84 years, 219 males and 112 females. There were 36 lost calls, 62 CSE deaths (21.01%), and 4 adverse outcomes (non-death)(1.7%).There were statistically significant differences in etiology of CSE in different ages and history of epilepsy (P<0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences in gender, out-of-hospital antiepileptic treatment, progression of refractory status epilepticus and family history of epilepsy. Cerebrovascular disease was the main cause of CSE in people aged 45 and over (54 cases), while the main cause of CSE in people aged under 45 was unknown (104 cases).Among the patients with previous history of epilepsy, the highest proportion was unknown cause [117 cases (48.8%)]; Among patients without a history of epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease [34 cases (37.4)] was the most common cause of CSE. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of prognostic factors of CSE showed that gender, age, GCS and electrolyte disorder had statistically significant effects on the death of CSE patients (P<0.05), while altitude and their duration and other factors had no statistically significant effects on the death of CSE patients (P>0.05). ConclusionsCerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of CSE in people aged 45 and over. Male, advanced age, low GCS score at discharge, and electrolyte disorder were risk factors.