Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at the end of December 2019, more than 85% of the population in China has been infected. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mainly affects the respiratory system, especially the lungs. The mortality rate of patients with severe infection is high. A percentage of 6% to 10% of patients will eventually develop into COVID-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS), which requires mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Some patients who survive acute lung injury will subsequently develop post COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF). Both fully treated CARDS and severe PCPF are suitable candidates for lung transplantation. Due to the special course, evaluation strategies are different from those used in patients with common end-stage lung disease. After lung transplantation in COVID-19 patients, special treatment is required, including standardized nucleic acid testing for the novel coronavirus, adjustment strategy of immunosuppressive drugs, and rational use of antiviral drugs, which is a big challenge for the postoperative management of lung transplantation. This consensus was evidence-based written and was reached by experts after multiple rounds of discussions, providing reference for assessment and postoperative management of patients with interstitial pneumonia after COVID-19 infection.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical characteristics and epidemiological characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 treated early in Jiangxi province.MethodsFour-night patients with coronavirus disease 2019 treated in this hospital from January 21st to 27th, 2020 were included in this study. The epidemiological and clinical data of patients after admission were collected, and laboratory tests such as blood routine, urine routine, stool routine, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, myocardial enzymes, erythrocyte sedimentation (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), calcitonin, coagulation, T cell subset and Chest CT were reviewed. The clinical results of common and severe/critically ill patients were compared.ResultsOf the 49 patients, 40 were common and 9 were severe/critical. Fourty-six patients had a clear history of contact with Wuhan or other areas of Hubei. The sex ratio was 2.06∶1, and the average age was 42.9 years. The symptoms were mainly fever (78.7%), cough (38.8%), and fatigue (18.4%). 28.6% (14 cases) of patients had hypertension and diabetes. Serum lymphocyte count and calcium concentration of the patients were decreased, but lactate dehydrogenase, ESR, CRP and serum amyloid A were increased in these patients. T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+) decreased significantly in these patients. Forty-seven patients (95.9%) had single or scattered patchy ground glass density shadows on the chest CT. Compared with common patients, the patients with severe/critical patients were older (P=0.023), hospitalized later (P=0.002), and had higher comorbidities (P=0.017). ESR (P=0.001）, CRP (P=0.010) and the serum amyloid A (P=0.040) increased significantly, while CD3+ (P<0.001), CD4+ (P=0.012), CD8+ (P=0.006) decreased significantly in severe/critical patients.ConclusionsThe patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Jiangxi province are commonly imported from Wuhan. Severe/critical patients are older, hospitalized later, and have more medical complications and more severe systemic inflammatory reactions than common patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the epidemiological characteristics of the first cluster of patients with coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) in Gansu.MethodsAll 6 COVID-19 patients from a non-familial cluster in Gansu, were extracted from Gansu Provincial Health Information System until Feb 20, 2020. The patients were confirmed by nucleic acid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The analyses were included via retrospective method: patient clinical characteristics, the summary of epidemiology, and CT image characteristics.ResultsThis clustered outbreak was the first non-family clustered outbreak in Gansu after traveled to Thailand. All 6 COVID-19 confirmed patients were a kindergarten staff in Gansu, aged from 26 to 51 years, and were female. They traveled to Thailand in the same period, and had the same epidemiological exposure history. They were diagnosed as COVID-19 by transnasopharyngeal swab real-time fluorescent reverse transcription-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid examination at different time points after return to Gansu. The first patient was ill on January 21, 2020, with fever as first symptom. She was diagnosed at the Xigu District People’s Hospital in Lanzhou and was transferred to Lanzhou Pulmonary Hospital after being diagnosed. She was cured with one week’s antiviral treatment. The remaining 5 patients were treated in Longxi People’s Hospital. The common clinical symptoms were fever, throat discomfort, headache, and fatigue. Through 7 to 10 days’ antiviral treatment, they all were cured. All patients belonged to common type and had good prognosis.ConclusionThe COVID-19 patients in a non-familial cluster have the same epidemiological history. Early medical observation, SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid examination and comprehensive chest CT should be arranged promptly to make diagnosis and give responsive treatment, so that the prognosis is often good.
According to the requirements for the “three districts and two channels” in the sanitary industry standard Technique Standard for Isolation in Hospitals, combining with the spirit of current documents related to the prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019, in order to guide medical institutions at all levels to conduct standardized design of fever clinics in accordance with the principle of “combining normal time and epidemic period”, this article explains the design points of the fever clinics for the prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019, introduces the specific methods for the fever clinics to achieve “three districts and two channels”, draws a schematic diagram of the fever clinics in general hospitals, and explains the functional layout and medical procedures of the clean area, potential contaminated area, and contaminated area in detail; at the same time, a schematic diagram of the change of fever clinics from “normal” to “during the epidemic” is drawn, and the ideas for the conversion and the process after the conversion are introduced. It proposes design ideas and drawing references for the construction, transformation, and expansion of fever clinics.
Hospital incident command system is a series of management systems for emergencies response of hospitals from the United States. Some hospitals in many countries have applied this system, but it has not yet been applied in China. In the process of responding to the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic, West China Hospital of Sichuan University managed coronavirus disease 2019 patients through a standardized and programmatic model using the concept and framework of hospital incident command system, which included organizing hospital incident management team, carrying out incident action plan, space management, personnel management, material management and information management, in order to carry out standardized and procedural crisis response. This article introduces these management measures of West China Hospital of Sichuan University, aiming to provide a reference for establishing a more complete hospital emergency management system in line with China’s system in the future.
ObjectiveTo investigate a more convenient and safe sampling method for viral nucleic acid detection of coronavirus disease 2019.MethodsAn oropharyngeal swab and nasopharyngeal swab were simultaneously taken from 100 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in a hospital in Wuhan. Then the efficacies of two sampling methods were compared on the positive rates of viral nucleic acid detection.ResultsThe positive rate for SARS-CoV-2 was 54% in oropharyngeal swabs, while 89% positive in nasopharyngeal swabs. There was a significant difference in the detection rate between oropharyngeal swab and nasopharyngeal swab (χ2=3.850 4, P=0.049 7).ConclusionsThe positive rate for nucleic acid testing from nasopharyngeal swabs are significantly better than that from oropharyngeal swabs. Therefore, sampling by nasopharyngeal swabs, rather than oropharyngeal swabs, should be chosen as the preferred virological screening method for patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
Since the establishment in 2016, especially after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, the Hospital Infection Management Quality Control Center of Shuangliu District has carried out quality management and technical ability training for full-time and part-time infection prevention and control personnel through various methods, and used grid management to organize examinations and assessments, inspections and supervision, as well as consultation and assistance. As a result, the culture of infection prevention and control has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, the health administrative departments have increased investment in infrastructure and equipment, the funds for infection prevention and control have continued to increase, and the prevention and control quality of COVID-19 and daily works in the region has been continuously improved. The center plays a leading role in the promotion of the standardization, homogenization, and quality improvement of the prevention and control of hospital infection in the district.
At present, coronavirus disease 2019 has become the most serious public health emergency in the world. The disease is still spreading around the world. The disease progresses rapidly and is highly contagious, causing great harm to the public health security of the world. Based on the research evidence published at home and abroad, this article systematically summarizes the biological structure of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and the pathogenesis, transmission routes and susceptible populations, clinical features and treatment methods of coronavirus disease 2019. It aims to help medical workers understand coronavirus disease 2019 in order to better diagnose and treat the disease, and provide references for future research.
ObjectiveTo investigate the hand hygiene status of nursing staff in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) isolation ward, find out the difficulties and problems in hand hygiene implementation, and then put forward scientific and feasible suggestions to improve the compliance of hand hygiene.MethodsSelf-designed Questionnaire on Hand Hygiene Status of Nursing Staff in COVID-19 Isolation Ward was distributed through the Wenjuanxing, a platform to collect data. The questionnaire, which included general information, knowledge related to hand hygiene, and the status of hand hygiene in isolation ward, was distributed to the nurses working in isolation wards in Wuhan, Hubei Province from March 15th, 2020 to March 22nd, 2020.ResultsValid questionnaires were collected from 492 nurses. The difficulty in performing hand hygiene in the isolation ward was ranked ≥level 3 by 248 nurses (50.41%), the degree of which was divided into 10 levels (level 1 was no difficulty, level 10 was the most difficult). A total of 369 participants (75.00%) thought that wearing gloves for hand disinfection would damage the gloves. There were 161 participants who thought that gloves should be changed every 2 hours, accounting for the largest proportion (32.72%); while 226 participants actually changed gloves every 4 hours, accounting for the largest proportion (45.93%).ConclusionsThe difficulty of performing hand hygiene in isolation ward should be paid attention to. It is recommended to carry out further research on the replacement time of gloves.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), identify the high-risk factors which promoted the disease progression into severe or critical cases, and provide clinical guidance.MethodsNinety-six cases of clinically diagnosed coronavirus disease 2019 were collected and analyzed from General Hospital of the Yangtse River Shipping from January 20 to February 14, 2020. According to clinical classification, those cases were divided into two groups: mild group, including common and mild cases, and severe group including severe and critical cases.ResultsThere were more than half of patients ages>60 years old and severe or critical illness (61.5%, 56.3%), and obese patients accounts for 45.8%, the complication of hypertension accounts for 52.1%. The average time from onset to hospitalization was (6.1±2.6) days, and the average hospitalization days were (15.7±6.3) days. Compared with the mild group, the number of male patients in the severe group was more (57.4% vs. 35.7%, P<0.05), the numbers of elderly patients were larger (77.8% vs. 40.5%, P<0.01), and more obese peoples (55.6% vs. 33.3%, P<0.05). Cough symptom was more common in clinical presentation in the severe group (81.5% vs. 61.9%, P< 0.05). Patients with the complication of hypertension or diabetes occupied a higher proportion in the severe group, which were 64.8% vs. 35.7% and 35.2% vs. 14.3% (P< 0.05), respectively. And the rate of hypoxemia in admission of the severe group was significantly higher (79.6% vs. 9.5%, P< 0.01).ConclusionsThe cases of ages>60 years old and severe or critical illness in coronavirus disease 2019 occupy a higher proportion, and the complication of hypertension accounts for high proportion. Men, ages>60 years old, obese, coughing symptoms, with hypertension and / or diabetes, hypoxemia upon admission are high risk factors for progression into severe and critical cases.