west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Cost-utility" 8 results
  • Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery and Lung Transplantation on End-stage Emphysema

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical effects and health economics of lung volume reduction surgery(LVRS), single lung transplantation(SLTx) and bilateral lung transplantation(BLTx) for patients with end-stage emphysema. Methods A total of 61 patients with end-stage emphysema, including 39 patients who underwent LVRS(LVRS group), 14 patients who underwent SLTx(SLTx group), and 8 patients who underwent BLTx(BLTx group) from September 2002 to August 2008 in Wuxi People’s Hospital, were analyzed retrospectively. Lung function, arterial blood gas analysis and 6-minute walk distance(6-MWD)were assessed before their surgery and 6 months, 1-year and 3-year after their surgery respectively. Their 1-year and 3-year survival rates were observed. Cost-effectiveness analyses were made from a health economics perspective. Results Compared with their preoperative results, their mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV1.0)in LVRS group increased by 75%, 83% and 49% at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 176%, 162% and 100% in SLTx group, and by 260%, 280% and 198% in BLTx group respectively. Their mean forced vital capacity(FVC)in LVRS group increased by 21%, 41% and 40% at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 68% , 73% and 55% in SLTx group, and by 82%, 79% and 89% in BLTx group respectively. Their exercise endurance as measured by 6-MWD increased by 75%, 136% and 111% in LVRS group at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 513%, 677% and 608% in SLTx group, and by 762%, 880% and 741% in BLTx group respectively. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates after operation were 74.40% and 58.90% in LVRS group, 85.80% and 64.30% in SLTxgroup, and 62.50% and 50.00% in BLTx group respectively. The three years’ cost utility of SLTx group was significantly higher than that of BLTx group(1 668.00 vs.1 168.55, P< 0.05)and LVRS group (1 668.00 vs. 549.46, P< 0.05). Conclusion SLTx and BLTx are better than LVRS in improving patients’ lung function and exercise endurance for end-stage emphysema patients. LVRS is more cost-effective than SLTx and BLTx in the early postoperative period. With the development of medical technology and decreased expenses of lung transplantation and immunosuppressive agents, lung transplantation will become the first surgical choice for end-stage emphysema patients.

    Release date:2016-08-30 05:49 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Coflex Interspinous Dynamic Reconstruction and 360° Fusion for Single Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Cost-utility Analysis

    Objective From the viewpoint of health economics, to analyse the cost-utility of Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and 360° fusion in the treatment of single level lumbar degenerative disease, so as to provide references to doctors and patients for making the best solution. Methods From October 2008 to November 2010, a prospective non-randomized controlled study was carried out on the patients diagnosed as L4-L5 degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, of whom Group A were treated by posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and Group B accepted lumbar 360° fusion treatment. The SF-36 questionnaire was used to survey the life quality of patients and to calculate the quality-adjusted life year (QALY); meanwhile, the costs of the treatment were collected to compare the cost-utility ratio between the two groups. Results A total of 60 patients were included, among whom 29 patients including 20 males and 9 females were in Group A, and the other 31 patients including 16 males and 15 females were in Group B; and the mean time of follow-up was 16.4 months (12-23 months). The average age of Group A and Group B was 45.1 years (21-67 years) and 56.2 years (32-86 years), respectively; the medical costs were 51 509.9±2 422.9 yuan and 57 409.7±9 072.9 yuan, respectively; the life quality compared with that of pre-operation improved by 42.60% and 42.82%, respectively; the cost-utility ratios were 69165.6±4716.0 yuan/QALY and 77 976.7±12 757.4 yuan/QALY, respectively. For each increase of one QALY, Group A could save 12.74% of the cost compared with Group B. Conclusion Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction has the equal short-term effects to lumbar 360° fusion in the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, but it has lower costs than the latter, and is more in line with the requirements of health economics.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:06 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A Prospective Cost-Utility Study of Early Renal Replacement Therapy

    Objective To assess the cost-utility study of renal transplantation compared with nemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods A prospective study of end-stage renal disease patients was followed up for 3 months after renal replacement therapy. The study population included 196 patients (renal transplant [RT] n=63, hemodialysis [HD] n=82 and continious ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD] n=51) from 6 hospitals of Sichuan province. Health-related quality of life was assessed by using the WHOQOL-BRIEF questionnaire. Utility scores were obtained so as to conduct CUA (cost-utility analysis). Costs were collected from financial department and by patient interview. Results The utility values were 0.539 9± 0.013 for RT, 0.450 8± 0.014 for HD, 0.512 2±0.099 for CAPD, respectively. The mean direct cost of the first three months of renal transplant was significantly higher than dialysis (RT and CAPD). Over 3 months, the average cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for patients after CAPD was lower than HD and RT. Compared to HD, incremental cost analysis showed that CAPD was more ecnomical than RT. Sensitive analysis showed that CAPD was more effective than RT when ΔQALY varied in the limit of 95% confidence interval. However, the cost-utility of RT vs HD and CAPD vs HD was varied with ΔQALY level. Conclusions Cost-utility analysis showed that CAPD was a more favorable cost-utility ratio when compared to RT at early stage RT vs HD and CAPD vs HD, but which cost-utility ratio is better, we can not draw a certain conclusion.

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:28 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Census versus High-risk Population Screening for Tuberculosis in Mianyan City: A Health Economics Evaluation

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of health economics of census versus high-risk population screening for tuberculosis in Mianyan city, in order to provide references for the selection of suitable tuberculosis screening method in western region of China. MethodsWe included active tuberculosis patients by residents health screening of 21 villages and towns in Mianyan city from June 2013 to March 2013. Relevant data was analyzed by referencing the National Assessment of Tuberculosis Control Program in 2001-2010. Results184047 residents were screened by tuberculosis census and 128 active tuberculosis patients were diagnosed while 61045 residents were screened by high-risk population screening and 76 active tuberculosis patients were diagnosed. The cost-utility ratio and benefit-cost ratio of tuberculosis census were 6174.17 and 3.84, respectively. The cost-utility ratio and benefit-cost ratio of high risk population screening were 3106.16 and 7.62, respectively. ConclusionHigh-risk population screening has higher cost-utility ratio and benefit-cost ratio than tuberculosis census with higher missed diagnosis. Benefits and harms of tuberculosis detection rate and cost should be fully balanced before tuberculosis screening method were chosen in western underdeveloped region of China.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Health economic analysis of five nucleic acid detection systems based on electrochemical biosensors

    ObjectivesThis study aimed to study the economic effect of five kinds of detection systems for nucleic acid, which were based on five kinds of working electrodes: gold electrode, glassy carbon electrode, carbon paste electrode, screen printing electrode, and indium-tin-oxide (ITO) glass electrode.MethodsThe cost of completing a single test was taken as the cost of economic analysis. The Youden index was used to represent the effect of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Meanwhile, the cost-utility analysis (CUA) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were used for the economic analysis of the corresponding system.ResultsThe cost of five detection systems based on gold electrode, glass carbon electrode, carbon paste electrode, screen printing electrode, and ITO glass electrode was 3.70 yuan/unit, 4.20 yuan/unit, 5.25 yuan/unit, 33.98 yuan/unit and 5.01 yuan/unit, respectively. The Youden indexes of all five systems were 1. The cost effectiveness (C/E) were 3.70, 4.20, 5.25, 33.98, and 5.01, respectively. The cost utility (C/U) were 6.61, 6.89, 9.91, 62.93, and 9.45, respectively. The C'/E and C'/U of the gold electrode detection system were the minimum (2.96 and 5.29). Compared with the system applying the gold electrode, the system using the glassy carbon electrode had ΔC >0 and ∆E0 >0; When carbon paste electrode, screen printing electrode, and ITO glass electrode system were used, ∆C was >0 and ∆E0 was <0.ConclusionsFrom the perspective of CEA and CUA, the system using the gold electrode has the best economic effect. The sensitivity analysis proved the reliability of CEA and CUA results. According to the ICER, gold electrode or glassy carbon electrode can be used in clinical practice with the choice depending on the user.

    Release date:2019-11-19 10:03 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer in China: a health economic evaluation

    ObjectivesTo evaluate the economic efficacy of nab-paclitaxel (NAB-P) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) versus GEM alone in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in China.MethodsA Markov model simulating the costs and health outcomes was developed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The impact of parameter uncertainty on the model was assessed by deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis.ResultsNAB-P combined with GEM was shown superior efficacy compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, however with higher costs. The ICER between the two groups was 964 780.79¥/QALY.ConclusionsCompared with gemcitabine monotherapy, NAB-P combined with GEM is not cost-effective. The conclusion is confirmed by deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis.

    Release date:2019-09-10 02:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Cost-utility analysis of first-generation EGFR-TKIs as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

    Objective To compare the long-term cost-utility of three first-generation EGFR-TKIs targeted drugs, gefitinib, icotinib, and erlotinib as first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Real-world data were collected from 1 511 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-generation EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2009 to 2019. A three-state Markov model was established to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and cost-utility of three first-generation EGFR-TKIs targeted drugs. The transition probability of each state was obtained by survival analysis, the direct and indirect costs were calculated by the bottom-up method, the health utility value was obtained through literature research, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated, and sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Results There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy among the three first-generation EGFR-TKIs in the treatment of NSCLC. The incidence of skin rash and liver injury caused by gefitinib was significantly higher than that caused by icotinib and erlotinib (P<0.05). The average economic burden of patients treated with icotinib was the lowest (CNY 192 535.3) (P<0.01). The cost-utility ratio of icotinib (CNY 132 985.9/QALYs) was much lower than that of gefitinib (CNY 205 005.3/QALYs) and erlotinib (CNY 172 893.1/QALYs). Conclusion Compared with the three first-generation EGFR-TKIs drugs, icotinib is the most cost-effective.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Dupilumab injection in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the economics of duplizumab in combination with optimal supportive care versus optimal supportive care for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults from the perspective of our health system. MethodsA Markov model embedded in a decision tree was constructed to compare the long-term cost-utility of dupilumab combined with optimal supportive care versus optimal supportive care, and a sensitivity analysis was performed on the results. ResultsThe results of the basic analysis showed that compared with the optimal supportive care, dupliyuzumab in combination with optimal supportive care resulted in 3.82 more QALYs, while its cost was 125 549.42 yuan more. The ICER was 32 854.83 yuan/QALY, which was less than one times China's per capita GDP in 2022, and was economical. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that factors such as Dupilumab-16-week post - no response utility value, Dupilumab-52-week post response rate and Dupilumab-52-week adherence had a greater impact on the cost changes. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a stable model structure and good robustness. ConclusionIn adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, dupliyuzumab in combination with an optimal supportive care regimen is more cost-effective compared to an optimal supportive care regimen.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content