目的 了解糖尿病患者院外自行注射胰岛素存在的风险。 方法 2010年1月－12月，通过随访调查老年组83例，中青年组69例糖尿病患者院外自行注射胰岛素的实施情况，对存在的问题进行归类、统计。调查的内容主要包括3个方面：胰岛素装置的正确使用、胰岛素的规范注射、血糖监测及低血糖处理。分析两组患者院外注射胰岛素的风险，并对存在的问题进行原因分析、提出解决方法。 结果 发放调查表152份，有效回收131份，其中老年组73份，中青年组58份。在胰岛素装置使用方面，老年组存在问题48项，中青年组27项，两者间差异无统计学意义（χ2=2.432，P＞0.05）。在胰岛素的规范注射方面，老年组存在问题176项，中青年组77项，老年组在胰岛素注射方面存在的问题明显高于中青年组（χ2=25.009，P＜0.001）。在低血糖的认识及正确处理上，老年组存在问题115项，中青年组33项，两组差异具有统计学意义（χ2=40.383，P＜0.001）。 结论 糖尿病患者院外自行注射胰岛素存在诸多风险。老年糖尿病患者院外胰岛素注射需在他人协助、监督下进行。
【摘要】 目的 探讨类风湿关节炎患者家属的健康教育需求及获得健康教育的途径。 方法 2007年6月-2009年5月，我科健康教育小组采用问卷调查法对96名类风湿关节炎患者家属进行健康教育需求调查，调查内容包括家属对类风湿疾病相关知识的了解程度、健康教育需求及获得知识的途径。 结果 本组患者家属普遍对类风湿关节炎的护理知识认识不够，最希望了解类风湿关节炎药物治疗、功能锻炼、饮食及心理指导的相关知识；电视、广播等媒体的宣传和电话咨询是其获得类风湿关节炎疾病相关知识的主要途径；对获得健康教育途径的选择具有多样性。 结论 类风湿关节炎患者家属普遍缺乏类风湿关节炎相关护理知识，开展多种形式的健康教育是完全必要的。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the requirement and paths of health education on the family members of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods From June 2007 to May 2009, family members of 96 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were investigated with questionnaire. The questions included the knowledge of rheumatoid arthritis, health education requirement and the path to obtain the knowledge. Results The family members of the patients knew a few of the nursing knowledge of rheumatoid arthritis. They wanted to know about the medication for rheumatoid arthritis, functional practice, diet and psychological instruction. The paths of obtaining the knowledge were various. Conclusion The family members of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis lack the knowledge of nursing rheumatoid arthritis; it is necessary to give the health education to the family members in various ways.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the progress of different methods for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and provide a clinical reference for treatment of ACL rupture.MethodsThe literature about the femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction was widely reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages and the clinical results of each method were summarized.ResultsCurrently in ACL reconstruction, methods for femoral tunnel positioning include transtibial technique (TT), anteromedial technique (AM), outside-in (OI), modified TT (mTT), and computer assisted surgery. There is no significant difference in the postoperative effectiveness between TT technique and AM technique. Compared with the TT technique, the OI technique has higher rotational stability of knee, but there is no significant difference in clinical results. The femoral tunnel located by mTT technique is closer to the anatomical placement than that of TT technique, but mTT technique is not effective for systematically anatomic femoral tunnel positioning, and further research is needed to prove its advantages.ConclusionDifferent femoral tunnel positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no definite evidence that one is superior than the rest.