Objective To observe and measure the approach next to the erector spinae in the thoracic and lumbar segments of the spine and adjacent anatomical structures by the topographic method, to clarify the positioning method and safe range so as to provide the anatomical basis of the approach for spinal canal decompression. Methods Twelve formaldehyde-treated adult cadaver specimens were selected, including 6 males and 6 females with an average age of 43 years (range, 27-52 years) and with an average height of 166 cm (range, 154-177 cm). The related data of the approach at T1-S1 levels were respectively measured: the distance between the lateral edge of the erector spinae and the spinous process, the length of the approach, the angle between the approach and the horizontal plane, the size of intervertebral foramen, and the vertical distance between the segmental artery and the upper edge of the vertebrae. Results The distance between the lateral edge of the erector spinae and the spinous process ranged from (41.75 ± 3.29) mm to (74.54 ± 7.08) mm. The length of the approach ranged from (66.75 ± 10.81) mm to (97.13 ± 13.35) mm. The angle between the approach and the horizontal plane ranged from (38.38 ± 6.16)° to (53.67 ± 4.40)°. The vertical distance between the segmental artery and the upper edge of the vertebrae ranged from (9.50 ± 0.60) mm to (18.30 ± 1.56) mm. The size of foraminal was also measured. The spinal canal could reach when iliocostalis lateral edge was used as the starting point in the lumbar segments, and longissimus lateral edge as the starting point in the thoracic segments. It was confirmed that there was enough safe space for the spinal decompression without the resection of the articular process. Conclusion The approach next to the erector spinae can reach spinal canal to achieve the purpose of decompression through the intervertebral foramen. The minimally invasive approach is feasible and safe. It has the value of the operative application.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral fracture according to comparative study. Methods Between March 2006 and August 2007, 60 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures were treated. Kyphoplasty was performed in 40 patients (test group) and conservative treatment was performed in 20patients as control (control group). In test group, there were 6 males and 34 females with an average age of 68.7 years (range, 56-78 years). The disease duration was 10-18 months (mean, 12 months). A total of 73 vertebral bodies fractured. In control group, there were 5 males and 15 females with an average age of 70.1 years (range, 57-80 years). The disease duration was 9-16 months (mean, 13 months). A total of 41 vertebral bodies fractured. There was no significant difference in the general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention in test group, and no leakage of bone cement occurred. The patients of 2 groups were followed up 36-38 months. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) questionnaire scores, anterior and middle vertebral column heights, and Cobb angles of test group at 1-3 days, 12 and 36 months after treatment were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P lt; 0.05); but there was no significant difference between before treatment and after treatment in control group (P gt; 0.05). After 12 and 36 months, the VAS scores, EVOS scores, anterior and middle vertebral column heights, and Cobb angles of test group were better than those of control group (P lt; 0.05). The incidence of vertebral re-fractures was higher in control group than in test group after 36 months (χ2=16.347, P=0.015). Conclusion Kyphoplasty can effectively rel ieve pain and restore the function after the procedure. The risk of vertebral re-fractures after kyphoplasty can be reduced in comparison with conservative treatment.
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of anterolateral decompression and three column reconstruction through posterior approach for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fracture. Methods Between March 2009 and October 2011, 39 patients with unstable burst thoracolumbar fracture were treated. Of them, there were 32 males and 7 females, with an average age of 43.8 years (range, 25-68 years). The injury causes included falling from height in 17 cases, bruise in 10 cases, traffic accident in 4 cases, and other in 8 cases. The fracture was located at the T10 level in 1 case, T11 in 9 cases, T12 in 6 cases, L1 in 14 cases, L2 in 7 cases, L3 in 1 case, and L4 in 1 case. According to Frankel classification before operation, 5 cases were classified as grade A, 5 as grade B, 9 as grade C, 14 as grade D, and 6 as grade E. Before operation, the vertebral kyphosis Cobb angle was (26.7 ± 7.1)°; vertebral height loss was 37.5% ± 9.5%; and the space occupying of vertebral canal was 73.7% ± 11.3%. The time between injury and operation was 1-4 days (mean, 2.5 days). All patients underwent anterolateral decompression of spinal canal by posterior approach and three column reconstruction. After operation, the vertebral height restoration, correction of kyphosis, decompression of the spinal canal, and the recovery of nerve function were evaluated. Results Increase of paraplegic level, urinary infection, and pressure sore occurred in 1 case, 1 case, and 2 cases, respectively; no incision infection or neurological complications was observed in the other cases, primary healing of incision was obtained. The patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 27 months). The patients had no aggravation of pain of low back after operation; no loosening and breaking of screws and rods occurred; no titanium alloys electrolysis and titanium cage subsidence or breakage was observed. The imaging examination showed that complete decompression of the spinal canal, satisfactory restoration of the vertebral height, and good physiological curvature of spine at 2 years after operation. At last follow-up, 1 case was classified as Frankel grade A, 2 as grade B, 2 as grade C, 10 as grade D, and 24 as grade E, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative one (Plt; 0.05). At immediate after operation and last follow-up, the Cobb angle was (6.3 ± 2.1)° and (6.5 ± 2.4)° respectively; the vertebral height loss was 7.9% ± 2.7% and 8.2% ± 3.0% respectively; and the indexes were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The technique of anterolateral decompression and three column reconstruction through posterior approach is one perfect approach to treat unstable thoracolumbar fracture because of complete spinal cord canal decompression, three column reconstruction, and immediate recovery of the spinal stability after operation.