Abstract: Objective To summarize the experience of combined coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) and valve replacement. Methods From May 1997 to March 2006, the results of 80 consecutive patients undergone valve replacement (MVR) and CABG were analyzed. CABG were performed withtotal grafts in 159 grafts (mean 1.99 grafts), with mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 49 patients, with aortic valve replacement (AVR) in 18 patients, with MVR+AVR in 13 patients(mechanical valve replacement in 68 and biological valve replacement in 12). Results The hospital time after operation was 19.2±13.4d. The hospital mortality rate was 12.5% (10/80). The primary cause of death included low cardiac output yndrome, acute renal failure, nervous system complications ,ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest. Multivariate testing of preoperative and operative description identified that preoperative myocardial infarction, worse cardiac function, radiographic cardiac enlargement and low ejection fraction were associated with an increase of hospital mortality (P＜0.05). There were postoperative complications including bleeding, severe ventricular arrhythmia, nervous system complications and incision infection. Followup of 58 patients (82.86%, range 6 to 60 months) showed the symptoms of angina pectoris and heart failure were significantly relieved. There were 2 longterm deaths (cerebral infarction and lung infection). Conclusion Combined CABG and valve replacement is an effective way for treatment of coronary artery and valvular heart disease. Improving the heart function preoperatively, strengthening myocardial protection, shortening operation and myocardial ischemia time, and complete revascularization are the key factors for success operation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of internal fixation with headless compression hollow embedding screws in the treatment of intraarticular fracture of elbow.MethodsBetween March 2012 and September 2018, 12 patients with intraarticular fracture of elbow were treated with internal fixation with headless compression hollow embedding screws. There were 7 males and 5 females with an average age of 50.3 years (range, 22-65 years). Cause of injury included falling in 7 cases, falling from high places in 4 cases, and traffic accident in 1 case. Ten patients were distal humerus fractures which were classified as type 13-B3 in 8 cases and type 13-C3 in 2 cases according to the International Association of Internal Fixation Research (AO/ASIF). Two patients were radial head fractures which were classified as type Ⅲ according to the modified Mason classifications. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 8.25±0.83. The time from injury to operation was 3-5 days (mean, 3.7 days).ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. All 12 patients were followed up 6-15 months, with an average of 8.4 months. The results of X-ray films and CT examination showed that the fracture ends were anatomic reduction, and the fractures healed at 6-11 months after operation, with an average of 7.8 months. One patient had heterotopic ossification at 4 months after operation. The VAS scores were 5.17±0.79 at 2 weeks after operation and 0.50±0.50 at last follow-up. There were significant differences between the time points (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow function score was 68-95, with an average of 83.9. The activity of elbow joint recovered.ConclusionThe intraarticular fracture of elbow can be firmly fixed by the headless compression hollow embedding screw, which can allow the early functional training of the elbow joint, reduce the incidence of heterotopic ossification, and obtain good effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of segmentectomy and lobectomy for ≤2 cm lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid subtype negative by intraoperative frozen sections.MethodsThe patients with adenocarcinoma who received segmentectomy or lobectomy in multicenter from June 2020 to March 2021 were included. They were divided into two groups according to a random number table, including a segmentectomy group (n=119, 44 males and 75 females with an average age of 56.6±8.9 years) and a lobectomy group (n=115, 43 males and 72 females with an average of 56.2±9.5 years). The clinical data of the patients were analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). No perioperative death was found. There was no statistical difference in the operation time (111.2±30.0 min vs. 107.3±34.3 min), blood loss (54.2±83.5 mL vs. 40.0±16.4 mL), drainage duration (2.8±0.6 d vs. 2.6±0.6 d), hospital stay time (3.9±2.3 d vs. 3.7±1.1 d) or pathology staging (P>0.05) between the two groups. The postoperative pulmonary function analysis revealed that the mean decreased values of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second percent predicted in the segmentectomy group were significantly better than those in the lobectomy group (0.2±0.3 L vs. 0.4±0.3 L, P=0.005; 0.3%±8.1% vs. 2.9%±7.4%, P=0.041).ConclusionSegmentectomy is effective in protecting lungs function, which is expected to improve life quality of patients.