Objective To summarize the experiences of the breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Methods From March 2000 to March 2005, 18 cases of breast defects were treated. Defect wascaused by mammary cancer in 17 cases and by Poland’s syndrome in 1 case. Preoperative radiotherapy was given in 7 patients. The size of the chest wall defects ranged from 25 cm×20 cm to 12 cm×8 cm. All the breasts were reconstructed with the DIEP flaps. The flap size ranged from 35 cm×22 cm to 12 cm×8 cm (mean 9.58 cm×26.85 cm). The internal mammary vessels were used as the recipient vessels in 15 patients who underwent delayed breast reconstruction. Among these cases, the bilateral deep inferior epigastric vessels were anastomosed with the proximal and distal ends of the internal mammary vessels separately in 13 cases and only unilateral deep inferior epigastric vessels were harvested and anastomosed to the proximal ends of the internal mammary vessels in 2 cases. The recipient vessels were the thoracodorsal vessels and thoracodorsal vessels plus the circumflex scapular vessels in the patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction. Results Sixteen flaps survived completely postoperatively and the survival rate was 89%. Flap necrosis occurred in 2 patients; one underwent radiotherapy preoperatively while the other did not. The distal 1/3 portion of the flap necrosed in the patient with Poland’s syndrome. Nipple reconstruction and breast remolding were performed in 2 patients. Partial dehiscence of the median abdominal incision occurred in 2 patients at 2 weeks postoperatively and were repaired with resuturing andsplit-thickness skin grafting separately. Conclusion Breast reconstruction using the DIEP flaps not only can preserve the advantages of the traditional method using the transverse rectus ablominis myocutaneous flaps, but also can retain the maximal function of the rectus abdominal muscle and prevent the occurrence of abdominal weakness and hernia. It is an ideal method of the breast reconstruction.
Objective To evaluate a new alternative method for thereconstruction of vagina with deep inferior epigastric perforator(DIEP) flap. Methods From January 2004 to May 2005, DIEP flaps were used for vaginal reconstruction in 5 patients(19 to 40 years), including 4 cases of congenital vaginal agenesis and 1 case of vaginal tumor. Before operation, the perforators were detected by theDoppler and the flaps based on the perforators ranged from 10 cm×9 cm to 12 cm×11 cm. DIEP flaps were elevated and then transferred to reconstruct the vagina. Results Deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps were used in 5 patients. Only 1 patient developed haematoma in the posterior aspect of thereconstructed vagina, but the flap was viable. The wounds healed secondarily after conservative therapy. All the flaps survived completely. No complication occurred at donor site of abdominal wall. Conclusion Despite technical difficulties in elevatingthe deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, the flap is a good choice for vaginal reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibil ity and rel iabil ity of rib-sparing technique for internal mammary vessels exposure and anastomosis in breast reconstruction and thoracic wall repair with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. MethodsBetween November 2009 and September 2011, 11 female patients with post-mastectomy deformities were treated. The mean age was 42 years (range, 33-65 years). Of them, 10 patients underwent breast reconstruction with the DIEP flaps, and 1 patient received defect repair for chronic thoracic wall irradiated ulcer with the DIEP flap. The size of the flap ranged from 18 cm×9 cm to 28 cm×12 cm. Rib-sparing technique was applied in all these cases. The internal mammary vessels were exposed by dissection intercostal space and anastomosed with the deep inferior epigastric vessels. The donor sites were closed directly in all cases. ResultsIn all cases, the rib-sparing technique for internal mammary vessels exposure and anastomosis was successfully performed. The mean time for internal mammary vessels exposure was 52 minutes (range, 38-65 minutes). The mean exposure length of the internal mammary vessels was 1.7 cm (range, 1.3-2.2 cm). All flaps survived completely postoperatively, and wounds and incisions at donor sites healed primarily. All patients were followed up 8-26 months (mean, 12 months). All patients were satisfied with the reconstructive outcomes. No collapse deformity or discomfort of the thoracic wall occurred. ConclusionThe rib-sparing technique for internal mammary vessels exposure and anastomosis is a rel iable and reproducible approach to reconstruct the breast and repair the thoracic wall with DIEP flap, and it can reduce collapse deformity of the thoracic wall.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for extreme defects around the knee. Methods Between June 2017 and December 2018, 15 patients with the extreme defects around the knee were admitted. There were 9 males and 6 females with a median age of 36 years (range, 23-51 years). The etiology was the traffic accident in 7 cases, tumor in 5 cases, and burn in 3 cases. The injured location was left knee in 8 cases and right knee in 7 cases. The size of soft tissue defects ranged from 15 cm×10 cm to 30 cm×20 cm, and all defects complicated with exposure of blood vessels, nerves, tendons, and other tissues. Transverse DIEP flaps with 1-2 vascular pedicles were prepared according to the size of the defect, including 6 cases of single-pedicle flaps and 9 cases of double-pedicle conjoined flaps. According to the depth of the defect, 10 cases of skin flaps were thinned under microscope. The size of the DIEP flaps ranged from 16 cm×10 cm to 32 cm×20 cm; the average thickness was 1.5 cm (range, 0.8-1.8 cm); the average pedicle length was 7.5 cm (range, 5.0-9.0 cm). The donor site was directly sutured. Results One single-pedicle flap developed distal necrosis after operation, and healed after skin grafting; the other skin flaps survived, and the wounds at the donor and recipient sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 16-28 months (mean, 24 months). The shape and texture of the flap were satisfactory, and there was no abnormal hair growth or obvious pigmentation. There was only linear scar at the donor site and no complication such as abdominal hernia. The appearance and function of the knee were satisfactory. No recurred tumor was observed, and the scar contracture was released. At last follow-up, 13 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good, according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) criteria. Conclusion The DIEP flap is an ideal alternative for repairing the extreme defects around knee, with a concealed donor site, easy dissection, flexible design, as well as less complication.