ObjectiveTo retrospectively compare the mid-term effectiveness between by direct anterior approach (DAA) and by posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsBetween January 2009 and December 2010, 110 patients (110 hips) treated with THA and followed up more than 5 years were chosen in the study. THA was performed on 55 patients by DAA (DAA group), and on 55 patients by posterolateral approach (PL group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, types of hip joint disease, and preoperative Harris score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, amount of bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and the Harris scores were recorded and compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and length of hospital stay between 2 groups (t=0.145, P=0.876; t=1.305, P=0.093). The amount of bleeding was significantly less in DAA group than in PL group (t=2.314, P=0.032). All patients were followed up 5-7 years (mean, 5.97 years). Complications happened in 5 cases (9.1%) of DAA group and in 3 cases (5.5%) of PL group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between 2 groups (χ2=0.539, P=0.463). There was significant difference in Harris scores at 6 months after operation between 2 groups (t=2.296, P=0.014), but no significant difference was found in Harris score at 1 year and 5 years between 2 groups (t=1.375, P=0.130; t=0.905, P=0.087). Further analysis, at 6 months after operation, the joint function score in DAA group was significantly higher than that in PL group (t=1.087, P=0.034), while there was no significant difference in the pain score and range of motion score between 2 groups (t=1.872, P=0.760; t=1.059, P=0.091).ConclusionTHA by DAA has the advantages of less bleeding and faster recovery. The short-term effectiveness is superior to the THA by traditional posterolateral approach, but there is no obvious advantage in the mid-term effectiveness.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach (DAA) and by posterolateral approach, and to investigate the application value of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Methods The clinical data of 65 patients who underwent one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by DAA or posterolateral approach between June 2010 and November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. DAA was used in 34 cases (group A) and posterolateral approach was used in 31 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, etiology, disease duration, preoperative Harris score, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P>0.05) with comparability. The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, hospitalization time, early postoperative complications, Harris score, and VAS score were recorded and compared between 2 groups. The simple Likert scale method was applied to evaluate the patient satisfaction, and the imaging evaluation was used. Results The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and hospitalization time of group A were significantly less than those of group B (P<0.05). The patients were followed up 15-48 months (mean, 25.3 months) in group A and 12-51 months (mean, 27.6 months) in group B. The overall incidence of complications related to surgery in group A (10.29%) was significantly lower than that of group B (19.35%) (χ2=8.769, P=0.023). The acetabular anteversion and abduction angle were in the normal range of 2 groups except 1 hip (1.47%) of group A had a higher acetabular anteversion than normal value. Unstable fixed prosthesis happened in 1 hip of groups A and B respectively, and the remaining femoral calcar had no obvious bone resorption and fixed stably. The Harris score and VAS score at each time point after operation of 2 groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), and the differences between the time points after operation were also significant (P<0.05). The Harris score at 1 and 3 months after operation and the VAS score at 3 days after operation of group A were significantly better than those of group B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found at last follow-up between 2 groups (P>0.05). According to the simple Likert scale method to analyze patient satisfaction, comprehensive satisfaction of group A (97.1%, 33/34) was significantly higher than that of group B (67.7%, 21/31) (χ2=10.343, P=0.001). Conclusion The application of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty can significantly relieve the pain, accelerate the recovery of hip joint function, and improve the patient satisfaction. But in clinical application, more attentions should be paid to strictly grasp the indications and prevent the early complications. The long-term effectiveness needs to be further observed.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach (DAA) and direct lateral approach (DLA). MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO databases or websites were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DAA and DLA for THA from inception to August 6th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 9 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that at 3 months post-operation, the Harris hip score (HHS) of the DAA group was higher than the DLA group (MD=4.83, 95%CI 2.09 to 7.56, P=0.000 5). Besides, compared with the DLA group, the DAA group showed shorter incision length (MD=−2.35, 95%CI −3.90 to −0.79, P=0.003), less intraoperative bleeding (MD=−68.24, 95%CI −119.07 to −17.41, P=0.009), and shorter hospital stay (MD=−0.84, 95%CI −1.54 to −0.15, P=0.02). However, no significant differences were found between DLA and DAA in operation duration and HHS at 6 weeks after operation. ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that DAA can provide better HHS at 3 months post-operation, shorter incision length, less intraoperative bleeding, and shorter hospitalization length than DLA. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.