Objective To investigate the rural residents’ payment will for disease control and its influencing factors, so as to provide evidence for the government to make policy of combing disease control and New Rural Co-operative Medical system (NRCMS). Methods The self-designed questionnaire was adopted to investigate 1 117 rural residents from 156 villages, 44 towns, 19 counties (cities, districts) in Henan province. The frequency analysis and the multiple logistic regression analysis were conducted by using SPSS 11.5 software. Results On the basis of NRCMS payment, 68.3% of the rural residents were willing to pay extra for disease control, 62.3% of whom were willing to pay RMB 1.00 or more, and the average willing payment were RMB 3.01±7.66. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the people willing to pay extra were as follows: self-employed, graduates from a secondary technical school, dink family, and the respondents who believed NRCMS had relieved their medical financial burden. Conclusion In practicing the rural public health policy of combining disease control and NRCMS, it is suggested to ask rural residents to pay a little extra money on the basis of current NRCMS payment. The foundation of bringing this policy into force is to keep practicing NRCMS well so as to relieve more financial burdens for rural residents. During the implementation, low income families should be taken into consideration according to their occupation, educational level and family structure.
Objective To investigate the attitude and its influencing factors of Henan provincial rural residents towards the partial usage of funds from the New Rural Co-operative Medical System (NRCMS) for the disease control and prevention, in order to provide evidence for policy making. Methods In Henan province, 1 117 rural residents were randomly sampled with questionnaire from the 156 villages distributing in 44 townships of 19 counties (cities, districts). The frequency analyses, the multiple linear regression analysis and the one-way analysis of variance were conducted. Results Among all the respondents, only 3.4% of the rural residents absolutely disagreed (Zero agreement degree score), 34.4% fully agreed (10 agreement degree scores), and 90.6% had agreement degree scores equal to or more than five. The agreement degree was direct proportional to NRCMS satisfaction degree. The agreement degrees from residents who were relieved from medical financial burdens by NRCMS were higher than the others. 13.2% of rural residents believed that NRCMS did not alleviate their medical financial burden. For the men and women who believed that their village general practitioner was timely at vaccination, their agreement degree was higher than the others who considered vaccination time was late or common. The “timely group” was alone a subset. The “late group” and the “common group” were homogeneous subsets. The proportion of those who answered that the vaccination timeliness at late or common reached 40.6%. Conclusion The proposition to pay funds from the existing NRCMS for disease control and prevention is in line with the will of the majority of rural residents. The combination of disease control and prevention and NRCMS is a strategy in rural healthcare management. A bettering NRCMS and disease control and prevention are the basis of this policy in the future. More attention should be paid to the timeliness of the village general practitioners’ disease control work. It is necessary to perfect the NRCMS policy focusing on residents who hasn’t been relieved from medical financial burdens, so that more population will be benefited.
ObjectiveTo analyze the impact of high-quality nursing care on adult patients with asthma and asthma control. MethodsWe randomly chose 100 patients with asthma from June 2012 to July 2013, and the patients were randomly divided into experimental group (n=50) and control group (n=50). Patients in both the two groups received treatments based on the characteristics of the patients' condition. The control group received conventional care, while the experimental group received high-quality nursing care aimed to help them establish the concept of Asthma Prevention on the basis of the conventional care. Then, we analyzed the effect of nursing intervention in both groups. ResultsBefore the treatment, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%) and peak expiratory flow were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, both groups had improvement in their lung function. However, improvement in lung function of the experimental group was significantly better than the control group (P<0.05). The disease remission level in the experiment group and the control group was respectively 86.0% (43/50) and 64.0% (32/50) (χ2=6.453, P=0.011). According to the Asthma Control Questionnare (5-item version), in the experimental group, 46 patients completed the assessment and the total control of asthma accounted for 34.8% (16/46), well-controlled asthma accounted for 50.0% (23/46), and uncontrolled asthma accounted for 15.2% (7/46); while in the control group, 48 patients completed the assessment and the total control of asthma accounted for 18.8% (9/48), well-controlled asthma accounted for 43.8% (21/48), and uncontrolled asthma accounted for 37.5% (18/48) (Z=-2.533, P=0.011). The average hospital stay for the experimental group and the control group was respectively 11.24 days and 12.16 days. ConclusionHigh-quality nursing care can improve the quality of life of adult asthma patients, improve the patients' lung function, and enhance the control of asthma.
This paper reviews the implementation of disease prevention and control policy of Sichuan province in three historic stages, and analyses the situation, challenges and tasks about disease prevention and controlling in future, based on the new requirements about hygiene and medicine. Three strategies should be taken: 1) to improve the capacity and quality of health service; 2) to optimize the structure of institutions and talent teams; 3) to focus on the Healthy Sichuan construction, the treatment-prevention synergy, and the poverty health care.