Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of periosteal autograft in repair of ankylosis of elbow joint. Methods From May 1985 to November 1999, 18 cases of elbow joints ankylosis (6 cases of osteo-ankylosis, 12 cases of fibroankylosis) were treated by repairing articular surface with periosteal autografting. Out of 18 cases, 13 were caused by old dislocation and fracture of elbow joints, 3 by late rheumatoid arthritis, and 2 by old total joint tuberculosis. In this surgical approach, periosteum from upper end of tibia was transplanted into articular surface after correction of the elbow joint from ankylosis deformity, and continuous passive or active movement of the operated joint was adopted with skeletal traction through olecranon of ulna for 4 weeks after operation. All of the cases were followed up for 1-9 years, 5.2 years on average, before clinical evaluation. Results The elbow joints in 11 cases were restored to normal, the joints in 4 cases obtained active movement in the range of 100°-0°, and thejoints in the other 3 cases could only have limited movement because of severe muscular atrophy. Conclusion The articular surface in arthroplasty of elbow joint ankylosis could be effectively repaired by periosteal autograft, and the function of the joints could be obviously improved by continuous movement of the joints after operation with skeletal traction.
Objective To evaluate the short-term results of reconstruction of stiff elbow under arthroscopy technique in patients with elbow osteoarthritis. Methods Between March 2006 and March 2009, 38 cases of elbow osteoarthritis with contracture were treated under arthroscopy technique. There were 26 males and 12 females with an average age of 47.8 years (range, 26-66 years). Unilateral side was affected in all cases, including 13 cases at the left side and 25 at the right side with 30 patients on the dominant side. The disease duration was more than 6 months. X-ray examination showed that 31 patients had free body, and 28 had osteophytosis. Seven patients had ulnar neuritis. The arthroscopy functional reconstruction was performed including synovectomy, free body removal, and osteocapsular arthroplasty. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 6-10 months (mean, 8 months). Transient radial nerve injury occurred in 1 case, re-adhesion of elbow joint in 1 case, and heterotopic ossification of brachial ulnar joint in 1 case at 6 months after operation. In 1 patient compl icated by ulnar neuritis, the disorder of ulnar nerve was not improved, nervous symptoms disappeared after the re-operation of ulnar nerve relaxation after 2 months. The range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at 3 and 6 months had significant differences when compared with those before operation (P lt; 0.05), but had no significant difference between two time points after operation (P gt; 0.05). According to MEPS functional criteria, the results were classified as excellent in 20 cases, good in 15 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case at 6 months after operation, and the excellent and good rate was 92.1%. No new free body or osteophytosis occurred after operation by X-ray examination. Conclusion The arthroscopy is an effective technique to reconstruct the function of stiff elbow, which can obviously improve the range of motion and the function of elbow joint, and has good short-term results.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of heterotopic ossification of the elbow joint after trauma. MethodsThe recent domestic and foreign literature concerning heterotopic ossification of the elbow joint after trauma was analysed and summarized. ResultsThe mechanism of heterotopic ossification of the elbow joint after trauma is mainly related to bone morphogenetic protein signal transduction disorder. Now there are many treatments of heterotopic ossification, including non-surgical treatment, prevention, and surgical treatment. Non-surgical treatment and prevention mainly aim at patients who have no elbow heterotopic ossification or who have mild limited elbow motion because of elbow heterotopic ossification after trauma, including drug therapy, radiation therapy, Chinese medicine therapy, and rehabilitation treatment. For patients with invalid non-surgical treatment, choosing surgical treatment is a must. Surgical treatment includes surgical resection, arthroscopic resection, and joint replacement, priority should be given first to surgical resection. ConclusionHeterotopic ossification of the elbow joint is common and there is not a recognized standard treatment, comprehensive use of non-surgical treatment and surgical treatment is the future direction.
Objective To explore the effect of arthroscopy in diagnosis and treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of elbow joint in adolescent. Methods From May 2003 to February 2006, 11 patients with osteochondritis dissecans of elbowjoint were diagnosed and treated with arthroscopy. There were 6 males and 5 females, aging from 13 to 19 years. The left joints were involved in 4 cases and right joints in 7 cases. Seven patients had obvious history of injury. The interval of injury and operation was from 7 months to 12 years. The score of VAS was 80±10, the range of flexion and extend of joint 80±10°, the range of rotation of joint 100±5° preoperatively. The brachial plexus anesthesia, the elbow hung to traction, soft spot, interna and extrapathway were given to explore and debride elbow joint and remove corpus liberum. Results All patients recovered daily life and work 7 to 12 dayspostoperatively. There were no complications of blood vessel and nerve injuries. Eleven cases were followed up for 6 to 18 months (mean 12-5 months). The results wereexcellent in 7 and good in 4 according to HSS scoring system. At the final followup, the score of VAS was 32±15, showing statistically significant difference when compared with preoperation (Plt;0.05). The range of flexion and extend of joint was 110±10°，the range of rotation of joint was 120±5° postoperatively, showing statistically significant differences when compared with preoperation (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The elbow arthroscopy might be a reliable methodto diagnose and treat osteochondritis dissecans of elbow joint in adolescent with minor trauma，quick recovery，significant improving function and less complications.
Objective To investigate the method and effectiveness of operative treatment of Dubberley type 3B capitulum-trochlea fractures. Methods Between January 2009 and December 2012, 8 cases of Dubberley type 3B capitulum-trochlea fractures were treated. There were 2 males and 6 females with an average age of 55 years (range, 43-65 years). The injury was caused by falling in 6 cases, electric bicycle accident in 1 case, and traffic accident in 1 case. All fractures were fresh and closed injury. No neural or vascular injury was found. The time between injury and operation was 3-15 days (mean, 5.9days). Olecranon osteotomy was performed by a posterior midline skin incision of the elbow; 3.0 mm Herbert compression screws placed from posterior to anterior, 2.4 mm L shape locking compression plate designed for distal radius or 2.7 mm anatomical locking compression plate designed for distal humerus and 1.0 mm Kirschner wires or 3.0 mm Herbert screw for the transverse and coronal plane in the subchondral of anterior articular surface were used for fixation; and the lateral and medial collateral ligaments were repaired. Results All incisions healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.5 months). The X-ray films showed that fracture healing was achieved at 12-24 weeks (mean, 15 weeks) in 7 cases. Fracture nonunion and partial bone resorption in the capitellum were observed in 1 case. No failure of internal fixation, ulnohumeral joint instability, or traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the range of motion of injured elbow was 0-40° in extension (mean 25.0°), 100-135° in flexion (mean, 116.3°), 60-70° in pronation (mean, 61.3°), and 80-90° in supination (mean, 81.3°). The elbow function score was 64-96 (mean, 81.1) according to the Broberg-Morrey evaluation criteria; the results were excellent in 2 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 75%. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 0-3 (mean, 1). Conclusion For Dubberley type 3B capitulum-trochlea fractures, an early anatomic reconstruction of capitellar and trochlea, repair of the medial and lateral collateral ligament, and early active mobilization can obtain good functional results.
wenty-one cases with injurys of upper trunk of brachial plexus in 18 and poliomyelitis in 3were treated by transfer of flexor carpi ulnaris muscle to restore flexion of elbow from may, 1981through November, 1992. There were 16 males and 5 females with an average age of 28 years old(ranged 17-60 years). All of the patients was combined with incompetence of abduction function ofshoulder, 6 cases with incompotence of extenxor function of elbow and 11 cases with incompotence ofsupifiation fu...
Objective To summarize the research progress in posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) of the elbow joint. Methods The recent researches about the management of PMRI of the elbow joint from the aspects of pathological anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and therapy were analyzed and summarized. Results The most important factors related to PMRI of the elbow joint are lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) lesion, posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament complex (MCLC) lesion, and anteromedial coronoid fracture. Clinical physical examination include varus and valgus stress test of the elbow joint. X-ray examination, computed tomography, particularly three-dimensional reconstruction, are particularly useful to diagnose the fracture. Also MRI, arthroscopy, and dynamic ultrasound can assistantly evaluate the affiliated injury of the parenchyma. It is important to repair and reconstruct LCLC and MCLC and fix coronoid process fracture for recovering stability of the elbow joint. There are such ways to repair ligament injury as in situ repairation and functional reconstruction, which include direct suturation, borehole repairation, wire anchor repairation, and transplantation repairation etc. The methods for fixation of coronal fracture include screw fixation, plate fixation, unabsorbable suture fixation, and arthroscopy technology. Conclusion It is crucial that recovering the stability of the elbow joint and early functional exercise for the treatment of PMRI. Individual treatment is favorable to protect soft tissue, reduce surgical complications, and improve the functional recovery and the quality of life.
Objective To review the basic research and cl inical progress of elbow heterotopic ossification after injury. Methods The recent l iterature concerning heterotopic ossification of the elbow was reviewed. Results Heterotopic ossification was caused by variety of stimul i and conditions. The current methods of prevention and treatment were to improve surgical techniques, to reduce trauma and bleeding, to rinse the area with bone fragments with plenty of salt water, and to use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Conclusion Once heterotopic ossification occurred, surgical treatment is unique treatment method, so emphasis is to prevent heterotopic ossification.
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the cl inical effect of excising the radial head, repairing or reconstructing themedial collateral l igament (MCL) in treating comminuted fracture of the radial head accompanying by MCL injury. Methods From September 2000 to April 2006, 18 patients with comminuted fractures of radial head accompanying by MCL injury were treated by excision of the radial head, repair or reconstruction of the MCL. Of them, there were 12 males and 6 females,aged 21 to 57 years. Injury was caused by high fall ing in 10 cases and by traffic accidents in 8 cases. According to Mason classifications,13 fractures were of type Ⅲ and 5 of type Ⅳ . Fifteen cases of fresh fractures were operated within 2 weeks, 3 cases of old fractures at 4, 6, and 14 months after injury respectively. Four cases underwent MCL repair and 14 cases underwent MCL reconstruction. Results All the 18 cases were followed up 1-5 years (mean 3 years ). According to Broberg and Morrey scoring system, 4 patients were rated as excellent, 12 as good, 1 as fair, and 1 as poor. The excellent and good rate was 88.9%.Three patients had l ight pain of elbow, 1 patient had moderate pain and the other 14 had no pain. The range of elbow motion was from 110 to 140°(mean 130°). The pronation averaged 75° (35-85°). The supination averaged 80° (65-89°). Compared with normal l imbs, the grip strength decreased by 3% to 28% (mean 15%); the extension strength decreased by 8% to 39% (mean 30%); the flexion strength decreased by 7% to 29% (mean 18%); the pronation strength decreased by 7% to 31% (mean 20%);the supination strength decreased by 15% to 45% (mean 25%). The X-ray films showed that carrying angle increased by 0 to 11°(mean 5° ) under two-newton-meter valgus torque. There were significant differences between injured l imbs and normal l imbs (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The MCL was the primary valgus stabil izer of the elbow. If the radial head replacement could not becarried out, the repair or reconstruction of the medial collateral l igament was effective.
Objective To investigate the method and effectiveness of operative treatment of anterior olecranon fracture-dislocation. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2010, 10 cases of anterior olecranon fracture-dislocation were treated. There were 6 males and 4 females with an average age of 46.1 years (range, 27-68 years). The injury was caused by traffic accident in 7 cases, falling from height in 2 cases, and falling in 1 case. Nine cases were fresh fracture and 1 case was old fracture. There were 9 cases of ulnar olecranon comminuted fracture and 1 case of simple oblique fracture. Associated fractures were Regan-Morrey type III coronoid process fractures in 5 cases, Mason type II radial head fracture in 1 case, and Mason type III radial head fracture in 1 case. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed in all cases: reconstruction plates were used in 4 cases, tension band and reconstruction plates in 5 cases, and tension band and one-third tubular plate in 1 case; bone graft was performed in 2 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-26 months (mean, 19.8 months). The X-ray films showed that fractures healing was achieved at 12-24 weeks (mean, 16.4 weeks). No failure of internal fixation, ulnohumeral joint instability, or traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the elbow function score was 69-100 (mean, 89.1) according to the Broberg-Morrey evaluation criteria; the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 80%. The Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) score was 0-22 (mean, 9). The visual analogue score (VAS) was 0-3 (mean, 0.5). Conclusion For anterior olecranon fracture-dislocation, an early and stable anatomic reconstruction of the trochlear notch of the ulna with plates and early active mobilization are given, the good functional results can be obtained.