Objective To investigate the trend of breast cancer treatment and prognosis in 30 years. Methods Total 1 092 patients with breast cancer treated in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1975 and 2006 were reviewed in six time phases for therapy, metastasis, and survival rate. Six time phases were 1975-1980 years, 1985-1986 years, 1990-1991 years, 1995-1996 years, 2000-2001 years and 2005-2006 years. Results Radical operation was the major treatment (68.9%， 91/132) of breast cancer in 1975-1980 and then became less popular until it was totally abandoned after 2001. The number of modified radical operation begun to rise from 1980 and reached its peak in 1995-1996 (94.9%， 146/154). The number of lumpectomy had been increasing since 2000, and that of chemotherapy had been rising since 1985-1986. But there was no apparent change of the percentage of radiotherapy treatment. In 1975-1980, only 0.8% （1/126） patients received endocrine therapy, but in 1990-1991, the ratio was 66.0% （33/50）. The metastasis and recurrence ratio was declining gradually in the 6 time phases (P＜0.05). The 5-year and 10-year disease free survival rates in the groups of 1990-1991, 1995-1996, 2000-2001, and 2005-2006 were apparently higher than those in two earlier groups of 1975-1980 and 1985-1986 (P＜0.05). Conclusion The conclusions of laboratory experiments and clinical trials on breast cancer are critical for improving prognosis.
Objective To study the risk factors for contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in women after regular treatment of the primary breast cancer. Methods Between January 1997 to December 2002, the clinical data of 340 breast cancer patients at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. In all the patients a detailed analysis was carried out with respect to age, operation type, radiation therapy technique and dose, the use of chemotherapy or hormone therapy, and other clinicopathologic characteristics. The KaplanMeier method was used to estimate the actuarial rate of CBC. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the relative risk factors of CBC. Results Fourteen cases were diagnosed to be CBC, thus overall incidence of CBC was 4.1%. Ten-year CBC incidence (2.7%) was higher than 5-year incidence of CBC (1.4%). Univariate analysis showed that the risk factors of CBC at 5-year and 10-year included: ≤45 years old, medullary carcinoma, family history of breast cancer and being taken without endocrine therapy (P＜0.05), while chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not risk factors of CBC (P＞0.05). Mutivariate analysis showed that ≤ 45 years old and being internal breast radiotherapy were independent risk factors of CBC at 5-year and 10-year (P＜0.05). Conclusions CBC may occur in these primary breast cancer patients with age ≤45 years old, medullary carcinoma, family history of breast cancer. In order to reduce the incidence of CBC, endocrine therapy rather than internal breast radiotherapy should be performed in early breast cancer patients.
ObjectiveTo summarize progression of growth factor receptor (GFR) signaling pathway in endocrineresistant breast cancer. Method Literatures about mechanisms of GFR signaling pathway in the development of endocrineresistant breast cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe crosstalk between GFR and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling pathway had been reported to be involved in the development of endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Interrupting this signaling pathway could overcome endocrine therapy resistance. Many clinical trails had shown that the utilizing endocrine therapy combined with GFR inhibitors could obviously increase the survival rate of patients with breast cancer. ConclusionSeveral agents targeting GFR signaling pathways show a great potential for treatment of patients with breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer.MethodsPubMed, EMBase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer from inception to October 13th, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 2 524 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with placebo combined with endocrine therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy could improve the median progression free survival rate (RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.60, P<0.000 01) and the objective response rate (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.47 to 1.91,P<0.000 01). While there was no statistical difference in clinical benefit rate (RR=0.59, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.19,P=0.64). In terms of adverse reactions, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy had higher rates of neutropenia (RR=49.76, 95%CI 26.85 to 90.21, P<0.000 01), leukopenia (RR=48.69, 95%CI 18.74 to 133.61,P<0.000 01), fatigue (RR=3.11, 95%CI 1.37 to 7.08,P=0.007) and anemia (RR=2.96, 95%CI 1.61 to 5.42, P=0.000 3). There were no significant differences between two groups in nausea, diarrhea and decreased appetite.ConclusionCDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for the patients with advanced breast cancer can improve median progression free survival and objective response rate, while increase the incidence of adverse events such as neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue and anemia. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer. Methods The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data, CNKI, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials on CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer from inception to July 5, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 14.0 software. Results A total of 8 studies involving 4 580 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly longer in the combination therapy group than those in the endocrine therapy alone group (HR=0.80, 95%CI 0.73 to 0.89, P<0.05; HR=0.54, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.59, P<0.05). The results also showed that patients in the combination therapy group also had significantly higher rates of objective remission and clinical benefit than those in the endocrine therapy group alone (RR=1.47, 95%CI 1.34 to 1.62, P<0.05; RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.30, P<0.05). In addition, the combination treatment group also increased the incidence of haematological toxicity such as neutropenia and leucopenia, but the differences in the incidence of nausea, diarrhoea and headache were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer patients improve overall survival, progression-free survival, clinical benefit rate and objective remission rate, with significant long-term and near-term efficacy; however, this regimen increased the incidence of several adverse effects, and clinical use should be considered when considering the occurrence of serious adverse effects.