ObjectiveTo explore the progresses of diagnosis and treatment for endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). MethodsThe literatures on studying the classification, diagnosis and management, risk factor, and treatment for the endoleaks after EVAR were reviewed and analyzed. ResultsEndoleak was a common and particular complication after EVAR and its represented persistence meant failure of the EVAR treatment. Accurate detection and classification were essential for the proper management and the treatment method for the endoleak was determined by the different source. Type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ endoleak required urgent treatment， type Ⅱ and type Ⅴ were considered less urgently but may be observed continuously. A variety of techniques including extension endografts or cuff, balloon angioplasty, bare stents, and a combination of transvascular and direct sac puncture embolization techniques were allowed to treat the vast majority of these endoleaks. ConclusionsEndoleak after EVAR is still the main clinical problem to be solved. The characters of endoleak still are not fully revealed. The diagnosis and treatment remained equivocal, which requires further study.
ObjectiveTo determine the influence of proximal aneurysm neck anatomy on typeⅠA endoleak follo-wing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsFrom September 2007 to February 2014, 111 consecutive patients with non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated with EVAR. The preoperative CTA of abdominal aortic was obtained by every patient, and the three-dimensional imaging was reconstructed and measured by software of Osorix. Then, the relation between the recurrence of typeⅠA endoleak and the concerned data measured by Osorix was analyzed by the statistical software. ResultsThe recurrence of typeⅠA endo-leak was related to the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, which weren't related to the proximal neck diameter and variation rates, the mural thrombas and calcification rate, and the maximum diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm by multivariate analysis. ConclusionsThe complicated proximal aneurysm neck anatomy is a major cause for the typeⅠA endoleak, the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm is the independent factor. The applica-tion of EVAR depends largely on the shape of the proximal aneurysm neck.
Objective To introduce the experience of treating 85 cases of stanford type B aortic dissection by endovascular implantment of stent-grafts，to provide more clinical evidence for endovascular repairment for stanford B type aortic dissections.Methods Imaging examination by computed tomography angiography （CTA） were done to obtain anatomical detail of dissection. Stent-grafts were implanted under the guide of DSA in all cases. The patients were followed-up for 3 months，6 months，12 months，and then annually by CTA examination to observe the complications and morphological changes of the aneurysm.Results The technical success rate was 95.3%（81/85），and the clinical success rate was 91.8%（78/85）. Eight patients died after operation in hospital，who were all in acute phase，and no patients of chronic phase died，there had statistic differences （P＜0.05）. The perioperative complications’ incidence of endovascular repair which happened in patients of acute phase was higher than that patients of chronic phase （38.2% vs.13.3%，P＜0.05）. Left subclavian artery were covered completely for 13 cases，and partially covered for 22 cases，there was no obvious cerebralvascular insufficiency. There were 41 patients of whom other tears which were not covered during operation exsited at abdominal aortic and one year following-up showed that at those section thromblization of false cavity was not clear. The rest of patients whose abdominal aortic didn’t exist tears hadn’t new tears appeared.Conclusions Regardless in the acute or chronic stage，endovascular therapy is an effective mathod of treating stanford type B dissection. However，implanting stent-grafts have a higher security in chronic period than doing that in acute period. If the right carotid artery，vertebra and Willis ring are smoothly，there is little need to set up a by-pass to left subclavian artery before endovascular repairment. For those patients that other uncovered tears exited，following-up should be a must，and further strategy should be studied and prepared in advance.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the initial results of hybrid procedure without sternotomy for aortic arch dissection, and also report our initial experience in performing this procedure. MethodsFrom January 2011 to September 2014, 17 patients diagnosed with aortic arch dissection by CT angiography undergoing the hybrid procedure (thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with supra-arch branch vessel bypass) in the department of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Command. There were 12 males and 5 females aged from 46 to 71 years. Their clinical data, including the imaging findings, treatment, and prognosis were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsLeft common carotid artery (LCCA) to left subclavian artery (LSA) bypass (n=4), right common carotid artery (RCCA) to LCCA to LSA bypass (n=3), RCCA to LCCA bypass merger covered LSA (n=3) were performed. All operations were successful. Laryngeal recurrent nerve injury occurred in one patient. All patients were followed up on the postoperative day 7, 30 and one year. All patients were followed up for 12 to 53 months till September 2015. There was no death, and no complications such as endoleak after the hybrid procedure, stenosis or blockage of the bypass graft during the follow-up period. ConclusionInitial results suggest that the hybrid procedure without sternotomy is a suitable therapeutic option for high risk aortic arch dissection patients in poor general condition with little tolerance to aortic arch replacement．
ObjectiveTo assess the causes and risk factors of multiple-intervention in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 347 TBAD patients initially treated with EVAR in our hospital between January 1999 and December 2013. The patients were stratified into a multiple-intervention group (34 patients) and a single-intervention group (313 patients). We analyzed the differences of clinical data of the two groups. ResultsThere were 9 patients with endoleak, 10 patients with new dissection, 8 patients with incomplete thrombosis of the false lumen, 4 patients with new aneurysm, 2 patients with retrograde dissection, and 1 patient with iliac artery occlusion in the multiple-intervention group. Higher proportions of chronic dissection and smoking occurred in the multiple-intervention group (79.4% versus 50.8%, 61.8% versus 40.3%, P=0.002, 0.018, respectively). Both of the degree and proportion of hyperglycemia were higher in the multiple-intervention group (6.9±2.3 mmol/L versus 5.7±1.8 mmol/L, P=0.027; 44.1% versus 22.7%, P=0.011). There were statistical differences in oversizing rate of grafts (14.6%±3.2% versus 11.3%±2.5%, P<0.001), operation time (172 min versus 82 min, P<0.001), and blood loss (280 ml versus 100 ml, P=0.006) between the two groups. ConclusionEndoleak, new dissection, and incomplete thrombosis of the false lumen are the main causes of multiple-intervention. While in chronic phase, smoking, hyperglycemia, too big oversizing, and complicated lesion or operation are the potential risk factors.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-and long-term results of hybrid procedures in the treatment for aortic arch lesions. MethodsFrom October 2002 to March 2011, 28 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections involving the aortic arch were treated with hybrid endovascular treatment in our center. Twenty-two males and 6 females were in the series. The mean age of the patients was 68 years old. Of 28 patients, 15 were atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms and 13 were thoracic aortic dissection. Follow-up protocol consisted of computed tomography (CT) angiograms or ultrasound was performed in 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. The main goal was to evaluate the operative mortality, morbidity, and the longterm survival of these patients. ResultsHybrid procedures included 12 totalarch transpositions, 3 left common carotid artery (LCCA)left subclavian artery (LSA) bypass, 11 right common carotid artery (RCCA)LCCA-LSA bypass, 2 RCCA-LCCA bypass. The technical success rate was 92.9% (26/28). The complications occurred in 10 patients (35.7%). Operative mortality was 7.1% (2/28). The apoplexia rate was 7.1% (2/28). The time of followup was (36±3) months. The patency rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 100%, 92.9% (26/28), and 85.7% (24/28), respectively. The survival rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 89.3% (25/28), 71.4% (20/28), and 60.7% (17/28), respectively. ConclusionsThe short-and long-term results with hybrid procedures in the treatment for aortic arch diseases are satisfactory. Further reducing the complications is the key to increase the survival rate.
ObjectiveTo review clinical techniques and outcomes of one-stage hybrid surgery for complex Stanford type B aortic dissection (AD), and explore the feasibility of this surgery in basic-level hospitals. MethodsSeven patients with complex Stanford type B AD underwent one-stage hybrid surgery from December 2010 to March 2013 in Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery of Xiangyang Central Hospital. There were 2 males and 5 females with a mean age of 50.0±8.3 years. Preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA)found that the distance between breach and left subclavian artery opening was less than 15 mm in 4 patients, and left subclavian artery root were involved in 3 patients. One patient had several calcification sites of the thoracic aorta and coronary arterial stenosis near the middle segment of anterior descen-ding coronary artery by about 70%. All the patients received general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Firstly, bypass surgery of the branches of the aortic arch was performed via neck incision in the operating room, then endovascular aortic repair (EVAR)using femoral artery incision was performed in the catheter room. The patient with coronary artery disease received concomitant stenting of the anterior descending artery. ResultsAll the patients successfully received the operation and EVAR. Postoperatively, 1 patient had mild type Ⅰ endoleaks. No death or severe complication occurred in this group. Intraoperative angiography showed that blood flow in true lumen of AD became normal, all the bypass grafts were unobs-tructed, the positioning of stent grafts was accurate, and no stent displacement was found. All the 7 patients were followed-up for 3-24 (12.0±3.6)months, and all the patients were alive and resumed normal life during follow-up. In 6 patients, CTA at 3 months, 1 year or 2 years after the operation showed no stent graft translocation, endoleak, bypass or graft obstruction. In 1 patient with typeⅠendoleaks, CTA at 3 months after the operation showed contrast agent in the false lumen, but partial thrombosis occurred, the size and scope of false lumen were smaller than preoperative values, and the true lumen significantly became larger. CTA at 6 months after the operation showed that leakage had disappeared. None of the patients had any sign of brain or limb ischemia. ConclusionOne-stage hybrid surgery is safe and effective for the treatment of complex Stanford type B AD, expands the treatment indications of EVAR, and is worthy of widely application in basic-level hospitals.
Objective To evaluate the importance of "one-stop" hybrid operating room in the individualized treatment of aortic pathology. Method We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 247 patients of aortic pathology who were operated in the hybrid operating room in our hospital from January 2013 through December 2014. There were 193 males and 54 females at age of 24-83(54±12) years. Results Thoracic or abdominal endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/EVAR) was applied in 132 patients, including 122 simple patients and 10 complexes. Fenestrated TEVAR was applied in 61 patients. Hybrid operation was done in 54 patients. Perioperative death occurred in 9 patients (3.6%). Perioperative complication rate was 11.7% (29/247) . The patients were followed up for one year. During follow-up, five patients were dead. The one-year survival rate was 98.0% (242/247) . Conclusions "One-stop" individualized treatment of aortic pathology shows its advantage, yet long-term result still needs to be followed up.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and security of endovascular repair of abdominal aorta using branched stent graft in a novel in vitro vascular model. MethodsThe branched stent graft for the abdominal aorta was designed. The novel in vitro vascular model was established to test this stent graft. Attempts were made to optimize the procedure of stent graft and to evaluate the feasibility of this device. The branched stent graft for abdominal aorta was tested by a novel in vitro vascular model. The number of stent graft released and expanded was recorded respectively. The pressure and situation of branch vessels were assessed before and after stent graft released. The endoleak during releasing process was observed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). ResultsThe stent graft was successfully deployed in the novel in vitro vascular model. The releasing process was all properly achieved (100%, 30/30). The pressure changes of branch vessels were no statistical significances (P > 0.05) between before and after stent graft released. The stent grafts were well landed, and were fully expanded and properly positioned by DSA. No endoleak occurred. ConclusionThe branched stent graft for abdominal aorta in a novel in vitro vascular model is safe and feasible.
ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic strategies of endovascular repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection. MethodThe clinical data of 36 patients with complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection treated by endovascular repair were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThirty-six patients with complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were treated successfully by endovascular repair. Twenty-two cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with covering left subclavian artery (LSA). Ten cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with chimney technique. Two cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with vascular prosthesis bypass from left common carotid artery to LSA. Two cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with vascular prosthesis bypass from right common carotid artery to left common carotid artery, whose proximal part were ligated. The viscera artery and lower extremity artery supply were restored gradually. No complication such as endoleak occurred. ConclusionFor endovascular repair of complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection, strategies combined with covering LSA, chimney technique, and hybrid operation of small incision could extend anchor zone, expand the range of endovascular repair of aortic dissection, improve curative effect, reduce complications.