Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of combined therapy of Gankang Granule and Entecavir for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Methods A total of 118 patients with chronic hepatitis B treated between January 2012 and January 2013 were randomly divided into treatment group (n=59) and control group (n=59). Patients in the treatment group were treated with Gankang Granule and Entecavir, while those in the control group were treated with Entecavir alone. Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference between the two groups in such liver fibrosis evaluation indexes as hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), procollagenⅢ(PCⅢ), and collegen typeⅣ(CⅣ) (P > 0.05). After treatment, the two groups had significant differences in HA, LN, PCⅢ, and CⅣ(P < 0.05). After 48 weeks of treatment, the alanine aminotransferase recovery rate was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05); but there was no significant difference in hepatitis B virus DNA negative conversion rate, hepatitis B e antigen negative conversion rate and hepatitis B e antibody seroconversion rate (P > 0.05). Forty-eight weeks after treatment began, 45 patients underwent liver biopsy which showed that liver fibrosis alleviation was significantly better in the treatment group than the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Gankang granule combined with antiviral drug Entecavir for chronic hepatitis B is better in protecting the liver and alleviating hepatic fibrosis than the sole Entecavir. The combined method is worthy of being promoted.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the combination of entecavir and interferon-α (IFN-α) in treating hepatitis B compared to entecavir alone. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2013), Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on entecavir and interferon-α (IFN-α) in treating hepatitis B from inception to December 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2.5. ResultsA total of 7 RCTs were finally included involving 543 cases. The results of meta-analysis revealed that, compared to entecavir alone, 24-week combined therapy was more effective in improving negative conversion rates of serum HBV-DNA (OR=2.93, 95%CI 1.79 to 4.79, P < 0.000 1), conversion rates of HBeAg (OR=2.36, 95%CI 1.35 to 4.14, P=0.003), and recovery rates of ALT (OR=2.73, 95%CI 1.73 to 4.32, P < 0.000 1). No statistical significance was found in terms of side effects. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that combination of entecavir and IFN-α is more effective than entecavir alone in treating hepatitis B. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the abovementioned conclusion still needs to be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data from their inception to December 2013, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of LAM+ADV versus ETV for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs and 5 cohort studies involving 1 336 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses of RCTs showed that:there were no significant differences between the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.10, P=0.94), HBeAg (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.17, P=0.43), serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.05, P=0.45) and serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.24, P=0.22) at the 48th week. The results of meta-analyses of cohort studies showed that:there were no significant differences between the two groups in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.06, P=0.13) and serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.12, P=0.87), but the ETV group had higher serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.79, P=0.02). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy of LAM+ADV is similar to ETV at the 48th week for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of lamividine (LAM) combined with adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) for lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients. MethodOutpatients and inpatients of lamivudine-resistant kidney graft recipients with chronic hepatitis B admitted to West China Hospital and the People's Hospital of Santai County during Jan 2007 to Mar 2012 were divided into A group (LAM+ADV) and B group (ETV). And the level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), level of serum creatinine, HBV serological markers and HBV-DNA load were compared by SPSS 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 patients were included. The mean age was 36.7±6.6 years old, the majority of patients were male. After treatment for 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 96 weeks, no significant differences were found between two groups in liver function normalization rates, the HBV-DNA negative conversion rates and serum creatinine level. ConclusionsLAM add-on ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy were both safe and effective in LAM-R kidney transplants with CHB, but the load of HBV-DNA in some patients were still positive at the endpoint. Elevated serum creatinine level may occur in some patients who treated with ADV. Consequently, for HBsAg-positive kidney transplantation patients, those anti-HBV drugs that are more effective, safer and less resistant may be better in the beginning of treatment.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α-2a (Peg-IFNα-2a) combined with entecavir (ETV) versus Peg-IFNα-2a alone in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Peg-IFNα-2a combined with ETV for HBeAg-positive CHB from inception to March, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 1 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with Peg-IFNα-2a monotherapy, Peg-IFNα-2a combined with ETV could improve the rate of serum HBV-DNA clearance (RR=2.55, 95%CI 1.83 to 3.55, P<0.000 01), ALT normalization (RR=2.37, 95%CI 1.76 to 3.20, P<0.000 01) and HBeAg seroconversion (RR=2.88, 95%CI 1.18 to 7.03, P=0.02) after 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, it could improve the rate of serum HBV-DNA clearance (RR=2.10, 95%CI 1.74 to 2.53, P<0.000 01), AST normalization (RR=1.87, 95%CI 1.15 to 3.04, P=0.01), ALT normalization (RR=1.70, 95%CI 1.46 to 1.99, P<0.000 01), serum HBeAg clearance (RR=2.14, 95%CI 1.62 to 2.83, P<0.000 01), HBeAg seroconversion (RR=2.51, 95%CI 1.65 to 3.82, P<0.000 01) and serum HBsAg clearance (RR=2.78, 95%CI 1.06 to 7.31, P=0.04) after 24 weeks of treatment. It could also improve the rate of serum HBV-DNA clearance (RR=1.63, 95%CI 1.32 to 2.02, P<0.000 01), AST normalization (RR=2.75, 95%CI 1.82 to 4.16, P<0.000 01), ALT normalization (RR=1.47, 95%CI 1.33 to 1.63, P<0.000 01), serum HBeAg clearance (RR=1.65, 95%CI 1.42 to 1.91, P<0.000 01), HBeAg seroconversion (RR=1.91, 95%CI 1.51 to 2.41, P<0.000 01) and serum HBsAg clearance (RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.07 to 2.31, P=0.02) after 48 weeks of treatment. There was no statistically significance of adverse reactions in groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that Peg-IFNα-2a combined with ETV is superior to Peg-IFNα-2a monotherapy in the treatment of HBeAg-positive CHB, and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.