Methods Sixty-six postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes were divided into 3 groups according to the balanced principle. In the frist group (FD group), FD was the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the second group (fresubin group), fresubin and the ordinary insulin injection were the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the third group (TPN group), the nutrition preparation came from TPN and the ordinary insulin injection for 24 patients. FD, fresubin or TPN were given at 24 h after operation, the levels of blood glucose for empty stomach, after meal (enteral nutrition or TPN) and the common complications compared among 3 groups of postoperative patients. Results ① In FD group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition were stable with little fluctuation and no insulin was needed with 1 case of hyperglycemia (4.8%). In fresubin group and TPN group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition or TPN were unstable with big fluctuation, with 6 cases (28.6%) and 8 cases (33.3%) of hyperglycemia, 5 cases (23.8%) and 6 cases (25.0%) of hypoglycemia in fresubin group and TPN group, respectively. Compared with fresubin group and TPN group, the rate of pathoglycemia was lower in FD group, the difference had statistical significance separately (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between fresubin group and TPN group (Pgt;0.05). ② The rates of infection of incisional wound in FD group (4.8%) and fresubin group (23.8%) were lower than that of TPN group (33.3%), there was significant difference among 3 groups (Plt;0.05); The time of passage of gas by anus in FD group and fresubin group were shorter than that in TPN group (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between FD group and fresubin group (Pgt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the rates of abdominal distension or diarrhea among 3 groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Regarding postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes, in the early time field test group of the nutrition preparation, FD is better than fresubin or TPN, which does not increase the risk of the blood glucose change and have few complications.
Objective To study effects of enteral immunonutrition and econutrition on intestinal mucosa barrier function in wounded rats. Methods Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups, with ten rats in each group 〔ie.control group, enteral nutrition (EN) group, enteral immunonutrition (EIN) group and enteral econutrition (EEN) group〕. After gastrostomy, rats in each group were treated with the isocaloric and isonitrogenous nutritional formulas for 7 days, respectively. The morphology of ileum membrane was studied, and the quantities of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells (each HP) of ileum membrane were determined. Results The villus height, crypt depth, mucosal thickness (except EN group) and villus surface area of ileum were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference among the former three groups (Pgt;0.05). The numbers of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), and those numbers in EN group were lower than those in EIN and EEN group (P＜0.05). Conclusion EIN and EEN may improve intestine mechanical barrier function and promote restoration of small intestine mucous membrane barrier function in rats. EIN and EEN also improve intestine immune barrier function and strengthen its immune function.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo generally analyze the current situations of clinical research and applications in early enteral nutrition (EEN) after abdominal surgery. MethodsThe published papers about the current situations of clinical research and applications in EEN after abdominal surgery were reviewed. ResultsEEN after abdominal surgery seems to be safe and effective, produces a positive nitrogen balance, keeps the integrality of structure and function of the apparatus, protects gut barrier, and reduces or prevents septic complications. ConclusionEEN may be of more benefits and will be one of the best methods of nutrition support after abdominal surgery.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the predictors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were searched to collect relevant observational studies from the inception to 6 August, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 18 studies were included, including 28 847 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that gender, age, severity of illness, hypo-albuminemia, length of stay, postpyloric feeding, mechanical ventilation and mechanical ventilation time, use of prokinetics, use of sedation drugs, use of vasoactive drugs and use of antibiotics were predictors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients, among which postpyloric feeding (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.71, P<0.01) was a protective factor. ConclusionAccording to the influencing factors, the medical staff can formulate a targeted enteral nutrition program at the time of admission to the ICU to reduce the occurrence of feeding intolerance. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperation administration of enteral nutrition enriched ω-3 fatty acids for gastric cancer patients. MethodsA single center randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in 60 cases of gastric cancer in West China Hospital during January 2014 to June 2014, and cases were equally randomized divided into treatment group and control group. Cases of treatment group were given enteral nutrition enriched ω-3 fatty acids which was manufactured by Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH for 5 consecutive days before operation, and cases of control group were given an isocaloric and isonitrogenous homogenized diet for 5 consecutive days before operation. The laboratory indexes of nutritional status and imflammatory factors were observed and compared between 2 groups on admission, preoperative day 1, postoperative day 3, and postoperative day 5. Liver and kidney function indexes which as the safety indexes were detected on admission and preoperative day 1. Vomiting, diarrhea, and infectious complications were recorded in addition. ResultsOn 3 days after operation, levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and α-acid glycoprotein (AAG) of treatment group were both lower than those of control group (P<0.05); on 5 days after operation, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) of treatment group was lower than that of control group too (P<0.05); but at other time points, there were no significant differences in any index between the 2 groups (P>0.05). During the period of enteral nutrition, only 1 case suffered from bloating and 1 case suffered from diarrhea, both in treatment group, and the incidence of adverse reactions didn't differed between treatment group[6.7% (2/30)]and control group[0 (0/30)], P>0.05. Moreover, there were no significant differences between treatment group and control group in incidences of wound infection[3.3% (1/30) vs. 10.0% (3/30)], abdominal infection[0 (0/30) vs. 3.3% (1/30)], urinary infection[0 (0/30) vs. 3.3% (1/30)], and pulmonary infection[0 (0/30) vs. 6.7% (2/30)], but the total incidence of complication was lower in treatment group than that of control group[3.3% (1/30) vs. 23.3% (7/30)], P=0.026. ConclusionEnteral nutrition enriched ω-3 fatty acids can reduce the rate of infection-related complication for patients with gastric cancer, and has a sense of safety.
Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect of early enteral nutrition （EN） in gastric cancer patients after operation and its safety. Methods One hundred and eighty patients with gastric cancer diagnosed and underwent surgical treatment in gastrointestinal surgery center， West China Hospital from February 2011 to December 2011 were studied prospectively， who were randomly divided into EN group （n=91） and parenteral nutrition （PN） group （n=89）. The nutrition state， rehabilitation， hospital stay， cost of nutrition in hospital， and complications were observed. Results ①According to the postoperative serum nutrition index， there were no significant differences in the prealbumin， hemoglobin， and ratio of albumin to globulin in two groups （P＞0.05）， but the albumin level in the EN group was significantlyhigher than that in the PN group （P=0.047）. ②According to the postoperative rehabilitation index， the first ambulation time （P=0.011）， first intake time （P=0.000）， first nasogastric tube away time （P=0.013）， first drainage tube away time （P=0.021）， and first urinary catheter away time （P=0.002） in the EN group were significantly shorter than those in the PN group. The difference of the first anus exhaust time was not statistically significant in two groups （P=0.083）. ③The cost of nutrition in hospital in the EN group was significantly less than that in the PN group （P=0.017）. The postoperative hospital stay and total complication rate were not significant differences in two groups （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Early postoperative EN is effective， economic， practical， which might be superior to PN.
Objective To investigate the effect of mesenteric lymphatic duct liagtion and glutamine enteral nutrition on intestine and distant organs in intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Methods Forty male SD rats undergoing gastrostomy were randomly assigned into 5 groups (n=8): sham operation group, normal enteral nutrition group, normal enteral nutrition+lymphatic duct ligation group, glutamine group and glutamine+lymphatic duct ligation group. Sham operation group only received laparotomy after 7 days of full diet, the other four groups were subjected to 60 min of intestinal ischemia after 7 days of enteral nutrition, and the two lymphatic duct ligation groups were plus mesenteric lymphatic duct ligation. The original nutrition continued 3 days after reperfusion. Intestinal permeability was detected on day 1 before reperfusion, day 1 and 3 after reperfusion. Intestinal morphology was observed, endotoxin, D-lactate and diamine oxidase levels in serum, and apoptotic index in lung tissue were detected on day 3 after reperfusion. Results The intestinal permeability in each group was significantly increased on day 1 after reperfusion (Plt;0.05), and which in normal enteral nutrition+lymphatic duct ligation group and glutamine+lymphatic duct ligation group were significantly decreased on day 3 after reperfusion (Plt;0.05). The mucosal thickness and villus height of ileum and mucosal thickness of jejunium in glutamine+lymphatic duct ligation group were significantly higher than those in other groups (Plt;0.05), and villus height of ileum in glutamine group was higher than that in normal enteral nutrition group (Plt;0.05); those morphology indexes in normal enteral nutrition+lymphatic duct ligation group were higher than those in normal enteral nutrition group, but there was no statistical signification (Pgt;0.05). Apoptosis index of lung tissue in lymphatic duct ligation groups was significant lower than that in no-ligation groups (Plt;0.05). Levels of endotoxin, D-lactate, and diamine oxidase in lymphatic duct ligation groups had downward trends compared with no-ligation groups, but there was no statistical signification (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury of rats can cause intestinal permeability increase, bacterial endotoxin translocation and systemic inflammatory response. Mesenteric lymphatic duct ligation and glutamine enteral nutrition intervention can weak lung tissue damage, increase thickness of intestinal mucosa, maintain intestinal barrier function, reduce endotoxin translocation and attenuate systemic inflammatory response. Enteral nutrition with glutamine was better than normal enteral nutrition.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of total enteral nutrition (TEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods The databases such as Pubmed (1996 to June 2011), EMbase (1984 to June 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) and CBM (1978 to June 2011) were electronically searched, and the relevant references of the included papers were also manually searched. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.1 software. Results Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 379 patients with SAP were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with TPN, TEN could significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 1), pancreatitis-related infections (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.50, Plt;0.000 01), required rate of surgical intervention (RR=0.43, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.82, P=0.01), and incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.46, Plt;0.000 01). There was no significant difference in the nutrition strategies associated complications between TPN and TEN (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.42 to 3.22, P=0.78). Conclusion Meta-analyses show that compared with TPN, TEN can reduce the risk of mortality, pancreatitis-related infections, required rate of surgical intervention, and incidence of MOF; and it will not increase the nutrition strategies associated complications. Consequently, TEN should be considered a better choice for SAP patients as early as possible.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of enteral feeding pump and intermittent bolus nasogastric feeding on gastric retention, diarrhea, regurgitation, and other complications of patients who received enteral nutrition treatment. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed (1980-2013.9), Wiley Online Library (1990-2013.9), Elsevier (1990-2013.9), CNKI (1990-2013.9), VIP (1989-2013.9) and WanFang Data (1990-2013.9), to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about enteral feeding pump and intermittent bolus nasogastric feeding. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2.6 software. ResultsA total of 16 trials involving 1 263 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that enteral feeding pump was better than intermittent bolus nasogastric feeding in the incidences of gastric retention (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.45, P < 0.000 01), diarrhea (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.34, P < 0.000 01), regurgitation (OR=0.26, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.65, P=0.004), aspiration (OR=0.19, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.32, P < 0.000 01), aspiration pneumonia (OR=0.40, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.68, P=0.000 7), and abdominal distension (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.57, P=0.001), with significant differences. However, they were alike in the incidence of tub obstruction (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.14 to 1.29, P=0.13). ConclusionAccording to existing relevant RCTs, enteral feeding pump is better than intermittent bolus nasogastric feeding in reducing enteral nutrition complications to some extent. However, due to the low methodological quality of the included studies, more large-scale, multicentre high quality RCTs are still needed to verify the aforementioned conclusion.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of enteral nutrition via stoma of jejunum or nasal-jejunum tube after Whipple procedure. MethodsEighty-seven patients performed Whipple procedure were divided into nasaljejunum tube group(n=47)and stoma of jejunum group(n=40)according to the different enteral nutrition methods. The adverse reactions such as vomiting, abdominal distension, pharyngeal pain, and hypostatic pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and serum glucose and electrolyte(CL-, Na+, K+)on day 1, 3, 5 after operation were compared between two groups. ResultsCompared with the nasal-jejunum tube group, the rates of adverse reactions and hypostatic pneumonia were more lower(P < 0.05), the hospitalization expense was more less (P < 0.05) in the nasal-jejunum tube group. The rate of anastomotic leakage and hospital stay had no significant differences between the nasal-jejunum tube group and stoma of jejunum group(P > 0.05). The differences of serum glucose and electrolyte(CL-, Na+, K+)on day 1, 3, 5 after operation were not statistically significant between two groups(P > 0.05). ConclusionsEnteral nutrition via the stoma of jejunum after Whipple procedure has some better clinical effects in reducing adverse reactions such as vomiting, abdominal distension, pharyngeal pain, hypostatic pneumonia. The hospitalization expenses are decreased. There are no obvious effects on the hospital stay, blood glucose and electrolyte concentration on day 1, 3, 5 after operation.