ObjectiveTo compare the keyhole approach and traditional craniotomy in the treatment of basal ganglia region hypertension cerebral hemorrhage postoperative epileptic curative effect comparison keyhole approach and traditional craniotomy in the treatment of basal ganglia region the curative effect of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage postoperative epilepsy. MethodsCollected cases of basal ganglia region admitted in department of neurosurgery our hospital from September 2006 to March 2015, 108 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients, randomly divided into two groups:keyhole approach group (58 cases) and conventional surgery group (50 cases).Two groups of patients with perioperative all use the same management scheme, using statistical methods to analyze clinical data of two groups of patients, such as age, sex, blood loss, postoperative epilepsy, drug efficacy and the incidence of adverse drug reactions, etc. ResultsPostoperative follow-up of 2 years, keyhole approach group 12 cases sufferred postoperative seizure, 1 case of patients with status epilepticus, no death occurred; a total of 10 cases of mono-antiepileptic drug(AEDs) therapy effectively, and 7 cases present adverse drug reactions; Traditional surgical postoperative seizures 22 cases, 9 cases occurred status epilepticus, and five died as a result, only five were effective for single therapy, and 15 cases with adverse drug reactions.Statistical results suggest the incidence of postoperative epilepsy, the incidence of severe epilepsy, prognosis, single drug control and adverse drug reactions between the tuo groups have significant difference (P < 0.05). ConclusionCompared with traditional craniotomy for removal of hematoma, keyhole approach greatly reduce the incidnce of basal ganglia region hypertension cerebral hemorrhage postoperative complications, severe epilepsy and adverse reaction of AEDs.Therefore, keyhole approach in the treatment of basal ganglia region hypertension cerebral hemorrhage is an admirable way of treatment.