Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has some unique advantages in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Due to different ideas and mechanism of between TCM and biomedicine in the prevention and treatment of cancer, the clinial effect evaluation approches of biomedicine could not be used as a beneficial method to scientifically evaluate the effects of TCM. From three angles, this article analyzes the key issues regardsing the evaluation methods of TCM as an adjuvant therapy of cancer. It draws lessons from the idea of quality-adjusted survival (QAS), proposes Two-in-One (TIO) method to evaluate the effects of TCM as adjuvant therapy of cancer, which reflects the combined value of the individual patient dynamic information and provides methodological support for the effect evaluation of TCM.
With the flourishing career of scientific research, the number of medical literature is in the explosion of growth. According to the statistics revealed by the Royal Society in March 2011, it showed that the proportion of published literature in China increased from 4.4% at the beginning of this century to 12.2%, and leaped into the second rank of the world. But the citations lagged behind the growth in number. In addition, the quality of medical literature relates to the reliability of results. Therefore, how to evaluate and improve the quality of medical literature is important. This paper will present some evaluation methods of credible medical literatures.
Objective To identify the clinical evaluation methods used for undergraduate nursing students. Methods A self-made questionnaire about the clinical evaluation methods for undergraduate nursing students was used to collect information from 158 tutors of undergraduate nursing students in 4 teaching hospitals in Sichuan province. Results In terms of consulting evaluation opinion from other nurses, there was no significant difference between the ratios of tutors who really adopted and those who perceived as necessary to do so (Pgt;0.05). As for consulting the self-evaluation of nursing students and patients’ evaluation opinion, the ratio of tutors who really adopted was lower than those who perceived as necessary to do so (Plt;0.01). The majority of tutors used real, ward patients for evaluation, while a minority of tutors used demonstration room and model patients. The most effective methods viewed by the tutors were observation, holistic nursing care examination and test, and the most often used evaluation methods were clinical skill test, observation and theoretical exam. Most tutors adopted a continuous evaluation method for the clinical evaluation of undergraduate nursing students. Conclusion The methods for the clinical evaluation of undergraduate nursing students varies. This may influence the accuracy, objectivity and fairness of the evaluations. Formulating evaluation sheet of patients and self-evaluation sheet of nursing students, establishing standardized clinical skill examination station, training standardized patients and evaluation skills of clinical tutors, standardizing examination content and relevant evaluation standard and methods, and adopting comprehensive evaluation with various methods may help to improve the accuracy, objectivity and fairness of the clinical evaluation of undergraduate nursing students.
Esophageal carcinoma surgery belongs to high risk subjects. Esophageal carcinoma radical resection and reconstruction is popular in the surgical field and one of the most challenging operations. How to understand, evaluate and treat risks, take corresponding measures, so as to reduce and avoid risks, has been the focus of clinical attention and research. we base on clinical work practices, review the relevant literatures, try to review the risk factors of Esophageal cancer surgery, evaluation methods, risk classification, and its preventive countermeasures for preliminary thinking and discussions, to provide a useful reference to development of a scientific, rational and practical Esophageal cancer surgery risk scoring system.
ObjectivesTo provide a reference for the evaluation procedures of genetic testing technology applicable to China by combining the existing evaluation frameworks and procedures for genetic testing techniques globally, and also put forward design suggestions for the construction of evaluation procedures in China.MethodsThe literature research method was primarily used to summarize different evaluation progress, as well as put forward design suggestions.ResultsAt present, numerous developed countries have organized genetic testing technology evaluation projects. The various evaluation frameworks developed were based on the ACCE or HTA framework. The evaluation and decision-making procedures were similar in general, including topic selection, evaluation implementation, results reporting and making recommendations. However, there still remained difficulties such as limited evidence and uncertainty in decision-making.ConclusionsTo establish the procedures of genetic testing technology applicable in China, the following specific procedures are recommended: selecting target genetic testing technology topics; analyzing necessity and feasibility of target testing technology evaluation; evaluating and reviewing the evidence; applying results and decision-making transformation; developing regular review and revision mechanisms.
The prevention and control of chronic diseases is a major need that urgently needs to be solved in China. Traditional Chinese medicine has unique advantages in preventing and treating chronic diseases. However, insufficient patient engagement may be found in the selection and evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine for the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. In recent years, patient-centered clinical research has become a hot topic. A patient-centered methodological framework is proposed for the selection and evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine for preventing and treating chronic diseases. It incorporates some patient-centered studies based on the evidence-based medicine practice model, and will provide a scientific basis for screening traditional Chinese medicine for preventing and treating chronic diseases, improving the efficiency of traditional Chinese medicine services, improving price policies, and updating medical insurance catalogs.
The method of evaluating clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine is one of the hotspots in the field of traditional Chinese medicine in recent years. How to dynamically evaluate individual efficacy is one of the key scientific problems to explain the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine. At present, there are no recognized methods of evaluating individual efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine. In this study, we provided a method of dynamically evaluating individual efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine based on Bayesian N-of-1 trials after analyzing the current status of researches on methods of evaluating individual efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine. This method has the advantages of both N-of-1 trials and Bayesian multilevel models. It is feasible to evaluate individual efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine from the perspective of the design and analysis method. This study can provide an important basis for enriching and improving the methodology of evaluating individual efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine.