ObjectiveTo analyze the research status of mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) in medical and nursing education in the mainland of China, so as to provide a basis for optimizing medical and nursing teaching evaluation tools and promoting the reform of medical and nursing personnel training mode.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Wanfang, CQVIP, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and China Biomedical Literature Database were searched. The key words were “mini-clinical evaluation exercise” or “mini-CEX” or “CEX” or “mini clinical exercise evaluation”. The languages were limited to Chinese and English. The address of the first author was in the mainland of China. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the databases to December 31st, 2020. The literature was analyzed bibliometrically after screening and duplicate removal.ResultsA total of 536 articles were included for analysis and summary. The articles originated from 28 provincial-level administrative divisions in China, among which Shanghai, Xinjiang, Guangxi, Liaoning, and Guangdong were the top five in terms of the number of papers published. The annual number of papers published exceeded 60 in 2017, and reached 112 in 2019 and 113 in 2020, respectively. A total of 397 hospitals and universities contributed to the literature, among which 49 institutions published more than 2 papers. The maximum number of articles published by a same author was 5. There were 530 journal papers published in 169 journals. Only 228 articles (42.54%) were supported by funds, and the research type was mainly experimental and quasi experimental research (56.71%). Under the key words co-occurrence network analysis, a total of 321 nodes and 1 013 connections were obtained, with an average of 3.21 connections per node. In addition to “mini-CEX” and “mini-clinical exercise evaluation”, the most prominent research directions were “clinical teaching” “standardized training” “resident” “scenario simulation” and “clinical ability”.ConclusionsThe number of mini-CEX-related medical and nursing articles is increasing year by year, but the distribution of research areas and institutions is uneven, the research quality needs to be improved, the application scope and research types need to be enriched, and the research content needs to be expanded. In the future, teachers and research teams of medical colleges and universities should be mobilized to apply Mini-CEX teaching method to the cultivation of medical and nursing talents in a whole and continuous way, so as to further standardize the localization application of mini-CEX in the mainland of China, and promote the in-depth development of formative evaluation of medical education.
ObjectiveTo summarize the changes of gut microbiota after cholecystectomy, the mechanisms of changes, and the relation with colorectal cancer, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and post-cholecystectomy syndrome after cholecystectomy, in order to provide new ideas for the perioperative management of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. MethodThe studies related to gut microbiota after cholecystectomy at home and abroad were searched and analyzed for review. ResultsThe cholecystectomy disrupted the liver–bile acid–gut flora axis of the patients, and the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota of the patients were altered, and the alteration might lead to the occurrence of colorectal cancer, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and post-cholecystectomy syndrome, but the exact mechanism remained unclear. ConclusionsThe balance of intestinal microecology is disrupted after cholecystectomy, and the relation between cholecystectomy and gut microbiota may provide new ideas for the perioperative management of cholecystectomy patients and the prevention and treatment of diseases or symptoms after cholecystectomy, but the effect of cholecystectomy on gut microbiota and the relation with diseases or symptoms still need to be further studied.
Objective To analyze the progress of evaluation indexes for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) model at home and abroad, and to propose suggestions for constructing systematic evaluation model of ERAS. Methods Atfirst checked the Chinese and English databases, including Medline, Embase, Sciencedirect, ACP Journal Club, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases (retrieval time was from January 1997 to December 2017), and then filtered the literatures, excluded duplicate documents, a total of 1 020 English literatures and 786 Chinese literatures were enrolled eventually to make an review. Results The literatures showed that, at present, there was no comprehensive and systematic evaluation index system about ERAS at home and abroad. The existing evaluation indexes mainly included the following deficiencies: localization and fragmentation of evaluation indicators, lack of evaluation indicators of ERAS organizational framework and process management, as well as lack of standardized operational definition of evaluation indicators. Conclusions The evaluation indexes of ERAS at home and abroad do not constitute a systematic evaluation index system according to scientific principles, which will restrict the standardization of accelerated surgical rehabilitation in our country. To establish a multidimensional and comprehensive quality evaluation index system based on multi-evaluation of hospital, patient, social, and medical management institutions, which covers ERAS organizational structure, process management, and clinical outcomes, is a necessary condition for the development of ERAS model.