Core Outcome Set (COS) is an important approach to address problems in which the outcomes are inconsistent, non-essential and reporting biased in clinical researches. In order to ensure the standardization of the COS development process, the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) has initiatively developed the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD). The recommendation includes 11 minimum standards, involving 3 common key domains: the scope, the stakeholders, and the consensus process. The COS-STAD is used by COS developers for standardizing research design, determining the quality of the methodology to develop a COS. Based on the background and conditions of clinical practice and clinical trials in China, especially the characteristics of the development of Core Outcome Set of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM-COS), this paper interprets the recommendations of COS-STAD, providing a reference for the potential users of COS in China.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection. MethodsThe patients with chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection who underwent total endovascular treatment at Shanghai City First People’s Hospital between December 2021 and March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into single-trunk group and double-trunk group according to the treatment methods. Clinical data including demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, surgical details, postoperative complications and long-term follow-up data were collected. Outcome measures mainly included surgical success rate, in-hospital mortality, endoleak rate and incidence of branch restenosis. ResultsThirty-four patients with thoracoabdominal aortic dissection were treat with total endovascular treatment. That success rate of operation was 100%. The in-hospital mortality was 2.94%. the incidence of paraplegia was 0.00%. the incidence of cerebral infarction was 2.94%. The incidence of type Ⅲ endoleak was 5.88%. The incidence of branch artery stenosis was 8.82%. The incidence of dissection progression was 8.82%. The reintervention rate was 14.71%. In the aspect of reconstruction of splanchnic artery branches, fenestration stent was the main method in the single-trunk group, and branch stent was the main method in the double-trunk group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative and mid-term follow-up results between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionTotal endovascular treatment is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with thoracoabdominal aortic dissection.