ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulate compression screw (CCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. MethodsThe clinical data of 82 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fracture treated between January 2018 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into FNS group (24 cases) and CCS group (58 cases) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in general data such as gender, age, height, body mass, cause of injury, complications, fracture location, and fracture classification (Garden classification and Pauwells classification). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications (nonunion, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, shortening of femoral neck, etc.), visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 2 days after operation, clinical healing time of fracture, and Harris score of hip joint after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe operation time and VAS score at 2 days after operation in FNS group were significantly lower than those in CCS group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (t=0.263, P=0.796). The patients in CCS group were followed up 6-18 months, with an average of 13.6 months; and the follow-up time in FNS group was 3-12 months, with an average of 7.3 months. There was no complication of internal fixator loosening in both groups. There were 2 cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, 1 case of bone nonunion, and 13 cases of femoral neck shortening in CCS group and only 2 cases of femoral neck shortening in FNS group. The difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (27.6% vs. 8.3%) was significant (χ2=36.670, P=0.015). In CCS group, 3 cases underwent secondary artificial hip arthroplasty due to bone nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and the remaining 55 cases achieved clinical healing; in FNS group, 6 patients excluded in the statistics because the follow-up time was less than 6 months, and the remaining 18 fractures healed clinically; there was significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=4.481, P=0.000). The difference of Harris score of hip joint between 9 months and 6 months after operation in FNS group was significantly higher than that in CCS group (P<0.05), and the Harris score at 9 months after operation was significantly higher than that at 6 months after operation in both groups (P<0.05). ConclusionFNS can accelerate the healing of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients, so that patients can start functional exercise as soon as possible, thereby reducing the incidence of related complications.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of femoral neck system (FNS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients. Methods The literature on FNS at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the results of mechanical and clinical studies on FNS were summarized based on clinical experience. Results FNS has good mechanical stability, which can reduce complications such as femoral neck shortening, internal fixation failure, and varus caused by mechanical instability. At present, FNS is mainly selected for comparison with cannulated compression screws and dynamic hip screws in clinical research. The results show that FNS has the advantages of minimally invasive, short operation time, less intraoperative fluoroscopy, earlier postoperative weight-bearing and fracture healing, and better hip function recovery. Conclusion As a new internal fixator, FNS has achieved satisfactory results in the current research. FNS has good mechanical advantages, which is beneficial to fracture healing and the recovery of hip joint function after operation. However, whether FNS can reduce the incidence of nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head remains to be further clarified.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after treatment of femoral neck fractures with femoral neck system (FNS). MethodsBetween January 2020 and February 2021, 179 patients (182 hips) with femoral neck fractures treated by FNS fixation were selected for retrospective analysis. There were 96 males and 83 females with an average age of 53.7 years (range, 20-59 years). There were 106 cases of low-energy-induced injury and 73 cases of high-energy-induced injury. The fractures were classified as type Ⅱ in 40 hips, type Ⅲ in 78 hips, and type Ⅳ in 64 hips according to Garden classification standard, and as typeⅠin 23 hips, type Ⅱ in 66 hips, and type Ⅲ in 93 hips according to Pauwels classification standard. There were 21 patients with diabetes. Patients were divided into ONFH group and non-ONFH group according to whether ONFH occurred at last follow-up. The data of the patients were collected, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), trauma mechanism, bone mineral density, having diabetes or not, Garden classification and Pauwels classification of fractures, fracture reduction quality, femoral head retroversion angle, and removal of internal fixator or not. The above factors were analyzed by univariate analysis, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors. Results Total 179 patients (182 hips) were followed up 20-34 months (mean, 26.5 months). Of these, 30 cases (30 hips) developed ONFH at 9-30 months after operation (ONFH group), and the incidence of ONFH was 16.48%. And 149 cases (152 hips) had no ONFH at last follow-up (non-ONFH group). The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between groups in bone mineral density, having diabetes or not, Garden classification, femoral head retroversion angle, and fracture reduction quality (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the Garden type Ⅳ fracture, reduction quality of grading Ⅲ, femoral head retroversion angle >15°, complicated with diabetes were the risk factors for ONFH after FNS fixation (P<0.05). ConclusionFor the patients with Garden type Ⅳ fracture, poor quality of fracture reduction, femoral head retroversion angle >15°, and diabetes, the risk of ONFH after FNS fixation increases.