Objective To investigate the effects of 3 methods (suture removal, suture removal with epineurium neurolysis, and l igated femoral nerve resection with end-end suture) in repairing femoral nerve injury after l igation in different periods so as to provide a reference for cl inical use of repairing iatrogenic l igation injury of the peri pheral nerve. Methods A total of 120 adult female Sprague Dawley rats, weighing (200 ± 20) g, were used to prepare the animal models of left femoralnerve l igation, and were divided into groups A (n=40), B (n=40), and C (n=40) according different repairing methods. Atimmediate, 1, 3, and 5 months (10 rats each time point) after l igation, suture removal was performed in group A, suture removal with epineurium neurolysis in group B, and l igated femoral nerve resection with end-end suture in group C. At 3 months after operation, the foot-base angle (FBA) and the heels-tail angle (HTA), action potential and conduction velocity of femoral nerve, and wet weight of quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM) were measured; the samples of quadriceps femoris and femoral nerve were harvested for histological observation, muscle fiber count, and nerve fiber passing rate measuring. Results The FBA in group A was significant smaller than that in group C at immediate, 1, 3, and 5 months (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups A and B (P gt; 0.05). The HTA in group A was significantly smaller than that in group C at immediate, 1, 3, and 5 months (P lt; 0.05), and the THA in group B was significantly smaller than that in group C at 1, 3, and 5 months (P lt; 0.05). The wet weight of QFM in group B was significantly higher than that in group C at immediate, 3, and 5 months (P lt; 0.05), and the wet weight of QFM in group A was significantly higher than that in group C at immediate and 3 months (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and B at immediate, 1, and 3 months (P gt; 0.05). There was significant difference in the action potential of femoral nerve between group A and groups B and C at immediate and 1 month (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between other groups at 3 and 5 months (P gt; 0.05) except between groups A and C at 5 months (P lt; 0.05). The conduction velocity of femoral nerve in group A was significantly faster than that in group C at immediate, 1, and 5 months (P lt; 0.05), and it was significantly faster in group A than in group B at immediate and 1 month (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and B at 3 and 5 months (P gt; 0.05), between groups B and C at other time points (P gt; 0.05) except at immediate (P lt; 0.05). The count of muscle fibre of the quadriceps femoris was significantly more in groups A and B than in group C at immediate (P lt; 0.05); it was significantly more in group A than in group B at 5 months (P lt; 0.05). The passing rate of the femoral nerve fiber was significantly higher in group A than in groups B and C at 3 months (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between the other groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion After femoral nerve l igation, suture removal method has the best effect at early term, the next is epineurium neurolysis method, and the worst is the l igation femoral nerve resection with end-end suture repair.
ObjectiveTo compare postoperative analgesic efficacy and motor function recovery between ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) and Femoral nerve block (FNB) in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsFrom March to April 2014, 40 patients chosen to receive TKA under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to FNB group and ACB group with 20 in each group. Opioids consumption during and after operation, pain score in rest and movement, the force of quadriceps femoris, activity of knee and complications after surgery were recorded. ResultsNo differences were found in opioids consumption during and after operation, pain score in rest and movement after operation. Patients of ACB group were superior to those of FNB group in motor function recovery. At hour 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 after operation, the force of quadriceps femoris was higher in patients of ACB group than those of FNB group (P<0.05). Activity of knee was higher in patients of ACB group than those of FNB group postoperatively. ConclusionACB and FNB have equal postoperative analgesic effect for TKA patients. But ACB has less influence on the force of quadriceps femoris than FNB. Therefore, patients of ACB group are superior to those of FNB group in motor function recovery, showing better activity of knee and early time of first straight leg raising.
ObjectiveTo study the analgesia and rehabilitation effect of femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). MethodsDuring June to September 2014, 62 patients who were scheduled to undergo ACLR were randomly divided into two groups:femoral nerve block group (n=31) and control group (n=31). All the patients were given celecoxib 200 mg (twice per day) three days before surgery. Patients in the femoral nerve block group were given a single-injection femoral nerve block (SFNB) half an hour before surgery (ropivacaine 0.75%, 30 mL), Both of the two groups underwent ice therapy after surgery. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, knee joint range of motion, the muscle strength of quadriceps femoris, the side effects, complications and infection rate were recorded after the operation. ResultsThe VAS scores were significantly lower in the femoral nerve block group within 2 hours to 7 days after surgery (P<0.05), and the use of morphine was less than the control group in all the time points with statistical significance (P<0.05). The muscle strength of quadriceps femoris was significantly weaker in the femoral nerve block group than the control group in the first 12 hours (P<0.05). The side effects and infection rate between the two group had no significant difference (P>0.05). ConclusionThe femoral nerve block in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction before surgery has a good effect on postoperative analgesia and rehabilitation, which is worth popularizing and applying.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2016), WanFang Data, CBM, and CNKI were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty from inception to April 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs involving 1 001 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: There were no significant differences in pain scores at rest (SMD=0.02, 95%CI -0.23 to 0.27, P=0.86), morphine consumption on movement (MD=-1.85, 95%CI -4.67 to 0.97, P=0.20), incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (RD=0.02, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.08, P=0.41) and incidence of post-operative knee infection (RD=0.01, 95%CI -0.02 to 0.03, P=0.60) between the two groups, but he local infiltration analgesia group had lower length of stay than the femoral nerve block group with statistical difference (SMD=-0.24, 95%CI -0.41 to -0.07, P=0.005). ConclusionLocal infiltration analgesia provides similar postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty to femoral nerve block. However, due to the limited quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion still need to be verified by more high quality studies.
Objective To overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses of efficacy of FNB used as a postoperative analgesic technique among patients undergoing TKR. Methods We electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to July, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature and extracted data. AMSTAR tool was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. The primary outcome was pain scores and the consumption of opoid medicine to evaluate the effectiveness of FNB. Results A total of 16 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included, involving the FNBvs. LIA, PMDI, EA, PCA and ACB, respectively. The results of quality assessment indicated medium scores with 3 to 9 scores. The overviews’ results showed that: at rest, FNB was not superior to LIA at 6h after TKR; it was superior to PMDI at 12h after TKR; it was also superior to PCA and LIA, but not superior to ACB at 24h after TKR. On movement, FNB was superior to PCA and LIA at 24h after TKR; it was also superior to PCA at 48h after TKR. As to the consumption of opoid medicine, the consumption in FNB group was more than LIA group at 12h after TKR. In addition, the consumption in FNB group was less than PCA and LIA at 24h after TKR, and it was also less than PCA and ACB at 48h. The satisfaction of patients who received FNB was better than ACB, EA and PCA. Conclusion The current overview shows that FNB is more effective than PCA and LIA, the patients’ satisfaction is better. Due to the limitations of the quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions are needed to be verified by more studies.
Objectives To overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses of safety of femoral nerve block (FNB) used as a postoperative analgesic technique in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods We searched databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP from inception to July, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and used AMSTAR to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. The major indexes used to evaluate the safety of FNB were the incidence rates of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, sedation, retention of urine, dizziness, pruritus, hypotension, falls, nenous thromboembolism and deep infection. Results A total of 12 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included.They assessed the safety of FNB compared with local infiltration analgesia (LIA), periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI), epidural analgesia (EA), patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of opioids (PCA) and adductor canal block (ACB), respectively. The methodological quality of included studies were medium, with the scores between 3 to 10. The results of overview indicated that: FNB had lower incidence rates of nausea and vomiting compared with EA and PCA, but had higher than ACB. FNB had lower incidence rates of sedation and retention of urine compared with EA and PCA. FNB had lower incidence rates of dizziness compared with EA and PCA, and lower incidence rate of hypotension compared with EA. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that FNB is safer than EA and PCA. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions are needed to be verified by more high-quality studies.