west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Fibular allograft" 2 results
  • TYPE C2 PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURE FIXATION USING LOCKING-PLATE WITH AN INTRAMEDULLARY FIBULAR ALLOGRAFT

    ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical results of locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation. MethodsBetween January 2011 and August 2012, 16 patients with proximal humeral fractures (AO type C2) were treated by locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft. The clinical data were retrospectively analysed. There were 5 males and 11 females with an average age of 64 years (range, 55-70 years). The injury causes were falling injury in 12 cases, traffic accident injury in 3 cases, and sports injury in 1 case. The duration between injury and operation ranged from 2 to 6 days (mean, 4.5 days). The imaging data were used to judge the fracture healing, and to measure the neck-shaft angle and the height of humeral head; the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), and Neer score were used to evaluate the function of the shoulder after surgery. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained in all patients; no complication of vascular and nerve injury occurred. Sixteen cases were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). All fractures healed at 18-24 weeks (mean, 20 weeks). No complication occurred as follows:re-displacement, necrosis, rejection reaction, and loosening or extraction of screws. At last follow-up, the neck-shaft angle was 126.6-136.9° (mean, 132.5°), showing a little lost when compared with intraoperative angle (130.5-138.0°, 134.0° on average). At 12 months after surgery, the height loss of humeral head was 1.8-4.6 mm (mean, 2.0 mm); the passive anteflexion of the shoulder was 130-160° (mean, 148°); the active anteflexion was 120-145° (mean, 136°); the external rotation was 30-65° (mean, 56°); the internal rotation was 15-25° (mean, 19°). And the DASH score was 2-53 (mean, 12); the SF-36 score was 50-95 (mean, 89). According to Neer score for shoulder function, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 87.5%. ConclusionLocking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation has satisfactory clinical results because of stable fixation, high clinical outcome scores, and low internal fixation failure.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research progress in treatment of proximal humeral fracture with fibular allograft and locking plate

    ObjectiveTo review the research progress in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with fibular allograft and locking plate.MethodsThe literature about the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with fibular allograft and locking plate was reviewed and analyzed from the aspects such as the biomechanics, imaging prognosis, and clinical prognosis.ResultsFibular allograft and locking plate can provide effective medial support for proximal humeral fracture and increase the strength of internal fixation system. Compared with locking plate, fibular allograft combined with locking plate can maintain better humeral neck-shaft angle and the humeral head height after operation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, and has better shoulder mobility and shoulder joint function, and does not increase the risk of complications.ConclusionFibular allograft combined with locking plate may be a new and effective treatment for proximal humeral fractures. However, the long-term follow-up results are insufficient, the final outcome of fibula is uncertain, and the long-term potential adverse reactions caused by this treatment are still indefinite.

    Release date:2020-02-20 05:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content