Objective To investigate a best method of obtaining the sural neurofasciocutaneous flap by observing the models of different pedicles based sural neurofasciocutaneous flaps in rabbits and the effect of different pedicles on the survival of the flaps. Methods Forty adult New Zealand rabbits (male or female, weighing 2.5-3.0 kg) were randomly divided into 4 groups (10 rabbits in each). The flaps of 7 cm × 1 cm were designed at the lateral hind legs, and the pedicle was 0.5 cmin length. In group A, the flaps were elevated based on a single perforator pedicle; in group B, the flaps were elevated based on fascia pedicle; in group C, the flaps were elevated based on perforator-plus fascia pedicle; and in group D, the flaps were elevated and sutured in situ. At 7 days after operation, the flap survival rate was recorded, and the blood flow in the center of the flap was monitored by laser doppler flowmetry. The perfusion unit (PU) was measured. Results After operation, the flaps had no obvious swell ing, and the flaps had good color at the proximal end, but pale at the distal end in groups A and B. Obvious swell ing was observed with pale color at the distal flaps in group C, but swell ing decreased gradually. However, the skin color became dark gradually in group D after operation. The flap survival rates were 74.0% ± 2.7%, 60.0% ± 2.5%, 75.0% ± 3.5%, and 0 in groups A, B, C, and D respectively after 7 days of operation. The PU values were 83.39 ± 4.25, 28.96 ± 13.49, 81.85 ± 5.93, and 8.10 ± 3.36 in groups A, B, C, and D respectively. There were significant differences in flap survival rates and PU values between groups A, B, C and group D (P lt; 0.05). Significant differences were found between groups A, C and group B (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference between group A and group C (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The sural neurofasciocutaneous flap based on a single perforator pedicle has a rel iable blood supply and enough venous drainage, which is one of the best methods to obtain the sural neurofasciocutaneous flap.
Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative body temperature on the survival of skin flap grafting. Methods From July 2005 to November 2006, 50 cases of Ⅰ-Ⅱ grade patients undergoing elective skin flap grafting were randomly divided 2 groups. Pharyngeal temperature (PT) and skin temperature(ST) were monitored and recorded every 15 minutes. Operativetime, anesthetic time, time from the end of operation to extubation, the volume of blood transfusion, the volume of fluid transfusion and the flap survival 7 days after operation were recorded. In the experimental group, the body temperature was maintained in normal range with water market and forced air heater. In the control group， the body temperature was only monitored without any treatment. Results There were no significant differences in operating room temperature, operative time, anesthetic time, the volume of blood transfusion and fluid transfusion between 2 groups(Pgt;0.05). After induction, PT decreased gradually inboth groups during the first 45 minutes, compared with the time point of intubation(Plt;0.05),but there were no significant differences between the 2 groups(Pgt;0.05); and ST rose in both groups during the first45 minutes, compared with the time point of intubation (Plt;0.05). After 45 minutes of induction, in the experimental group, PT was in the normal range(36℃), and ST didn’t change compared with that of the timepoint of induction(Pgt;0.05). In the control group, both PT and ST decreasedgradually and timedependently compared with the time point of intubation (Plt;0.05). In the experimental group, PT and ST at each time point were higher than those in the control group (Plt;0.05). All the skin flap grafts survived in the experimental group, and skin flap grafts necrosed in 2 cases in the control group.Conclusion Keeping normal body temperature can improve the survival ofskin flap grafting. Therefore, the body temperature should be monitored and maintained in a normal range.
Objective To compare the effects of flap delay and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on the viability of the rat dorsal flap. Methods Thirty rats were divided into 3 groups: saline group, flap delay group and VEGF group. The rats in flap delay group underwent flap delay by keeping bipedicle untouched, and the cranial pedicle was cut 7 days later. The rats in VEGF group were given VEGF solution locally when the flaps were elevated in the operation. The ratsin saline group were given saline solution in the same way. Five days after thesingle pedicle flaps were performed, the flap survival rate was measured. Theflap tissues were collected to measure and analyze the microvascular density, diameter and sectional area by immunochemical method. Results The flap survival rate of flap delay group was similar to that of VEGF group andthere is no statistically significant difference(Pgt;0.05). The vascular diameter of flap delay group was much larger than that of saline group and VEGF group, showing statistically significant difference (Plt;0.05). The vascular density of VEGF group was much higher than that of saline group and flap delay group, showing statistically significant difference (Plt;0.05). The vascular sectional area of flap delay group was similar to that of VEGF group(Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The change in the flap after flap delayis manifested as obvious dilatation of microvessels, while the change in the flap after the injection of VEGF is manifested as obvious vascular proliferation. Both flap delay and VEGF can increase the vascular sectional area and the viability of the flap, but the mechanism is different.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of subcutaneous tissue trimming on the survival skin area of avulsion skin flap. METHODS: Degloving injury was created in bilateral hind limbs of 7 pigs with avulsion injury machine, 4 cm x 10 cm avulsion skin flaps were elevated in degloving areas. Skin flaps in one side were replanted as control without any treatment. Subcutaneous tissue in the skin flaps of another side was partially excised and replanted by trimmed skin flaps. Survival skin flaps was calculated with computer at 7 days after operation. RESULTS: In the control group, the survival skin area was (40.41 +/- 9.23)%, while in the experimental group, the survival skin area was (60.90 +/- 15.26)%. There was significant difference between the two groups (P lt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: Trimming off subcutaneous tissue does improve the survival area of avulsion skin flap.