ObjectiveTo identify causal effects and potential mechanisms of oxidative stress (OS) genes in lung cancer. MethodsOS-related genes were extracted from the GeneCards database. Integration analysis of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for lung cancer with gene expression and DNA methylation quantitative trait loci (eQTL and mQTL) in blood was performed using the summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) approach to determine the causal relationship between OS genes and lung cancer risk. Colocalization analysis of OS gene QTLs and lung cancer risk loci was performed to gain insight into the potential regulatory mechanisms of lung cancer risk. ResultsA potential causal relationship between OS-related genes and lung cancer was identified by SMR analysis. AGER expression level was found to be associated with lung cancer risk [OR=1.944, 95%CI (1.431, 2.640), P<0.001], and ATF6B expression level was associated with lung cancer risk [OR=1.508, 95%CI (1.287, 1.767), P<0.001]. Meanwhile, ATF6B methylation level was associated with lung cancer risk. ConclusionOS-related genes are associated with lung cancer, which may be a potential site of action for anti-cancer drugs.
Objective To investigate the association between neuroticism and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods Exposure and outcome data were downloaded from the IEU database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/), containing summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for neuroticism (n=374 323) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (n=602 604). Using the weighted median (WM), MR-Egger, inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted mode and simple mode methods for Mendelian randomization analysis. Odds ratio (OR) values were used to assess the causal relationship, while sensitivity analysis was used to ensure the accuracy of the results. ResultsNeuroticism (OR=1.229, 95%CI 1.186-1.274, P<0.001) was associated with an increased risk of GERD. Meanwhile, gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR=1.786, 95%CI 1.623-1.965, P<0.001) was also associated with increased risk of neuroticism. Conclusion The study finds a bidirectional causal relationship between neuroticism and gastroesophageal reflux disease.
ObjectiveTo explore whether there is a causal relationship between intestinal flora and esophageal cancer. MethodsSummary statistics of intestinal flora and esophageal cancer were obtained from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) database. Five methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median estimation, Mendelian randomization (MR)-Egger regression, single mode, and weighted mode, were used for analysis, with IVW as the main analysis method. Sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the reliability of MR results. ResultsIn the IVW method, Oxalobacteraceae [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.023], Faecalibacterium [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.028], Senegalimassilia [OR=1.002, 95%CI (1.000, 1.003), P=0.006] and Veillonella [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.018] were positively correlated with esophageal cancer, while Burkholderiales [OR=0.999, 95%CI (0.998, 1.001), P=0.002], Eubacterium oxidoreducens [OR=0.998, 95%CI (0.997, 0.999), P=0.038], Romboutsia [OR=0.999, 95%CI (0.998, 1.000), P=0.048] and Turicibacter[OR=0.998, 95%CI (0.997, 0.999), P=0.013] were negatively correlated with esophageal cancer. Sensitivity analysis showed no evidence of heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy and reverse causality. ConclusionOxalobacteraceae, Faecalibacterium, Senegalimassilia and Veillonella increase the risk of esophageal cancer, while Burkholderiales, Eubacterium oxidoreducens, Romboutsia and Turicibacter decrease the risk of esophageal cancer. Further studies are needed to explore how these bacteria affect the progression of esophageal cancer.