目的:探讨腹股沟马鞍疝无张力疝修补手术方式的选择。方法:回顾性调查206例腹股沟马鞍疝患者,其中行巴德网塞充填式修补术57例,普里灵疝装置腹膜前间隙修补术149例,观察两种修补方式的手术时间、手术方式及要点、术后并发症、恢复情况、平均住院日及复发率。结果:两种方式修补的患者围手术期均无死亡。手术时间、恢复情况、术后平均住院天数和并发症两种方式差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。患者术后平均随访分别为(2.3±0.5)和(2.2±0.7)年,随访时间无统计学差异(Pgt;0.05)。普里灵疝装置修补组的费用较巴德网塞组低。57例巴德网塞修补术后有2例复发,149例普里灵疝装置腹膜前间隙修补术后无复发。结论:腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术是腹股沟马鞍疝的首选手术方式。
Objective The present study is to compare the quality of life and anxiety of patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma who received different managements to guide clinical therapy and nursing. Methods Thiswas a cohort study. Patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma were divided into observation group (puncture confirmed only) and surgery group (confirmed and surgery) according to their wishes, and patients’ survival quality and state of anxiety were compared by using Short-Form 36 Health Survey Scale (SF-36) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) between the 2 groups during the follow up period. Results There was no significant difference in physical component summary (PCS) score between the 2 groups and different observation time points (P>0.05). The mental component summary (MCS) scores and SF-36 scores of the observation group and the surgery group were different (P<0.05), and the MCS scores and SF-36 scores were different at different time points (P<0.05). The HAMA scores of patients in the observation group and the surgery group were different (P<0.001), and the change of HAMA scores in the observation group and the surgery group were different (P=0.004), but the HAMA scores at different time points were similar (P=0.152). Conclusion Surgery can effectively reduce the anxiety and improve the MCS score and quality of life.