Four hundred and twenty six laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)were peformed on patients with acute and subacute cholecystitis,including ①emergency LC(59 patients),②selected LC(215 patients following administration of antibiotic and antispasmotic drugs for 10-15days),and ③selected LC(152 patients with mild biliary colic without any medication).Operative findings were ①congestion and edema of the gallbladder(208cases,11 of them were achieved laparocystectomy),②impaction of stones in the cystic infundibulum or duct with hydrops of gallbladder(142 cases,14 of them were achieved by laparocystectomy),and ③gangrene or empyema of gallbladder(76 patients,20 of them were achieved by laparocystectomy).LC was done successfully on 377 cases,conversion to open surgery was 45 cases (10.6%),severe complication occured on 4 patients for LC(reoperation,0.9%).The quthors believe that LC for patients with acute and subacute cholecystitis issafe and suitable,but LC cannot replace the classical laparocystectomy.
From the March of 1993 to the May of 1994, we had performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for 200 patients of the age ranged 19-77 years. In these cases, 12 had previous abdominal surgery; 3 cases had hepatic cysts; 11 cases had stones in the neck of gall bladders. We had successfully performed LC for 190 cases (95%). But we also had some unsuccesful experiences, including accidental injury to the stomach or duodenum, and bleeding from cystic arteris of the gallbladder. Operation (LC) was abandoned in one patient because of severe cardiac arrhyshmia developed during operation, and billiary tract injury was found postoperatively in three patients with no postoperative death. The operative indications and technical problems of LC are discussed in detail and measures in avoiding injury to billiary or GI tract from LC are introduced.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of gallbladder stone in dialysis patients, determine whether it is higher than that in the general population, find out the difference of prevalence between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, and analyzes the possible causes. MethodsWe analyzed the prevalence of gallbladder stone in 358 dialysis patients (126 cases of hemodialysis and 232 cases of peritoneal dialysis) followed up in our hospital from January 2009 to October 2012. And we compared it with 376 patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5) and the general population. ResultsThe prevalence of gallbladder stone in dialysis patients followed up in our hospital was 23.5%, which was higher than CKD5 patients (P=0.002). The prevalence was significantly greater in dialysis patients than that in the general population (P<0.000 5). In the dialysis patients who were younger than sixty years old, the prevalence of gallbladder stone in peritoneal dialysis patients was obviously higher than that in the hemodialysis patients (P<0.05). The albumin level was significantly lower in peritoneal dialysis patients than in the hemodialysis patients. At the same time, cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, and the ratio of low density lipoprotein to high density lipoprotein were much higher with statistical significance. Logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (OR=2.581, P=0.001), female (OR=2.554, P=0.000), the primary disease (diabetes mellitus) (OR=1.947, P=0.044) and dialysis period (OR=1.000, P=0.006) were risk factors for gallbladder stone in dialysis patients. ConclusionThe prevalence of gallbladder stone in dialysis patients is higher than that in the general population. Peritoneal dialysis patients have more risk factors to get gallbladder stone than hemodialysis patients. Risk factors for gallbladder stone in dialysis patients are increasing age, female, primary disease (diabetes mellitus), dyslipidemia, hypoalbuminemia, long dialysis period and so on.
ObjectiveTo investigate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stone. MethodsThe eligible patients with gallbladder stones hospitalized in our department between January 2007 and December 2011 were included, and all of them received either laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy (observation group) or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (control group) minimally-invasive surgery. The operation time, bleeding volume, enterokinesia recovery time, hospital stay, post-operative complication and follow-up results were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 148 patients were included, with 68 patients in the observation group and 80 patients in the control group. In this cohort, the success rate of surgery for the observation group and the control group was 100.0% (68/68) and 98.8% (79/80), respectively; and the success rate of complete stone removal was 100% for both two groups. B-ultrasound examination after 2 weeks of treatment showed that gallbladder wall was normal and gallbladder contraction rate was more than 30% for all patients with laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy. The operation time was (49.6±5.2) minutes for the observation group and (50.5±6.2) minutes for the control group, and bleeding volume was (9.5±1.4) mL for the observation group and (50.2±8.1) mL for the control group; the difference in bleeding volume was significant between the two groups (P<0.05). The difference in enterokinesia recovery time[(33.9±2.2) and (34.4±2.6) minutes] or hospital stay[(3.4±1.0) and (3.6±1.2) days] between the observation group and the control group was not significant (both P >0.05). The post-operative complications of bleeding, bile leakage and wound infection were not observed in both two groups, and all patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months with no stone recurrence; and only 2.7% of patients (1/37) had stone recurrence after 3-year follow-up. ConclusionBoth laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures are safe and efficient. However, laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy not only reserves gallbladder but also has superiority of less bleeding volume.