Objective To evaluate the changes of liver function after laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and analyze related impact factors. Methods Patients with gastric cancer or colon cancer, who underwent radical gastrectomy or hemicolectomy between Jun 2008 and Jun 2010 in General Hospital of PLA, were included in this study. These patients were divided into open gastrectomy （OG group, n=43）, laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy （LAG group, n=35）, and laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy （LAC group, n=23）. The serum AST, ALT, TB, and ALP levels of all patients enrolled on the preoperative day and post operative day （POD） 1, POD3, POD5, and POD7, and related impact factors were analyzed. Results Compared with the preoperative results, serum AST and ALT levels of patients increased until POD5 in both LAG and OG groups （P＜0.05）, and there was no changes in liver function after operation of patients in LAC group （P＞0.05）. In addition to that serum AST and ALT levels of patients in LAG group in POD1 were significantly higher than those in OG group （P=0.035 and P=0.041）， and that serum ALT level of patients in LAG group was significantly lower than that in OG group in POD3 （P=0.048）, serum AST and ALT levels of patients in two groups in the remaining time points were not statistically significant difference （P＞0.05）. The serum AST and ALT levels of patients in LAG group were significantly higher than those in LAC group during 5 d after operation （P＜0.05）.There was no significant changes of serum ALP and TB levels of patients in LAG and OG groups on the before and after operation （P＞0.05）. The increased serum ALT level of gastric cancer patients after operation related to body mass index （BMI, P=0.038）, operative time （P=0.011）, intraoperative hepatic injury （P=0.035）, and abnormal ligation of hepatic artery （P=0.048）, instead of the type of operation （OG vs.LAG, P＞0.05）. Conclusions Gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy have transient liver dysfunction, which attributes mainly to direct liver manipulation or abnormal ligation of hepatic artery, but not CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy is feasible and safe to the patients without serious liver damage or other vital organs disorders.
ObjectiveTo prospectively study the effect of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis with esophagogastrostomy and RouxenY gastrojejunostomy after proximal subtotal gastrectomy.MethodsTwentysix cases of carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia were allocated randomly to 2 groups (the control group with 12 cases and the experimental group with 14 cases) according to odd or even number of the admission number.After proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy, the control group underwent pyloroplasty while the experimental group with pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy.The inflammatory reaction of the tissue obtained at the esophagogastric junction using a fiber gastroscope was observed after half year of postoperative followup in the two groups.An examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal were performed.According to the Visick score of followup data,the effects of operation were evaluated.The 5year survival rate was also evaluated.ResultsThe postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the experimental group were slighter than those in the control group.The examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal showed that the gastric emptying time of a half dose,gastric remains rates of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min in the experimental group were similar to those in the control healthy people group.But in the control group,the gastric emptying time of a half dose delayed,and the gastric remains rate of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min were higher than the other groups.The biopsy study of the esophagogastric junction showed that the inflammatory reaction in the experimental group was slighter than that in the control group.There was no significant difference between the two groups in the survival rate.ConclusionFor patients with carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia, after proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy,compared with pyloroplasty,pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy can decrease the reflux esophagitis,and relieve the postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms.
Objective To study the clinical significance of total gastrectomy in treatment for gastric cardia cancer.Methods The clinical data of 118 patients with gastric cardia cancer underwent operation from May 1997 to October 2012 in the Department of General Surgery of Baiyin Hospital， Affiliated to Lanzhou University were analyzed retrospe-ctively. Among these 118 patients， there were 65 patients treated by total gastrectomy （total gastrectomy group） and 53patients treated by proximal gastrectomy （proximal gastrectomy group）. The postoperative complications， survival rate，quality of life， and nutrition indexes were compared after operation between the total gastrectomy group and the prox-imal gastrectomy group. Results ① The incidence of postoperative complications was 7.7% （5/65） and 13.2% （7/53） in the total gastrectomy group and the proximal gastrectomy group， respectively， the difference was not statistically signi-ficant （χ2=0.972， P=0.248）. ② 1-， 3-， and 5-year survival rate after operation were 63.1%， 46.2%， and 30.8% in thetotal gastrectomy group；which were 66.0%， 36.9%， and 18.5% in the proximal gastrectomy group. The difference of 1-year survival rate after operation was not statistically significant in two groups （χ2=0.193， P=0.402）， the 3- and the 5-year survival rates of the total gastrectong group were significantly higher than those of the proximal gastrectony group （χ2=4.508， P=0.022；χ2=30.271， P=0.000）. ③ The Spitzer quality of life score had no difference at the different timeafter operation in two groups （P＞0.05）. Compared with the proximal gastrectomy group， the points of heartburn， swallo-wing problem， appetite， and food intake on 12 months after operation in the total gastrectomy group were higher （P＜0.05）， the points of the other indexes had no significant differences （P＞0.05）. ④ The nutrition indexes after operationhad no differences at the different time after operation in two groups （P＞0.05）. Conclusions Total gastrectomy in treatment for gastric cardia cancer would not increase complications， also can improve 5-year survival for patients withⅠ-Ⅲ stage， and survival condition after operation is also much better than that of proximal gastrectomy.
Objective To investigate the cause of the positive cancer cell incisal margin in gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Methods Thirty-two cases with positive incisal margin in gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma from 1988-1993 in this hospital were retrospectively studied. Results The overall cancer cell positive rate (CCPR) was 7.5%, and that of radical and palliative resection were 5.5% and 12.6%, respectively (Ｐ＜0.05). The CCPR of distal and proximal incisal margin were 5.9% and 13.0% respectively (Ｐ＜0.05), which was related to the gross type, size of cancer, and the degree of differentiation and infiltration. Conclusion The CCPR is high in the infiltrating type, lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter and undifferentiated cancer. To prevent the incisal margin positive for cancer cell in gastrectomy, frozen biopsy should be done if possible.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical recovery and immune response between laparoscopic-assisted and open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 53 patients with advanced gastric cancer from January 2012 to October 2013 were studied prospectively. According to random number table, patients were randomly divided into laparoscopic-assisted group(LA group, n=27) and open operation group(OO group, n=26). Operative time, blood loss, time to passage of flatus, time to resume soft diet, after bed time, postoperative hospital stay, and number of retrieved lymph nodes were compared respectively between the two groups. The changes in CD3, CD4+, CD8+, IgG, IgA, IgM, and CRP were examined respectively by using flow cytometry and immunoturbidimetric assays on the preoperative day 1, and on the postoperative day 1 and 7. ResultsThe operative time was longer significantly in LA group than that in OO group(P < 0.05). The mean blood loss, the first flatus time, after bed time, and postoperative hospital stay in the two groups were all different statistically(P < 0.05), and all were better in LA group. However, the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes and the time to resume soft diet were not significantly different in the two groups(P > 0.05). On the day 1 and 7 after operation, the CD3, CD4+, and CD8+ significantly decreased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.01, P < 0.05). On the day 1 after operation, the levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM significantly decreased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.05). Those immunoglobulin in LA group recovered to close to the level before surgery, but in OO group sustained lower level(P < 0.05). On the day 1 and 7 after operation, CRP level significantly increased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Those changes of above index were not significantly different between the LA group and OO group on the day 1 after operation(P > 0.05). All index recovered gradually in the two groups on the day 7 after operation and were better in LA group(P < 0.05, except IgA). ConclusionLaparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer resulted in a quicker clinical recovery and a lesser depression to the perioperative cellular and humoral immune function.
ObjectiveTo assess postoperative analgesia and early rehabilitation of continuous incision infiltration with ropivacaine in open gastrectomy. MethodsFrom June 2011 to October 2014, 50 patients underwent open gastrectomy were divided into two groups:standard analgesic therapy group (Abbreviation:standard group, n=25) and continuous incision infiltration with ropivacaine group (Abbreviation:ropivacaine group, n=25). All the patients were also given patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Points of visual analog scale (VAS), Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS), and nausea and vomiting were assessed at different time during the first 48 hours postoperatively. Total sufentanil dosage, the first postoperative ambulation time, bowel recovery time, postoperative hospital stay, and incision infection rate were compared between two groups. ResultsAt 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, 24 h, 48 h postoperatively, the points of VAS in the ropivacaine group were significantly lower than those in the standard group (P < 0.05), the points of BCS in the ropivacaine group were significantly higher than those in the standard group (P < 0.05). Compared with the standard group, the dosage of sufentanil was significantly less (P < 0.05), the bowel recovery time, the first postoperative ambulation time, and the postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter (P < 0.05), the point of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower (P < 0.05) at 48 h postoperatively in the ropivacaine group. There was no difference of the incision infection rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionContinuous incision infiltration with ropivacaine is effective and safe to relief postoperative pain and accelerate patient's recovery after open gastrectomy.
ObjectiveTo compare the results of laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative resection and open surgery for gasric stromal tumor. MethodsFrom January 2010 to March 2015, the clinical data of 56 cases undergoing laparoscopic resection for gasric stromal tumor and 53 cases of traditional operation selected during the same period were retrospectively compared. ResultsThere was no significant difference between two groups in patient's gender, age, body weight, size of tumor, tumor staging, method of operation, intraoperative conditions, postoperative overall complications, local recurrence, and distant metastasis. There were 1 case with the rupture of tumor and 1 case of open surgery transforming in laparoscopic group. In another group, there was the absence of the rupture of tumors. There was no mortality, stomach bleeding, stenosis or leakage occurred between two groups. In laparoscopic group, there were less operative blood loss and abdominal drainage, shorter time of postoperative anal exhaust time, fewer anodyne, a reduction of hospital stay than in convention operation group.However, laparoscopic resection required greater hospital costs and longer operative time. There were significant differences between two groups (P < 0.05). Conciusions With advantages of less blood loss and quicker recovery as compared to conventional operation. Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative resection for gasric stromal tumor has similar effect when it is performed by well selection of cases, skilled surgeon with experience on open resection for surgical treatment of gastric stromal tumor.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) versus laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for patients with gastric cancer. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched to collect cohort studies about TLTG vs. LATG for gastric cancer from inception to February 28th 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of six cohort studies were included, of which 407 cases were in the TLTG group, and 315 cases were in the LATG group. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with LATG group, patients in TLTG group had shorter operation time (MD=–8.97, 95%CI –16.21 to –1.73, P=0.02), and initial postoperative feeding time (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.57 to –0.03, P=0.03). However, the anastomic time, bleeding volume, the number of dissected lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, initial flatus time, postoperative hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, anastomotic fistula, and anastomotic stenosis were similar between two groups (all P values>0.05)． Conclusions Compared with LATG, TLTG has shorter operation and recovery time for patients with gastric cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.