Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of somatostatin analogs versus placebo for Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP and CBM were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) about somatostatin analogs for Graves’ Ophthalmopathy (GO) pulished by March 2012, while the bibliographies of the included literatue were also retrieved. According to the inclusion criteria, two reviewers screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 5 RCTs involving 210 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that somatostatin analogs could reduce the clinical activity score (CAS) of GO patients (MD=0.58, 95%CI 0.02 to1.13, P=0.04), but the effects in reducing the degree of proptosis (mm) was still unverifiable (MD=0.21, 95%CI –0.14 to 0.56, P=0.24). It did not show obvious effects for diplopia, orbital volume, intraocular pressure, visual acuity or the restriction of eye movements. The existing evidence could not confirm that somatostatin analogs were effective for GO (OR=1.32, 95%CI 0.45 to 3.9, P=0.61). Conclusion Somatostatin analogs can reduce the CAS of GO patients, but without significantly clinical significance. Moreover, the effect of reducing proptosis is sitll unverifiable. So the existing evidence cannot confirm that somatostatin analogs are effective for GO. For the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies, this conclusion needs to be proved by performing more high quality RCTs.
目的 探讨碘131（131I）治疗后Graves眼病（GO）预后与血清促甲状腺激素受体抗体（TRAb）水平变化之间的关系。 方法 选择2011年5月－12月初发Graves病患者238例，分为GO组124 例和非GO组114 例，分别检测131I治疗前及131I治疗后2、3、6个月甲状腺功能和TRAb，GO患者131I治疗前和治疗后6 个月进行临床活动度评分（CAS）。 结果 131I治疗前各组TRAb水平差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），TRAb水平与GO CAS评分之间无相关；131I治疗后6个月所有患者TRAb水平显著增加；非GO组有5例新发GO，新发GO组与其他患者的TRAb水平分别为（58.7 ± 77.9）、（61.9 ± 81.1）U/L，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；GO组又分为GO无变化29例，GO加重17例，GO缓解78例，三组患者TRAb水平分别为（53.5 ± 77.6）、（66.2 ± 89.9）、（66.8 ± 42.2）U/L，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论 131I治疗后患者TRAb水平显著增加，但TRAb水平的变化和GO预后无关，TRAb与GO的关系还需要进一步研究。
ObjectiveTo compare the radiation dose distribution in irradiated target area and organs at risk among conventional radiotherapy, conformal radiotherapy and semi-field conformal radiotherapy in Graves' ophthalmopathy patients. MethodsThirty patients with Grave's ophthalmopathy treated between January 2010 and December 2012 were included in this study.CT scan was performed to obtain images of each patients; three-dimensional planning system (3D-TPS) was done to design conventional radiotherapy, conformal radiotherapy and semi-field conformal radiotherapy for each patient.Then, we counted the standard deviation of study parameters for each radiotherapy technique, and the results were compared among the three groups. ResultsAverage irradiation dose in target area of patients accepting conventional irradiation, conformal irradiation and semi-field conformal irradiation therapy was not significantly different (P > 0.05).V95 and the conformity index values of conformal irradiation and semi-field conformal irradiation therapy were better than those of the conventional irradiation therapy (P < 0.001), while no significant difference between conformal irradiation and semi-field conformal irradiation therapy was detected (P > 0.05).Patients accepting conventional irradiation got the highest cumulative irradiation dose in eye lens, while patients accepting semi-field conformal irradiation therapy got the lowest irradiation dose in eye lens, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05).Patients accepting conventional irradiation got the highest cumulative irradiation dose in pituitary, while cumulative irradiation dose in pituitary in patients accepting conformal irradiation and semi-field conformal irradiation therapy was not significantly different (P > 0.05). ConclusionsConformal irradiation and semi-field conformal irradiation techniques are superior to conventional irradiation technique, with a better target conformal degree and higher does distribution in target area, as well as a lower radiation dose in normal tissues surrounding target area.Semi-field conformal irradiation technique has a better performance than conformal irradiation therapy in eye lens protection.
Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) is an autoimmune disease, and there is no specific treatment drug. Glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is still the first-line therapy for patients with moderate to severe GO. Targeted therapy may become a novel treatment due to GC’s adverse drug reactions. As the in-depth study of the pathogenesis of GO, many targeted drugs with randomized clinical trial (RCT) treatment have appeared in recent years, such as anti-insulin growth factor 1 receptor (teprotumumab), anti-CD20 (rituximab) and anti-interleukin(IL)-6 receptor (tocilizumab). It is worth noting that teprotumumab has been approved by US Food and Drug Administration in recently, and may quickly become the first-line therapy for GO. The anti-B cell stimulating factor (belimumab) which is undergoing RCT is waiting for the result of RCT to reveal. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (such as etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab) which only used in case reports requires RCT further verification. In addition, anti-IL-17/IL-23, thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, CD40 targets and target therapies may have potential clinical value for GO due to the successful use of these target therapies in vitro experiments and other autoimmune diseases. This paper focus on the progress of targeted therapy of GO in China and abroad in recent years.