Objective To compare the effectiveness of the traditional center of tibial plateau as the entry point and digital technology in the design of intramedullary tibial nail point positioning method in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Between October 2011 and October 2012, 60 cases undergoing unilateral TKA and meeting the selection criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups: in group A (30 cases), the tibial plateau center as the entry point of tibial intramedullary positioning was used; in group B (30 cases), Mimics 10.01 software to simulate the guide rod point of tibial intramedullary positioning was used. There was no significant difference in gender, age, etiology, disease duration, sides, and preoperative knee range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Postoperative X-ray films were taken to measure the tibiofemoral angle and tibial angle; knee range of motion, and HSS and WOMAC scores were used to assess the activity of knee. Results The entry point of group B was located in front of the center of tibial plateau, which was inconsistent with the traditional entry point. The incision healed by first intention in all patients of 2 groups. The patients were followed up 6 to 12 months (mean, 8.6 months). The X-ray measurement at 1 week after operation showed no significant difference in tibiofemoral angle between 2 groups (t= — 6.65, P=0.72), but the anteroposterior and lateral tibial angles of group A were significantly lower than those of group B (P lt; 0.05). The knee range of motion, HSS score, and WOMAC score of 2 groups were significantly higher at 3 and 6 months after operation when compared with preoperative values (P lt; 0.05), and the values at 6 months were significantly increased than those at 3 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). HSS score and WOMAC score had no significant difference between 2 groups at 3 months after operation (P gt; 0.05), but the scores of group B were significantly higher than those of group A at 6 months (P lt; 0.05). The knee range of motion of group B was significantly better than that of group A at 3 months after operation (t=2.13, P=0.04), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 6 months (t=0.58, P=0.56). Conclusion Compared with the traditional intramedullary guide rod insertion point positioning, digital individualized design of entry point positioning has the advantages of more accurate lower limb force line, better recovery of knee function, and earlier 90°activities, but the long-term effectiveness needs further observation.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fracture in the elderly by treating with folding top technique and right-angle pliers prying and pulling under G-arm X-ray fluoroscopy. Methods The clinical data of 74 elderly patients with irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fracture admitted between February 2016 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 38 cases were treated with folding top technique combined with right-angle pliers prying and pulling under G-arm X-ray fluoroscopy and intramedullary nailing fixation (study group), and 36 cases were treated with limited open reduction combined with other reduction methods and intramedullary nailing fixation (control group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups, such as age, gender, cause of injury, affected side and classification of fractures, complicated medical diseases, and time from injury to operation (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture reduction time, fracture healing time, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by Baumgaertner et al. and Chang et al. fracture reduction standards. ResultsPatients in both groups were followed up 10-14 months, with an average of 12 months. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). At 2 days after operation, according to the fracture reduction standards of Baumgaertner et al. and CHANG Shimin et al., the quality of fracture reduction in the study group was better than that in the control group, and the fracture reduction time in the study group was shorter than that in the control group, with significant differences (P<0.05). After operation, the fractures of the two groups all healed, and there was no significant difference in healing time between the two groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no complication such as incision infection, internal fixation failure, deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs, intramedullary nail breakage, spiral blade cutting, or hip varus in the two groups, except for 2 cases of coxa vara in the control group. Conclusion For the irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fracture, using folding top technique combined with right-angle pliers prying and pulling under G-arm X-ray fluoroscopy can obviously shorten the operation time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, and improve the quality of fracture reduction.