ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy, and to evaluate whether MLNR can be used as a reference tool to guide the formulation of postoperative adjuvant treatment strategies and prognosis prediction of gastric cancer.MethodsThe clinicopathologic features of patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy from January 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The factors influencing the disease specific survival of gastric cancer were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model, then the variables with statistical significance in multivariate analysis were included in the construction of nomograms model for prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.ResultsA total of 262 patients with gastric cancer were included. There was no correlation between MLNR and total number of lymph nodes (rs=0.037, P=0.547), there was a positive correlation between MLNR and pN stage (rs=0.909, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that pT stage, pN stage, MLNR, and postoperative chemotherapy were the independent predictors of prognosis of gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy. Four variables including pT stage, pN stage, postoperative chemotherapy, and MLNR were included in the construction of nomogram model, the C index of MLNR and pN stage model was 0.707 and 0.692 respectively. Survival analysis showed that the higher the MLNR, the worse the prognosis.ConclusionsThe ability of MLNR to predict prognosis of gastric cancer might be better than pN stage. Therefore, it is considered that MLNR could be used as an important evaluation tool to guide adjuvant treatment and prognosis prediction after radical gastrectomy.
ObjectiveTo explore value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion in comprehensive downstaging treatment of liver cancer.MethodThe clinical data of 2 patients with liver cancer who could not undergo the radical surgery admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsCase 1 was diagnosed as the liver cancer with extensive double lung metastasis at admission. The clinical stage was stage Ⅲb; After MDT discussion, the patient was treated with chemotherapy and embolization via hepatic artery and bronchial artery; At the same time, the patient was treated with apatinib; At present, the metastasis of both lungs disappeared completely; The clinical stage was stage ⅡB, and the radical resection was proposed. Case 2 was diagnosed as the right liver cancer at admission. The clinical stage was stage Ⅰ b. The preoperative examination showed that the hepatic reserve function was poor and the patient could not tolerate the half hepatectomy; After MDT discussion, the patient was treated with the combination of chemotherapy and embolization via the hepatic artery and apatinib in the same period; At the same time, the patient was treated with liver protection. The clinical stage was reduced to stage Ⅰ a. The hepatic reserve function improved and the laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy was performed, no recurrence or metastasis was found after 3 months follow-up.ConclusionComprehensive downstaging treatment based on MDT model could bring better clinical outcomes for patients with liver cancer who are unable to undergo one-stage radical surgery.