Objective To compare the advantages between SmartCare weaning and protocoldirected weaning in COPD patients regarding five aspects including comfort degree of COPD patients in weaning stage, workload of medical staff, weaning success rate, weaning time, and complications associated with mechanical ventilation. Methods COPD patients who’s planning to receive ventilation weaning were randomly divided into a SmartCare weaning group ( SC group) and a protocol-directed weaning group ( SBT group) . The comfort degree of patients and workload of medical staff were assessed by the visual analogue scale ( VAS) as the weaning plan started. 0 was for the most discomfort and maximal workload, and 10 was for the most comfort and minimal workload. Data fromthe following aspects had been recorded: times of blood gas analysis, weaning success rate, weaning time, self-extubation rate, the rate of re-intubation within 48 hours, and ventilator-associated pneumonia ( VAP) incidences. Results 40 patients were selected and divided into the SC group ( n =19) and the SBT group ( n =21) . There was no significant difference in the enrolled age and APACHEⅡ between two groups. The VAS scores was higher in the SC group than that in the SBT group in the first three days ( Plt;0.01) . The weaning time was shorter in the SBT group than that in the SBT group [ ( 4.7 ±2.7) days vs. ( 5.5 ±3.2) days] , without significant difference between two groups ( P gt;0.05) . There were no differences in times of blood gas analysis, weaning success rate, weaning time, self-extubation rate, the rate of re-intubation within 48 hours, and ventilator-associated pneumonia ( VAP) incidences between two groups ( P gt; 0.05) .Conclusion As compared with protocol-directed weaning, SmartCare weaning can increase comfort degree of patients and reduce the workload of medical staff with similar weaning success rate, weaning time, and complications associated with mechanical ventilation.
Objective To evaluate the safety and diagnostic yield of transbronchial lung biopsy ( TBLB) performed in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods TBLB was performed in 19 mechanically ventilated patients form January 2001 to September 2007 in the ICU of Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Diseases. The results of clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 19 patients were analyzed[ 9 female, 10 male, with amean age of ( 57. 94 ±15. 00) years] . Specific diagnoses were made in 9 cases ( 47. 4% ) by TBLB. The diseases included pulmonary aspergillus pneumonia in 4 cases ( 21. 0% ) ,lung cancer in 2 cases ( 10. 5% ) , radioactive pneumonia in 1 case( 5. 3% ) , Goodpasture’s syndrome in1case( 5. 3% ) , pulmonary tuberculosis in 1 case ( 5. 3% ) . Ten cases ( 52. 6% ) were not able to establish confirmed diagnoses including pulmonary interstitial fibrosis in 6 cases( 31. 6% ) and lung tissue nonspecific changes in 4 cases( 21. 0% ) . The treatment was adjusted according to the results of TBLB in 10 patients( 52. 6% ) . Complications associated with this procedure included episodes of bronchial hemorrhage of ≥30 mL in 4 cases ( 21. 0% ) , transient oxygen desaturation in 11 cases ( 57. 9% ) , hypotension in 5 cases ( 26. 3% ) , and transient tachycardia in 1 case ( 5. 3% ) without death and pneumothorax. Conclusions TBLB can be performed safely and has a diagnostic value in mechanically ventilated patients. TBLB should be considered as a diagnostic procedure before open lung biopsy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors affecting enteral nutrition tolerance in patients accepting prone position ventilation.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the tolerance of enteral nutrition in patients with prone position ventilation from January 2013 to December 2018. The single factor and multiple factors were used to analyze the influencing factors of enteral nutrition tolerance in patients accepting prone position ventilation.ResultsNinety-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into 2 groups according to enteral nutrition tolerance table: 45 patients with good tolerance and 47 patients with poor tolerance. Univariate analysis showed age, use of muscle relaxants, albumin, prealbumin, feeding amount per unit time, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), nutrition risk in critically ill (NUTRIC) score and gastric residual volume were factors affecting the patient's tolerance (P<0.05). Logistic analysis showed that the factors affecting the patient's tolerance during the prone position were age, use of muscle relaxant, albumin, prealbumin, APACHEⅡ, SOFA, and NUTRIC scores (P<0.05).ConclusionFactors affecting enteral nutrition tolerance in patients accepting prone position ventilation are age, use of muscle relaxants, albumin, prealbumin, APACHEⅡ, SOFA and NUTRIC scores.
Objective To investigate the value of Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) in ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods A single center retrospective observational study was conducted. The AECOPD patients who needed mechanical ventilation, admitted to ICU from January 2015 to June 2016 were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups according to the MST score, ie. a high risk malnutrition group (MST score≥2) and a low risk malnutrition group (MST score<2). The principle factors were analyzed including ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), length of ICU stay, and ICU readmission rate within 48 hours. Meanwhile the patients’ demographic and laboratory data were analyzed. Results A total of 101 patients were enrolled with 77 cases in the high risk malnutrition group and 24 cases in the low risk malnutrition group. The gender (χ2=1.882, P=0.172), age (t=1.091, P=0.33) and APACHE Ⅱ score (t=1.475, P=0.16) were similar in two groups. The high risk malnutrition group had significantly lower BMI (t=2.887, P=0.004) and lymphocyte count (t=3.402, P<0.001) than the low risk malnutrition group. Hemoglobin (t=0.817, P=0.36), albumin (t=0.706, P=0.44), pre-albumin (t=1.782, P=0.08) and procalcitonin (t=1.296, P=0.17) were similar in two groups. The high risk malnutritiongroup had significantly longer IMV duration (χ2=2.181, P=0.035) and length of ICU stay (χ2=2.364, P=0.02) than the low risk malnutrition group. While the ICU mortality (χ2=0.212, P=0.645), in-hospital mortality (χ2=0.212, P=0.645) and ICU readmission rate within 48 hours (χ2=1.656, P=1.0) were similar in two groups. Conclusion MST is a valuable tool in ICU to evaluated the nutrition status of ventilated AECOPD patients, and MST≥2 indicates longer IMV duration and length of ICU stay.
ObjectiveTwitch transdiaphragmatic pressure is used to evaluate the diaphragm function of mechanical ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients before weaning in the intensive care unit, and compared with healthy normal values.MethodsPatients were recruited if they were with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, admitted between May to November in 2013 and December 2014 to February 2016 to the intensive care unit in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, intubated and mechanical ventilated more than 72 hours, and recovered to the clinical stability states after passing the readiness to wean, getting ready for spontaneous breathing test. The newly designed esophageal electrode catheter and bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerves stimulation were utilized to detect the twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure. At the same time, the function of diaphragm was detected in 10 healthy adults for comparison.ResultsTwenty-two patients were recruited in this study. Two cases had no twitch signals. In the rest 20 cases, the twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure was (7.6±2.5) cm H2O. In 10 healthy adults, twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure was (26.7±4.9) cm H2O. There was significant difference between the patients and the health control subjects (P<0.05).ConclusionTwitch transdiaphragmatic pressure is significantly decreased in weaning chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients compared with healthy adults.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application value of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) performed in patients with unplanned extubation (UE) in intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis. The clinical data, application of NIV, reintubation rate and prognosis of UE patients in the ICU of this hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were reviewed, and the patients were assigned to the control group or the NIV group according to the application of NIV after UE. The data between the two groups were compared and the application effects of NIV in UE patients were evaluated.ResultsA total of 66 UE patients were enrolled in this study, including 44 males and 22 females and with an average age of (64.2±16.1) years. Out of them, 41 patients (62.1%) used nasal catheter or mask for oxygenation as the control group, 25 patients (37.9%) used NIV as the NIV group. The Acute Physiology andChronic Health EvaluationⅡ score of the control group and the NIV group were (18.6±7.7) vs. (14.8±6.3), P=0.043. The causes of respiratory failure in the control group and the NIV group were as follows: pneumonia 16 patients (39.0%) vs. 7 patients (28.0%), postoperative respiratory failure 7 patients (17.1%) vs. 8 patients (32.0%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 8 patients (19.5%) vs. 6 patients (24.0%), others 5 patients (12.2%) vs. 4 patients (16.0%), heart failure 3 patients (7.3%) vs. 0 patients (0%), nervous system diseases 2 (4.9%) vs. 0 patients (0%), which showed no significant difference between the two groups. Mechanical ventilation time before UE were (12.5±19.8) vs (12.7±15.2) d (P=0.966), PaO2 of the control group and the NIV group before UE was (114.9±37.4) vs. (114.4±46.3)mm Hg (P=0.964), and oxygenation index was (267.1±82.0) vs. (257.4±80.0)mm Hg (P=0.614). Reintubation rate was 65.9% in the control group and 24.0% in the NIV group (P=0.001). The duration of mechanical ventilation was (23.9±26.0) vs. (21.8±26.0)d (P=0.754), the length of stay in ICU was (34.4±36.6) vs. (28.5±25.8)d (P=0.48). The total mortality rate in this study was 19.7%. The mortality rate in the control group and NIV group were 22.0% and 16.0% (P=0.555).ConclusionPatients with UE in ICU may consider using NIV to avoid reintubation.
ObjectiveTo investigate whether noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) will improve preoxygenation in critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU) before intubation, when compared with bag-valve-mask (BVM).MethodsThis was a single-centered, prospective and randomized study. The patients in the study were those who required tracheal intubation in the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health from June 2015 to June 2017. These critically ill patients were provided with BVM or NIV assisted preoxygenation randomly. The data of the NIV group and the control group were compared and the application values of NIV in preoxygenation of critically ill patients were evaluated.ResultsA total of 106 patients participated in this study, including 75 males and 31 females and with an average age of (65.0±12.6) years. The patients were classified either into the control group (BVM assisted preoxygenation, n=53), or the NIV group (NIV assisted pre-oxygenation, n=53). The causes of intubation in the control group and the NIV group were as follows: pneumonia [40 patients (75.5%) vs. 39 patients (73.6%)], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [12 patients (22.6%) vs. 11 patients (20.8%)], and other disease [1 patient (1.9%) vs. 3 patients (5.7%)], which showed no significant difference between the two groups. The scores of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System Ⅱ of the control group and the NIV group were 20 (17, 26) vs. 20 (16, 26), P=0.86, which also showed no significant difference. The oxygen saturation of the pulse (SpO2) before preoxygenation were similar in both the control group and the NIV group 92% (85%, 98%) vs. 91% (85%, 98%), P=0.87. After preoxygenation, SpO2 was significantly higher in the NIV group than in the control group 99% (96%, 100%) vs. 96% (90%, 99%), P=0.001. For the subgroup of patients with SpO2 less than 90% before preoxygenation, the respective SpO2 in the control group and the NIV group were 83% (73%, 85%) vs. 81% (75%, 86%), P=0.75; after preoxygenation, SpO2 in the NIV group was significantly higher than in the control group 99% (96%, 100%) vs. 94%(90%, 99%), P=0.000. For the subgroup of patients with SpO2 of 90% or more before preoxygenation, the respective SpO2 in the control group and the NIV group were similar 95.5% (92%, 99%) vs. 96% (94%, 99%), P=0.52; and continued to be similar after preoxygenation 98% (95%, 100%) vs. 99% (96%, 100%), P=0.1. The duration of mechanical ventilation of the control group and the NIV group was 17 (10, 23)d vs. 19 (11, 26)d (P=0.86). The 28 days survival rate of the control group and the NIV group was 73.6% vs. 71.7% (P=0.34). The mortality rate in the control group and NIV group were 31.3% and 31.7% (P=0.66).ConclusionsWhen compared with the use of BVM, NIV assisted preoxygenation is effective and safe for critically ill patients. Critically ill patients with severe hypoxemia will benefit more from NIV assisted preoxygenation.