ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of the promotion of appropriate health technology in China and provide reference for improving the promotion of appropriate health technologies. MethodsDatabases including CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched for studies about the appropriate health technology in China from inception to August 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies by the evaluation criteria for descriptive studies of MAStARI, an assessment tool developed by JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center. And then, qualitative descriptive analysis method was used to comprehensively analyze the data from four aspects: medical institutions, regulators, technology promotion medical staff and patients. ResultsA total of 23 cross-sectional studies and one before-after study were included. The results of qualitative analysis showed that: 1) the technology utilization rate of appropriate health technology extension institutions was more than 70%, the number of outpatients of township and village organizations increased significantly than that of the county level institutions; 2) director of technology extension and managers of hospital were in favor of the promotion of appropriate technology for its good effectiveness, safety, lower medical costs, and skill improvement of medical staff; 3) medical staff mastered the appropriate health technology, they were willing to promote appropriate technology and spoke highly of it for its safety, feasibility and economic effect, and improved their level of technology; 4) in patients' opinion, the appropriate technology reduced the disease course and cost, they spoke highly of it for its acceptance, efficacy and safety. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the promotion of appropriate health technology has achieved good effects. The satisfaction of medical institutions, managers, health service staff and patient is high, but these research results are of poor quality, mostly subjective evaluation, lack of scientific, rational, objective and consistent evaluation criteria, which cannot be used as evaluation evidence for the promotion of appropriate health technology.
ObjectiveTo systematically summarize and analysis the patterns of the screening, organization and promotion of appropriate health technology, to provide references for establishing the localization and long-term mechanism of appropriate health technology promotion for different regions. MethodsDatabases including CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched from their inception to February 2016, to collect studies about the promotion and application of appropriate health technology in China. Two reviewers independently screened literature, and extracted data. Then, a descriptive analysis was conducted. ResultsA total of 26 studies were included, of which, 21 studies were related to specific patterns of the appropriate health technologies promotion and 5 studies were related to indicators screening system. The screening principle of appropriate health technology was a reference to national screening recommendation technology with local optional technology, taking into account locals needs and four aspects of technology:safety, effectiveness, economy and suitability. At the provincial and county levels, a leading group and a technical experts' group were established to take responsibility for project coordination and management, and provide technical guidance. Two patterns were being formed, one is a three or four level vertical promotion network, such as from the county to the townships and villages, the other is a radiation promotion from the point to the surface revolving around county and township. ConclusionThe screening of appropriate health technology is lack of objectivity, unified and strong operability index system. The "top-down" model led by the government could not meet the reality requirement of grassroots. It is necessary to establish a "bottom-up" mechanisms for the screening, organization and promotion of appropriate health technology, which can meet the reality requirement of grassroots.
ObjectiveTo investigate the current status of the promotion of appropriate health technologies in Zhejiang province from 2009 to 2013, in order to provide baseline data for appropriate health technologies, application and research. MethodsThe status of promotion of appropriate health technologies in different regions of Zhejiang province were quantitatively described and compared according to the information in the websites of The Application and Promotion of Appropriate Techniques of Health, The Application and Promotion of Appropriate Techniques of Traditional Chinese Medicine as well as the Bank of Appropriate Technologies. Resultsa) A total of 127 Model Bases of Appropriate Health Technologies were set up, which were combined 127 leading institutions and 513 joint units, covering 11 cities, 40 counties, and 206 townships. b) The type of first aid base and chronic diseases base accounted for 33.0% and 25.3% of total types of model bases respectively; however, the number of bases dealing with rehabilitation care, public health and diseases referred to Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology and skin disease were very small. c) There were 486 appropriate health technologies promoted in Zhejiang province; appropriate technology about first aid, chronic diseases, women and children, rehabilitation care, public health, Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology and skin disease, traditional Chinese medicine and family planning accounted for 26.5%, 18.9%, 17.9%, 11.0%, 10.6%, 7.6%, 4.6% and 1.4%, respectively of total types of appropriate health technologies. d) The numbers of appropriate health technologies promoted in different regions were varied. Most of appropriate health technologies were promoted in more developed regions or more regions rich in health resources. Conclusiona) The model of "1+X" is used to promote the application of appropriate health technologies in Zhejiang province, and the prefecture-level regions of Zhejiang province have established the Model Bases of Appropriate Health Technologies in 11 cities. The promotion system of appropriate health technology is constructed and it achieves good results. b) In nine model bases, the most types of promotion bases are chronic diseases and first aid, and the technologies about first aid, chronic diseases, women and children are most promoted. c) The types of appropriate health technologies promoted in different areas are varied. d) It is necessary to evaluate and select appropriate health technology bases according to the burden of local disease and evidence.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of evidence-based nursing course in undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking ability. MethodsA prospective cohort study design was performed in students from two nursing undergraduate classes, who elected evidence-based nursing course as an observation group and students lacked of the course as a control group. The Chinese Version of Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI-CV) was used to test critical thinking ability at the beginning and the end of the semester. The scores of CTDI-CV and rank of scores were compared between the two groups using t test and rank sum test. ResultsA total of 88 students were included, of which 41 students were in the observation group and 47 students were in the control group. Compared to the control group, the observation group demonstrated significantly more improvement in the total scores (MD=22.29, 95%CI 13.477 to 31.114), the search for truth (MD=2.81, 95%CI 0.211 to 5.410), open-minded (MD=3.37, 95%CI 1.280 to 5.471), analysis capabilities (MD=3.41, 95%CI 1.351 to 5.481), systematicity (MD=3.39, 95%CI 1.447 to 5.336), confidence critical thinking (MD=2.83, 95%CI 0.512 to 5.152), curiosity (MD=4.53, 95%CI 2.273 to 6.786) and cognitive maturity (MD=1.93, 95%CI -0.502 to 4.377). The level of total scores, the search for truth, analysis capabilities, systematicty, confidence critical thinking, and curiosity in the observation group were significantly improved. ConclusionEvidence-based nursing course learning can improve the undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking skill.