To standardize and improve the quality of reporting of patient and public involvement in health and social care research, BMJ recently published the 2nd edition of Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP 2). This paper introduces the background and process of GRIPP 2 development, and explains the core content of GRIPP 2. It is expected that GRIPP 2 will provide reference for domestic researchers carrying out patients and public involvement (PPI) research and writing PPI research report.
This paper introduces the concept, characteristics, similar concepts, system of knowledge, theoretic model and typical example of improvement science in health care sector, and analyzes a project of quality improvement in order to demonstrate the practical implication. It attempts to provide evidence and reference for future relative studies.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise and rehabilitation program in improving shoulder function and quality of life for breast cancer patients after mastectomy. Method We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE (1966 to 2008), EMbase (1989 to 2007), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature), CBMdisc (1978 to 2008), and CNKI (1994 to 2008) to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality of RCTs was critically appraised and data were extracted by 3 reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted for the eligible RCTs. Result Nineteen RCTs were included. Stepwise upper extremity exercise and body exercise were reported in the rehabilitation program. Nine studies indicated that the rehabilitation program significantly improved the shoulder function of breast cancer patients after mastectomy. Four studies demonstrated its effect on cardiopulmonary function and body endurance. Six RCTs proved the effect of rehabilitation program on health-related quality of life and fatigue alleviation. Conclusion Rehabilitation program consisting of stepwise upper extremity exercise and full-body exercise is effective in improving the shoulder function and enhancing the quality of life of breast cancer patients after mastectomy. It also has a positive effect in reducing fatigue for those undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
The first Global Evidence Summit (GES) was held in Cape Town in South Africa from September 13th to November 16th, 2017. This paper interprets the construction of digital and trustworthy evidence ecosystem which was proposed to be established by the GES.
Objective This study was to develop a framework of evidence-based continuous quality improvement and provide a framework for nursing professionals to promote evidence transfer and clinical nursing quality improvement. Methods Guided by the principles of PDCA, evidence-based nursing and work process, a framework of evidence-based quality continuous improvement was established through a citation analysis of evidence implementation related projects and literatures. Results The framework of evidence-based continuous quality improvement consisted of four stages and twelve steps, including evidence searching, practice audit, evidence implementation and outcome evaluation, and then it would turn to next cycle. Conclusion The framework of evidence-based continuous quality improvement provides nursing professionals a concept and method of promoting evidence into practice and promoting clinical nursing quality improvement.
To standardize and improve the reporting quality of implementation studies, BMJ published the standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI). This paper introduces the background and process of StaRI development, and interprets the core content of StaRI. It is expected that StaRI will provide support for domestic researchers to carry out implementation studies and writing implementation research reports.
This paper introduces the background, significance, definition and types of clinical audit and describes five stages of clinical audit, including preparing for clinical audit, selecting criteria, measuring performance and sustaining improvement. This paper also introduces the international and national status quo of implementing clinical audit in nursing practice and describes the reporting guideline for articles of clinical audit. Finally, this article suggests that providing methodological training and creating a supportive environment are crucial strategies to promote the implementation of clinical audit and bridge the gaps between evidence and practice.
Objectives To establish the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China. Methods Two focus groups’ interviews for 26 clinical nursing experts and methodological experts from China were adopted to build the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines. Results The quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China covered 5 domains and 15 items, which included scientificity/rigor, effectiveness/safety, economy, availability/feasibility, and conflict of interest. All items were from 0 to 5 scale and weighted 0.5 to 2 based on their contributions to the quality of guidelines. Conclusions The quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines adopt the same framework with the quality criteria of guidelines in medical field and also integrate features of nursing. It provides the quality standard for Chinese clinical nursing practice guidelines.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines.MethodsFive appraisers were included to assess two clinical nursing practice guidelines using the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines and AGREE Ⅱ. ICC and coefficient of consistency were adopted to assess the reliability and validity of the appraisal tools.ResultsICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines were 0.979 and 0.890. ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by AGREE Ⅱ were 0.957 and 0.887. The coefficient of consistency for guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the two appraisal tools were 0.880 and 0.886, both were highly consistent.ConclusionsThe quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines has good reliability and validity and can be used as appraisal tool for quality evaluation of clinical nursing practice guidelines. It is strongly recommended that the users should understand the appraisal tool or should be trained to decrease the bias.
The COSMIN-RoB checklist includes three sections with a total of 10 boxes, which is used to evaluate risk of bias of studies on content validity, internal structure, and other measurement properties. COSMIN classifies reliability, measurement error, criteria validity, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness as other measurement properties, which primarily focus on the quality of the (sub)scale as a whole, rather than on the item level. Among the five measurement properties, reliability, measurement error and criteria validity are the most widely used in the studies. Therefore, this paper aims to interpret COSMIN-RoB checklist with examples to guide researchers to evaluate the risk of bias of the studies on reliability, measurement error and criteria validity of PROMs.