Objective To systematically review the effectiveness of forced air warming for the maintenance of perioperative core temperature, so as to provide clinical evidence for an appropriate warming plan during the perioperative period. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM and CNKI from 2000 to 2012, so as to comprehensively collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effectiveness of different warming methods for the maintenance of perioperative core temperature (including forced air warming, resistive-heating blanket/electric heating pad, circulating water mattress, and infrared ray radiant heating system) for maintenance of perioperative core temperature. References of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Eleven RCTs involving 577 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, in the maintenance of core temperature during the perioperative period, forced air warming was superior to resistive-heating blanket/electric heating pad (SMD= –0.40, 95%CI –0.73 to –0.06), circulating water mattress (SMD= –1.10, 95%CI –1.55 to –0.66), and infrared ray radiant heating system (SMD= –0.69, 95%CI –1.06 to –0.32). In the incidence of hypothermia during the perioperative period, the group of forced air warming was lower than the group of blanket/electric heating pad (RR=1.76, 95%CI 1.15 to 2.69), but it was the same as the group of infrared ray radiant heating system (RR=1.37, 95%CI 0.83 to 2.27). In the incidence of shivering during the perioperative period, the group of forced air warming was the same as the group of blanket/electric heating pad (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.18 to 3.21) and the group of infrared ray radiant heating system (RR=0.8, 95%CI 0.19 to 3.36). Conclusion Compared with resistive-heating blanket/electric heating pad, circulating water mattress, and infrared ray radiant heating system, forced air warming maintains patients’ core temperature better during the perioperative period, with a lower incidences of hypothermia. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality RCTs with large sample size are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) on treating sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). MethodsForty-two patients with SOD according to Rome Ⅱ diagnostic criteria were retrospectively summarized. Bile duct residual stone, tumor or biliopancreatic duct obstruction diseases were excluded by B ultrasound, CT, and MRCP examination. Total 42 patients underwent EST. ResultsEST was done successfully in 42 cases, success rate was 100%. Postoperative acute pancreatitis occurred in 5 patients (11.90%), which were cured by 3－7 d conservative treatment. There were no complications of severe acute pancreatitis, digestive tract perforation, hemorrhage, and cholangitis. Follow-up 12-45 months (mean 23.8 months), symptoms of abdominal pain in all cases were improved or relieved, the effective rate was 100%. There were 2 cases treated conservatively because of hyperlipemic pancreatitis. ConclusionEST has become the primary treatment procedure for SOD because of definite outcome, less suffering, safety, less complications, and reproducibility, which are concordant with the requirements of minimally invasive surgery.