The QUADAS-2, QUIPS, and PROBAST tools are not specific for prognostic accuracy studies and the use of these tools to assess the risk of bias in prognostic accuracy studies is prone to bias. Therefore, QUAPAS, a risk of bias assessment tool for prognostic accuracy studies, has recently been developed. The tool combines QUADAS-2, QUIPS, and PROBAST, and consists of 5 domains, 18 signaling questions, 5 risk of bias questions, and 4 applicability questions. This paper will introduce the content and usage of QUAPAS to provide inspiration and references for domestic researchers.
Currently, the medical imaging methods based on artificial intelligence are developing rapidly, and the related literature reports are increasing year by year. However, there is no special reporting standard, and the reporting of the results is not standardized. In order to improve the report quality of this kind of research and help readers and evaluators evaluate the quality of this kind of research more scientifically, a checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM) was put forward abroad. This paper introduces the content of CLAIM and explains its items.
As precision medicine continues to gain momentum, the number of predictive model studies is increasing. However, the quality of the methodology and reporting varies greatly, which limits the promotion and application of these models in clinical practice. Systematic reviews of prediction models draw conclusions by summarizing and evaluating the performance of such models in different settings and populations, thus promoting their application in practice. Although the number of systematic reviews of predictive model studies has increased in recent years, the methods used are still not standardized and the quality varies greatly. In this paper, we combine the latest advances in methodologies both domestically and abroad, and summarize the production methods and processes of a systematic review of prediction models. The aim of this study is to provide references for domestic scholars to produce systematic reviews of prediction models.
The use of clinical predictive modeling to guide clinical decision-making and thus provide accurate diagnosis and treatment services for patients has become a clinical consensus and trend. However, the models available for clinical use are more limited due to unstandardised research methods and poor quality of evidence. This paper introduces the development process of clinical prediction models from six aspects, data collection, model development, performance evaluation, model validation, model presentation and model updating, as well as the clinical prediction model research report statement and risk of bias assessment tools in order to provide methodological references for domestic researchers.