Abstract: Objective To summarize the experiences of treatment for prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), paying special emphasis on some interrelated conceptions of PVE, its microbiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Methods From September 1979 to September 2009, 33 patients diagnosed to have PVE were treated in our department. There were 17 males and 16 females. Their age ranged from 19 to 57 years old with an average age of 34 years. The incidence of PVE was 1.48% （33/2 236）including 1.03%（16/1 551）, 3.00%（7/233）, 2.28%（10/438）, and 0% of PVE in mitral valve replacement (MVR), aortic valve replacement (AVR), double valve replacement (DVR), tricuspid valve replacement (TVR), respectively. Pure medical treatment (Penicillin or Vancomycin with other broadspectrum antibiotics, Fluconazole and Amphotericin) was performed on 22 patients. Combined medical and surgical treatment was performed in 11 patients. The patients underwent operation after adequate antibiotics treatment and general condition improvement. The infective tissue and vegetation were completely debrided after the infective prosthetic valve was removed. Before the new valve was transplanted, paravalvular tissue was cleaned with antibiotics, iodine solution and normal saline. Results Hospital death occurred in 19 patients (86.36%) and only 3 patients (13.64%) recovered in the group with pure medical treatment. The main reasons for death were infective shock and cardiac failure in 9 patients, and cerebral complications including embolism, bleeding and multipleorgan failure in 10 patients. For the group with combined medical and surgical treatment, 10 patients (90.91%) survived and only one patient (9.09%) died of multipleorgan failure. Follow-up was done in 13 patients for 6 months to 15 years averaging 41 months. During the follow-up, only one patient was reoperated because of the paravalvular leak eight year later. There was no PVE recurrence in all the rest patients. Conclusion Compared with pure medical treatment, combined medical and surgical treatment is a better solution for PVE.
ObjectiveTo explore the single-center experience of hybrid therapy in treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection, and to make a comparison of the clinical results of this hybrid therapy with total arch replacement surgery in the same period.MethodsFrom March 2017 to April 2020, 272 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent surgical treatment in our center, including 147 patients (126 males and 21 females) who received the aortic arch surgery. Among them, 106 patients underwent replacement of ascending aorta+aortic arch+stent trunk (total arch replacement group), while 41 patients underwent one-stop compound total arch type Ⅱ hybrid surgery (compound total arch replacement group). We tried to identify whether hybrid surgery really simplified total arch replacement surgery of the aortic dissection by comparing the operative mortality, postoperative complication rate, operative time, extracorporeal circulation time, etc.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in preoperative clinical data or death rate between the two groups. However, blood transfusion (6.74±7.35 U vs. 4.65±6.87 U, P<0.05), postoperative respiratory insufficiency [16 (15.09%) vs. 2 (4.88%), P<0.05], and apoplexy [3 (2.83%) vs. 0, P<0.05], paraplegia [2 (1.89%) vs. 0, P<0.05], in the compound total arch replacement group was significantly better than those of the total arch replacement group. The compound total arch replacement group did not shorten the total operation time, but it was significantly better in terms of extracorporeal circulation time (175.50±55.70 min vs. 129.70±48.80 min, P<0.05), aortic block time (103.10±23.70 min vs. 49.70±30.10 min, P<0.05), and the time of stopping the circulation or avoiding stopping the circulation (32.10±7.20 min vs. 0 min, P<0.05). The postoperative mechanical ventilation time was shorter in the compound total arch group (62.60±31.70 h vs. 41.30±32.60 h, P<0.05), and the time of staying in ICU (124.50±61.50 h vs. 63.40±71.20 h, P<0.05) and the postoperative hospital stay (13.50±11.20 d vs. 9.20±7.20 d, P<0.05) were significantly shorter than those in the total replacement group. A total of 138 patients were followed up for 6-38 (15.8±6.4) months. There was no statistical difference in one-year mortality or three-year mortality (P>0.05).ConclusionHybrid surgery shortens extracorporeal circulation time, while reduces or avoids the time of deep hypothermia circulatory arrest, the incidence of complications and the time of hospital stay. In conclusions, hybrid surgery simplifies the arch management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
Objective To investigate clinical outcomes and perioperative management of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting （OPCAB） for patients following acute myocardial infarction （AMI）.?Methods?From January 2006 to March 2010， 239 consecutive patients underwent OPCAB on the 14-27 （20.55±3.91） d following AMI（AMI group）in Renji Hospital，School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiaotong University. Preoperative MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase（CK-MB） level was （15.82±6.24） U/L and cardiac troponin I（cTnI） was （0.07±0.04） ng/ml. Clinical data of 406 patients without myocardial infarction history who underwent OPCAB during the same period were also collected as the control group for comparison.?Results?The 30-day mortality of AMI group was 2.51% （6/239）. The causes of death were circulatory failure in 4 patients， ischemic necrosis of lower extremity caused by intra-aortic balloon pump （IABP） in 1 patient and pneumonia with septic shock in 1 patient. Dopamine usage in AMI group was significantly higher than that of the control group （61.51% vs. 37.44%， P=0.001）. Intraoperative or postoperative IABP implantation was more common in AMI group， but there was no statistical difference between the two groups（P＞0.05） . Postoperative drainage and blood transfusion in AMI group were significantly larger than those of the control group （385.18±93.22 ml vs. 316.41±70.05 ml， P=0.022；373.68±69.54 ml vs. 289.78±43.33 ml， P=0.005， respectively）. But there was no statistical difference in re-exploration rate between the two groups （P＞0.05）. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation between the two groups （P＞0.05）. Incidence of acute kidneyinjury of AMI group was significantly higher than that of the control group （13.81% vs. 8.62%， P=0.038）. Postoperative 30-day mortality of AMI group was higher than that of the control group， but there was no statistical difference between the two groups （2.51% vs. 1.48%，P＞0.05）. There was no statistical difference in ICU stay time and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups （2.01±0.95 d vs. 1.78±0.98 d；10.33±4.16 d vs. 9.89±4.52 d， respectively， P＞0.05）. A total of 211 patients （88.28%）in AMI group were followed up for 2.89±1.02 years， and 28 patients （11.72%） were lost during follow-up. Twenty-five patients died during follow-up including 14 cardiac deaths. One-year survival rate was 97.63%， and five-year survival rate was 88.15%.?Conclusion?It’s comparatively safe to perform OPCAB for patients at 2-4 weeks following AMI when their CK-MB and cTnI levels have returned to normal range.
ObjectiveTo describe our experiences of application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (OPCABG) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with dilated left ventricle.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 303 patients with dilated left ventricle [left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)> 60 mm] who underwent OPCABG from January 2008 to December 2018 at a single center was conducted. There were 205 males and 98 females at age of 45-87 (66.9±9.3) years.ResultsThe mean pulmonary artery pressure in 90 patients was more than 25 mm Hg. Sixteen patients underwent OPCABG with emergent transition of extracorporeal circulation (CPB). Twenty-one patients underwent OPCABG with CPB at the beginning of CABG. Thirty-five patients underwent intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP). Four patients died during in-hospital time with the experience of emergent transition of CPB. Six months after operation, LVEDD and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were improved.ConclusionOPCABG is a safe and effective alternative for CAD patients with dilated left ventricle. However, for patients with higher pulmonary pressure and a spherical left ventricle after cardiac reshaping, there is a high risk of emergent transition of CPB during OPCABG; for this kind of patients, it is necessary to start CPB at the beginning of OPCABG.
ObjectiveTo analyze the safety and follow-up results of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of multivessel diseases via left anterolateral minithoracotomy.MethodsFrom January 2018 to March 2020, a total of 30 patients including 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 61.3±7.5 years having multivessel coronary heart diseases were treated in our hospital with on-pump CABG via left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Among them, 14 patients had three-vessel diseases and 16 patients had two-vessel diseases.ResultsThere were 29 internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending bypass grafts harvested in total while the rest were saphenous-vein bypass grafts. The average number of bypass vessels was 2.3±0.5. There was no perioperative death in the whole group, one patient underwent rethoracotomy due to hemorrhage, and one patient suffered acute renal insufficiency. The average time of postoperative tracheal intubation was 16.0±5.8 hours, and the postoperative ICU stay was 30.1±11.5 hours. Twenty five patients were followed up, including coronary CT angiography examinations at 6 months and 1 year after operation. Proximal anastomotic stenosis in one patient and distal anastomosis occlusion in one patient occurred.ConclusionOn-pump CABG via left anterolateral minithoracotomy is safe for appropriately selected patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the perioperative, short- and mid-term results of total artery bypass grafting and saphenous vein bypass grafting in three-vessel coronary heart disease patients complicated with diabetes.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on 46 patients (a TAR group) including 36 males and 10 females with an average age of 65.1±11.3 years who underwent total artery bypass grafting in Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical College from 2005 to 2014. A total of 46 patients with age and gender matched admitted during the same period were selected as a control group (NCR group), in which left internal mammary artery and great saphenous vein were used as grafting vessels. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative (1 year and 5 years) data of the two groups were analyzed.ResultsIn terms of perioperative data, the TAR group was inferior to the NCR group in operation time, postoperative 24 h drainage volume and postoperative 24 h blood transfusion volume. However, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of perioperative mortality, ICU stay, etc. One year after surgery, there was no difference in angina pectoris recurrence, recurrent myocardial infarction or grafting vessel patency rate between the two groups. Five years after the operation, the TAR group was superior to the NCR group in angina recurrence, myocardial infarction, and grafting vessels patency rate.ConclusionFor patients with three-vessel coronary heart disease complicated with diabetes, total arterial bypass grafting can achieve better mid-term effect, although it can prolong the operation time and increase the amount of drainage and blood transfusion 24 h after operation.