Objective To summarize the research progress of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in treating partial thickness cartilage loss (PTCL) in the medial compartment of the knee joint, aiming to further clarify the indications and optimize the effectiveness of Oxford UKA. MethodsA comprehensive review of recent domestic and international literature on Oxford UKA for PTCL in the medial compartment of the knee joint was conducted to summarize its application and research advancements. ResultsBased on current researches, the main indication for Oxford UKA is full thinckness cartilage loss in the medial compartment of the knee joint. Although it has shown certain effectiveness in treating PTCL in the medial compartment of the knee joint, there are also reports of opposite conclusions. Therefore, there is still controversy over whether Oxford UKA can be chosen for PTCL, and the large-sample and multi-center studies are needed to further clarify the controversy. Studies indicate that accurate preoperative assessment of cartilage damage severity is crucial for selecting appropriate candidates for Oxford UKA to optimize postoperative effectiveness. ConclusionOxford UKA may represent an effective treatment for patients with PTCL in the medial compartment of the knee joint. However, strict patient selection and precise preoperative evaluation are essential to ensure surgical success and long-term effectiveness.
Objective To construct a nomogram model for predicting delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning (DEACMP) in emergency departments. Methods All patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning who visited the Department of Emergency of Zigong Fourth People’s Hospital between June 1st, 2011 and May 31st, 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set and a testing set in a 6∶4 ratio. LASSO regression was used to screen variables in the training set to establish a nomogram model for predicting DEACMP. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical practicality were compared between the nomogram and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in the training and testing sets. Results A total of 475 patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning were included, of whom 41 patients had DEACMP. Age, GCS and aspartate aminotransferase were selected as risk factors through LASSO regression, and a nomogram model was constructed based on these factors. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for nomogram and GCS to predict DEACMP in the training set were 0.897 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.829, 0.966)] and 0.877 [95%CI (0.797, 0.957)], respectively; and those for nomogram and GCS to predict DEACMP in the testing set were 0.925 [95%CI (0.865, 0.985)] and 0.858 [95%CI (0.752, 0.965)], respectively. Compared with GCS, the performance of nomogram in the training set (net reclassification index=0.495, P=0.014; integrated discrimination improvement=0.070, P=0.011) and testing set (net reclassification index=0.721, P=0.004; integrated discrimination improvement=0.138, P=0.009) were both positively improved. The calibration of nomogram in the training set and testing set was higher than that of GCS. The decision curves in the training set and testing set showed that the nomogram had better clinical net benefits than GCS. Conclusion The age, GCS and aspartate aminotransferase are risk factors for DEACMP, and the nomogram model established based on these factors has better discrimination, calibration, and clinical practicality compared to GCS.
Objective To explore the predictive value of Composite Congestion Score (CCS) in predicting adverse events within 180 days in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency intensive care unit (EICU). Methods The patients with AHF who were admitted to EICU of Zigong Fourth People’s Hospital between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 were included consecutively. The patients were followed up for 180 days, and were divided into poor prognosis group and good prognosis group according to whether there were adverse events. Logistic regression equation was used to screen independent risk factors for predicting adverse events in patients with AHF within 180 days after leaving EICU. To compare the discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of independent risk factors at EICU discharge and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Assessment SystemⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score at EICU admission to predict the occurrence of adverse events of AHF. Results A total of 71 patients were included, including 32 patients with good prognosis and 39 patients with poor prognosis. Except for age, APACHEⅡscore at EICU admission and CCS score at EICU discharge (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in other indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that CCS score at EICU discharge [odds ratio (OR)=2.806, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.428, 5.512), P=0.003], age [OR=1.086, 95%CI (1.017, 1.159), P=0.013] were independent risk factors for predicting death or returning to hospital within 180 days. Among them, the CCS score at EICU discharge combining with age had a positive improvement ability compared with the CCS score at EICU discharge, the age, and the APACHE Ⅱ score at EICU admission. The calibration curves of the four scoring methods for predicting adverse events within 180 days showed that the CCS score at EICU discharge had the highest calibration and the calibration of age was the lowest. The decision curve showed that the clinical usefulness of age, the CCS score at EICU discharge and the CCS score at EICU discharge combining with age was better than the APACHE Ⅱ score at EICU admission. Conclusions The CCS score of patients with AHF at EICU discharge is closely related to adverse events within 180 days. The CCS score is designed based on clinical variables, simple and practical. The combination of age and the CCS score at EICU discharge will further enhance its clinical application value.
Objective To compare the early analgesic effects and the impact on knee joint function recovery after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) between single adductor canal block (SACB) and continuous adductor canal block (CACB) combined with local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) using a prospective study. Methods The patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted between April 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled as a subject. Among them, 60 patients met the selection criteria and were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the SACB group or CACB group in a ratio of 1:1 using a random number table method. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in terms of age, gender, height, body mass, body mass index, affected side, and preoperative resting visual analogue scale (VAS) score and active VAS score, Oxford knee score (OKS), and American Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) score. All patients received multimodal analgesia management using LIA combined with SACB or CACB. The operation time, pain related indicators (resting and activity VAS scores, number and timing of breakthrough pain, opioid consumption), joint function related indicators (quadriceps muscle strength, knee range of motion, OKS score, and HSS score), as well as postoperative block complications and adverse events were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (P<0.05). All patients in the two groups were followed up with a follow-up time of (9.70±4.93) months in the SACB group and (12.23±5.05) months in the CACB group, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The CACB group had a significant lower resting VAS score at 24 hours after operation compared to the SACB group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in resting and active VAS scores between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). The CACB group had a significantly lower incidence of breakthrough pain compared to the SACB group [9 cases (30.00%) vs. 17 cases (56.67%); P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the timing of breakthrough pain occurrence and opioid consumption between the two groups (P>0.05). Four cases in the SACB group and 7 cases in the CACB group experienced adverse events, with no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05). The CACB group had significantly better knee joint mobility than the SACB group at 1 and 2 days after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in knee joint mobility on 0 day after operation and quadriceps muscle strength and OKS and HSS scores at different time points (P>0.05). Conclusion In UKA, the analgesic effects and knee joint function recovery are similar when compared between LIA combined with SACB and LIA combined with CACB. However, SACB is simpler to perform and can avoid adverse events such as catheter displacement and dislocation. Therefore, SACB may be a better choice.