ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of femoral neck system (FNS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients. Methods The literature on FNS at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the results of mechanical and clinical studies on FNS were summarized based on clinical experience. Results FNS has good mechanical stability, which can reduce complications such as femoral neck shortening, internal fixation failure, and varus caused by mechanical instability. At present, FNS is mainly selected for comparison with cannulated compression screws and dynamic hip screws in clinical research. The results show that FNS has the advantages of minimally invasive, short operation time, less intraoperative fluoroscopy, earlier postoperative weight-bearing and fracture healing, and better hip function recovery. Conclusion As a new internal fixator, FNS has achieved satisfactory results in the current research. FNS has good mechanical advantages, which is beneficial to fracture healing and the recovery of hip joint function after operation. However, whether FNS can reduce the incidence of nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head remains to be further clarified.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after treatment of femoral neck fractures with femoral neck system (FNS). MethodsBetween January 2020 and February 2021, 179 patients (182 hips) with femoral neck fractures treated by FNS fixation were selected for retrospective analysis. There were 96 males and 83 females with an average age of 53.7 years (range, 20-59 years). There were 106 cases of low-energy-induced injury and 73 cases of high-energy-induced injury. The fractures were classified as type Ⅱ in 40 hips, type Ⅲ in 78 hips, and type Ⅳ in 64 hips according to Garden classification standard, and as typeⅠin 23 hips, type Ⅱ in 66 hips, and type Ⅲ in 93 hips according to Pauwels classification standard. There were 21 patients with diabetes. Patients were divided into ONFH group and non-ONFH group according to whether ONFH occurred at last follow-up. The data of the patients were collected, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), trauma mechanism, bone mineral density, having diabetes or not, Garden classification and Pauwels classification of fractures, fracture reduction quality, femoral head retroversion angle, and removal of internal fixator or not. The above factors were analyzed by univariate analysis, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors. Results Total 179 patients (182 hips) were followed up 20-34 months (mean, 26.5 months). Of these, 30 cases (30 hips) developed ONFH at 9-30 months after operation (ONFH group), and the incidence of ONFH was 16.48%. And 149 cases (152 hips) had no ONFH at last follow-up (non-ONFH group). The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between groups in bone mineral density, having diabetes or not, Garden classification, femoral head retroversion angle, and fracture reduction quality (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the Garden type Ⅳ fracture, reduction quality of grading Ⅲ, femoral head retroversion angle >15°, complicated with diabetes were the risk factors for ONFH after FNS fixation (P<0.05). ConclusionFor the patients with Garden type Ⅳ fracture, poor quality of fracture reduction, femoral head retroversion angle >15°, and diabetes, the risk of ONFH after FNS fixation increases.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and accuracy of manual and robot-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 58 cases of lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis treated by CBT screw fixation between February 2017 and February 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 29 cases were fixed with CBT screws assisted by robot (group A), 29 cases were fixed with CBT screws by hand (group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index, lesion type, T-value of bone mineral density, and operative segment (P>0.05), with comparability. The accuracy of implant was evaluated by Kaito’s grading method, and the invasion of CBT screw to the superior articular process was evaluated by Babu’s method.ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss in group A were significantly less than those in group B (t=−8.921, P=0.000; t=−14.101, P=0.000). One hundred and sixteen CBT screws were implanted in the two groups. At 3 days after operation, according to the Kaito’s grading method, the accuracy of implant in group A was 108 screws of grade 0, 6 of grade 1, and 2 of grade 2; and in group B was 86 screws of grade 0, 12 of grade 1, and 18 of grade 2; the difference was significant (Z=4.007, P=0.000). There were 114 accepted screws (98.3%) in group A and 98 (84.5%) in group B, the difference was significant (χ2=8.309, P=0.009). At 3 days after operation, according to Babu’s method, there were 85 screws in grade 0, 3 in grade 1, and 2 in grade 2 in group A; and in group B, there were 91 screws in grade 0, 16 in grade 1, 5 in grade 2, and 4 in grade 3; the difference was significant (Z=7.943, P=0.000). No serious injury of spinal cord, nerve, and blood vessel was found in the two groups. One patient in group A had delayed cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and 2 patients in group B had mild anemia. Both groups were followed up 10-14 months (mean, 11.6 months). The neurological symptoms were improved, and no screw loosening or fracture was found during the follow-up.ConclusionCompared with manual implantation of CBT screw, robot-assisted spinal implant has higher accuracy, lower incidence of invasion of superior articular process, and strong holding power of CBT screw, which can be applied to the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis.
Objective To investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the short-term effectiveness of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in the treatment of varus knee arthritis. Methods The clinical data of 84 patients (84 knees) with varus knee arthritis treated with HTO between May 2016 and August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to BMI, the patients were divided into normal group (32 patients in group A, BMI<25 kg/m2), overweight group (27 patients in group B, BMI>30 kg/m2), and obese group (25 patients in group C, BMI>30 kg/m2). The BMI of groups A, B, and C were (23.35±0.89), (26.65±1.03), and (32.05±1.47) kg/m2, respectively. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in gender, age, surgical side, disease duration, and preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, knee range of motion, and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) between groups. The operation time, intraoperative dominant blood loss, and the decrease of hemoglobin on the 3rd day after operation were recorded and compared between groups. The improvement of knee joint function and pain status were evaluated by knee joint HSS score, knee range of motion, and VAS score before and after operation, and measuring the HKA of patients on X-ray film. During the follow-up, the X-ray films of the knee joint were reexamined to observe the position of the internal fixator and the healing of osteotomy. Results All patients completed the operation successfully and were followed up 8-40 months (mean, 19.3 months). There was no significant difference in follow-up time, operation time, intraoperative dominant blood loss, and the decrease of hemoglobin on the 3rd day after operation between groups (P>0.05). No operative complications such as severe vascular or nerve injury occurred. After operation, deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities occurred in 1 case in groups A and B respectively, and fat liquefaction of surgical incision occurred in 2 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between groups (3.1% vs. 3.7% vs. 8.0%) (P=0.689). During the follow-up, there was no bone nonunion, plate fracture or loosening. At last follow-up, HSS score, VAS score, knee range of motion, and HKA significantly improved in the 3 groups when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the differences of the above indexes between groups before and after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion BMI does not affect the short-term effectiveness of HTO in the treatment of varus knee arthritis. HTO can be selected for overweight and obese patients after standard medical treatment is ineffective.