Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of furazolidone-based first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of furazolidone-based first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection were identified from Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), PubMed (1992 to January 2009), OVID (1994 to January 2009), Wanfang Data (1994 to January 2009), CNKI (1994 to January 2009), and VIP Data (1994 to January 2009). The quality of included RCTs was assessed, and the meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan5.0 software. Results Among five included RCTs involving 499 patients, four were graded as B in methodology quality and the left one was graded as C. As to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the Helicobacter pylori eradication rate was 78.3% in furazolidone group and 66.8% in control group (RR=1.18, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.62), while the Per Protocol (PP) analysis, the eradication rate of furazolidone group and control group was 83.1% and 70.9% respectively (RR=1.17, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.57). The incidence rate of mild side-effects was 40.8% in furazolidone group and 39.4% in control group (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.36), and while that of severe side-effects in furazolidone group and control group was 7.8% and 3.7% respectively (RR=1.86, 95%CI 0.84 to 4.09). Conclusions With similar efficacy and safety as control group has, the furazolidone-based therapy could be recommended as a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. The high-quality RCTs with large sample are required to prove the above conclusion for the limitation of quantity and quality of included studies.
ObjectiveTo compare the in-hospital outcomes of transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR) for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. MethodsPatients (including BAV and TAV patients) who underwent TA-TAVR with the J-ValveTM in West China Hospital from July 2014 to July 2020 were included consecutively. The clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed. ResultsA total of 354 patients were included in the study, 75 in the BAV group and 279 in the TAV group. There were 229 males and 125 females with a mean age of 72.2±6.0 years. No death occurred during the procedure, and the overall technical success rate was 97.7%. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate was 1.4%. Twenty (26.7%) patients with BAV and 46 (16.5%) patients with TAV had mild or higher perivalvular leaks immediately after the procedure. No patients with BAV required permanent pacemaker implantation postoperatively, while 13 (4.7%) TAV patients required permanent pacemaker implantation, with an overall pacemaker implantation rate of 3.7%. One (1.3%) BAV patient and 7 (2.5%) TAV patients developed acute kidney injury postoperatively. One (1.3%) BAV patient and 1 (0.4%) TAV patient developed perioperative myocardial infarction. The average postoperative hospital stay was 7.6±3.6 d for BAV patients and 8.6±6.1 d for TAV patients. There was no statistical difference in primary or secondary in-hospital outcomes between BAV and TAV patients (P>0.05). ConclusionCompared to TAV patients, BAV patients have similar in-hospital outcomes, with a low incidence of adverse clinical outcomes, which provides preliminary evidence for its implementation in Chinese patients with a high proportion of BAV.