Objective To estimate healthy life expectancy of residents aged 30 and above in Jianyang, Sichuan province, and comprehensively evaluate the health status of the population, so as to provide reference and basis for the formulation of health-related public policies. Methods The population data, death data and health status data of Jianyang city in 2018 were collected, and the self-rated health life expectancy and life expectancy without chronic diseases of residents aged 30 and above were calculated by Sullivan method, and their proportion in life expectancy was calculated. Results A total of 4 482 residents aged 30 years and above were included in Jinyang city, of whom 3 989 were self-rated healthy, accounting for 89.00% of self-rated health, and 1 988 were suffering from chronic diseases, with a chronic disease prevalence rate of 44.36%. In the age group of 30-64, the self-rated health life expectancy of women was significantly higher than that of men (P<0.05), and in the age group of 40-44, the life expectancy without chronic diseases of women was significantly lower than that of men (P<0.05), and the differences were not statistically significant when comparing different genders in other age groups (P>0.05). With the increase of age, the proportion of residents’ self-rated health and the proportion of life expectancy without chronic diseases in healthy life expectancy gradually declined. Conclusions The chronic disease has become the main factor affecting the health of middle-aged and elderly population, especially female population. It is suggested that active measures should be taken to deal with chronic diseases and the elderly health support system should be strengthened to improve healthy life expectancy of residents in Jianyang city.
Objective To summarize and categorize the epidemiological evaluation indicators of disease burden, and to explore and analyze the research gaps in the existing evaluation indicators of disease burden. Methods The CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched by computer to obtain qualitative studies on evaluation indicators of disease burden. The search time limit was from the establishment of the database to October 2023. CASP was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies, and thematic analysis was used to summarize the evaluation indicators of disease burden by NVivo 12 software. Results A total of 19 studies were included, of which 10 studies were of high quality and 9 studies were of medium quality. The evaluation indicators of disease burden were summarized into two three-level core themes: positive indicators and negative indicators. Five second-level analytic themes were used: disease indicators, life loss indicators, life expectancy indicators, cause removal indicators and health status indicators. Twenty-nine level-1 descriptive themes. Conclusion The evaluation indicators of disease burden have their respective scopes of application and limitations. It is necessary to continue strengthening the construction of a comprehensive evaluation index system for disease burden, so that it is comparable and reliable, can adapt to local calculation weights, and covers both family burden and social burden.