Objective To compare the hemostatic effects and tourniquet induced side reactions of 2 different tourniquets in internal fixation of bilateral tibia and fibula fracture. Methods Between May 2008 and May 2010, 21 patients with bilateral tibia and fibula fracture were treated and randomly divided into 2 groups according to left and right l imbs. When steel plate fixation was performed, equil ibrium pressure pneumatic tourniquet (EPPT group) and common tourniquet (common group) were used to staunch the flow of blood respectively. The time of using tourniquet was 60 minutes, and the hemostatic pressure was 50 kPa. There were 12 males and 9 females with an age range of 17 to 58 years (mean, 32.5 years). Injurywas caused by traffic accident in 9 patients, by heavy pound in 6 patients, and fall ing from height in 6 patients. According to X-ray calssification, there were 15 cases of simple type, 3 cases of butterfly type, and 3 cases of comminuted type in EPPT group; there were 13 cases of simple type, 5 cases of butterfly type, and 3 cases of comminuted type in common group. The time from injury to operation was 3 to 72 hours (mean, 37.5 hours). Results The time of using tourniquet was (95.30 ± 4.19) minutes in EPPT group and (94.11 ± 5.16) minutes in common group, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). All the incision of 2 groups healed by first intension. After 2 weeks of operation in common group, peroneal nerve injury occurred in 3 cases, and was cured by supporting nerve for 3 months; bl ister occurred in 1 case and was cured after dressing change for 3 weeks; and the injury rate was 19%. No compl ication occurred in EPPT group with an injury rate of 0. There was significant difference in the injury rate between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). The hemostatic effects were excellent in 19 cases and good in 2 cases of EPPT group, were excellent in 10 cases, good in 3 cases, and poor in 8 cases of common group; the excellent and good rate were 100% and 61.9% respectively, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 3-24 months. Fracture healed without nonunion and deformity union in 2 groups. Conclusion Comparing to common tourniquet, the EPPT can provide good bloodless field, lower hemostatic pressure, and less tourniquet compl ication.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the hemostatic effect of traditional Class Ⅲ hemostatic powder and aggregate absorbable hemostat in surgeries. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect controlled studies related to the objects from inception to September 18th, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 7 randomized controlled trials, 5 cohort studies and 9 animal experiments were included. The results of analysis showed that the group with traditional Class Ⅲ hemostatic powder or aggregate absorbable hemostat had a higher hemostatic success rate and shorter hemostatic time than those with no hemostatic material in animal surgeries. And the group with aggregate absorbable hemostat had a higher 10min hemostatic success rate than those with traditional hemostatic measures. The application of traditional Class Ⅲ hemostatic powder in human cardiothoracic surgeries shortened the hemostatic time and reduced drainage after surgeries, but caused more blood loss during knee arthroplasties. Aggregate absorbable hemostat caused less blood loss than traditional hemostatic measures in human hip arthroplasties, and the 5min and 10min success rates of aggregate absorbable hemostat group were not worse than those of hemostatic gauze. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the hemostatic effect of both traditional Class Ⅲ hemostatic powder and aggregate absorbable hemostat are better than that of no hemostatic material in animal and human surgery, but the comparison between them and other hemostatic measures is not clear. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.