ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation (HTR) for stroke survivors.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Joanna Briggs Institute Library, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on HTR for stroke survivors from inception to January 1st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 793 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: after 1 to 2 years of treatment, BI scores (MD=20.22, 95%CI 17.10 to 23.35, P<0.000 01) in HTR group were higher than those in the traditional rehabilitation group. However, there were no statistical differences between two groups in ARAT scores (SMD=0.16, 95%CI −0.14 to 0.45, P=0.30) after 1 to 2 months of treatment, as well as MBI scores (SMD=0.98, 95%CI −0.33 to 2.29, P=0.14) and FMA scores (SMD=0.57, 95%CI −0.08 to 1.23, P=0.09) after 3 months of treatment, and CSI scores (MD=−1.48, 95%CI −3.90 to 0.94, P=0.23) and BBS scores (MD=1.33, 95%CI −1.15 to 3.81, P=0.29) after 6 months of treatment. The results of descriptive analysis indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in quality of life between the two groups at 6 months after intervention. However, the HTR group was superior to the traditional rehabilitation group after 2 years of treatment.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with traditional rehabilitation, long-term intervention (1-2 years) with HTR can improve the ability to perform activities of daily living and quality of life of stroke survivors. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusion.