Objective To evaluate the immediate and mid-term effectiveness of hybrid procedures (combined open surgery and endovascular therapy) for multilerel femoral and popliteal artery occlusive disease. Methods Between June 2009 and June 2012, 22 cases of severe femoral and popliteal artery occlusive disease were treated by hybrid surgery. There were 15 men and 7 women with an age range of 52-78 years (mean, 66.2 years) and with a disease duration of 6 months to 5 years (mean, 1.5 years). Of 22 patients, 13 had a history of smoking; 8 were classified as Fontaine III and 14 as Fontaine IV. The complications included diabetes (8 patients), hypertension (16 patients), hyperlipemia (10 patients), coronary heart disease (11 patients), and chronic kidney failure (1 patient). Patency analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier life tables and log-rank test. Results All patients underwent successfully procedures. The time of operation was 70-160 minutes (mean, 137 minutes). Acute myocardial infarction, hematoma of incision, fracture of stent, and stent thrombosis occurred in 1 case, respectively. At 6 months after surgery, the ankle brachial index (ABI), the transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcpO2), and the average intermittent claudication distance were significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones [0.79 ± 0.33 vs. 0.32 ± 0.18, (42.7 ± 15.7) kPa vs. (17.6 ± 11.6) kPa, and (420 ± 80) m vs. (160 ± 54) m, P lt; 0.05]. The patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 14.5 months). The primary patency rate, primary assisted patency rate, and second patency rate were 77.3% (17/22), 90.9% (20/22), and 95.5% (21/22) respectively, showing no significant difference among them (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in various-stage patency rates between patients at Fontaine III and IV (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Hybrid procedures provide an effective treatment of multilevel femoral artery and popliteal artery disease while there is good outflow.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-and long-term results of hybrid procedures in the treatment for aortic arch lesions. MethodsFrom October 2002 to March 2011, 28 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections involving the aortic arch were treated with hybrid endovascular treatment in our center. Twenty-two males and 6 females were in the series. The mean age of the patients was 68 years old. Of 28 patients, 15 were atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms and 13 were thoracic aortic dissection. Follow-up protocol consisted of computed tomography (CT) angiograms or ultrasound was performed in 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. The main goal was to evaluate the operative mortality, morbidity, and the longterm survival of these patients. ResultsHybrid procedures included 12 totalarch transpositions, 3 left common carotid artery (LCCA)left subclavian artery (LSA) bypass, 11 right common carotid artery (RCCA)LCCA-LSA bypass, 2 RCCA-LCCA bypass. The technical success rate was 92.9% (26/28). The complications occurred in 10 patients (35.7%). Operative mortality was 7.1% (2/28). The apoplexia rate was 7.1% (2/28). The time of followup was (36±3) months. The patency rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 100%, 92.9% (26/28), and 85.7% (24/28), respectively. The survival rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 89.3% (25/28), 71.4% (20/28), and 60.7% (17/28), respectively. ConclusionsThe short-and long-term results with hybrid procedures in the treatment for aortic arch diseases are satisfactory. Further reducing the complications is the key to increase the survival rate.