Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of Zhibitai vs. atorvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about Zhibitai vs. atorvastatin for hyperlipidemia were electronically retrieved in databases of PubMed, CENTRAL (Issue 7, 2010), CBM,CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to July, 2012. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 519 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed, Zhibitai was superior to atorvastatin in reducing TG levels after 8-week treatment (MD= −0.12, 95%CI −0.23 to −0.01, P=0.03) and increasing HDL-C levels after 8-week treatment (MD= −0.16, 95%CI −0.22 to −0.11, P=0.000 01). But there was no significant difference in decreasing TC levels and LDL-C levels after 4-week treatment and 8-week treatment as well as decreasing TG levels after 4-week treatment between the two groups. No obvious adverse reaction occurred in the two groups, but atorvastatin may impair liver function. Conclusion Current evidence with weak strength shows that, Zhibitai is superior to atorvastatin in reducing TG levels, and increasing HDL-C levels after 8 weeks. However, they are alike in other blood-fat index and safety. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of probucol for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) with hyperlipidemia. Methods Fifty-two patients (104 eyes) of NPDR with hyperlipidemia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 26 patients (52 eyes) in each group. Both groups received diet and exercise guidance, oral hypoglycemic agents and (or) intensive insulin therapy. After blood sugar and blood pressure were controlled, the treatment group received probucol 0.5 g, two times per day; and the control group received atorvastatin of 10 mg, one time per day. The total course was 12 months. Before and after one, three, six and 12 months, all patients underwent vision, ophthalmoscope, fundus fluorescein angiography, blood and urine tested. Variations of visual acuity, fundus condition, macular edema, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) and 8-0HdG were observed before and after treatment. Results The total effective rate of visual prognosis were 44.23% and 40.38% in the treatment group and the control group, the difference had no statistical significacy (Z=-0.335, P＞0.05). Retinal hemorrhages and microaneurysms alleviated after treatment in both groups.The total efficiency of fundus prognosis was 65.38% in the treatment group and 36.54% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.973,P＜0.05). Macular edema was in six and five eyes in the treatment group and the control group respectively, which were lower than before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (chi;2=4.833, 4.300;P＜0.05). Between the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (chi;2=0.102,P＞0.05). Twelve months after treatment, TG, TC and LDLC were decreased in the treatment group (t=15.653, 7.634, 14.871) and control group (t=13.275, 7.415, 13.632), and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). HDLC showed no significant difference than before in the two groups (t=0.584, 0.275;P＞0.05). TG, TC, LDLC and HDLC showed no difference between the two groups (t=1.857, 0.133, 1.671, 0.875;P＞0.05). 8-0HdG decreased gradually during the one, three, six and 12 months in the treatment group (t=7.352,15.581, 27.324, 28.143) and control group (t=6.877, 8.672, 14.671, 14.855) after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). In the first month after treatment, 8-0HdG showed no difference between the two groups (t=0.513,P＞0.05). In the 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, the 8-0HdG was lower in the treatment group than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.434, 5.917, 5.226;P＜0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of NPDR with hyperlipidemia, probucol can reduce blood lipid, stable visual function and relieve macular edema.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Xuezhikang capsule (XZK) for hyperlipidemia. Methods MEDIINE，EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CCTR), Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group data bank, and Chinese Biomedical Database(CBM), China Hospital Knowledge Database(CHKD) were searched，and the published/unpublished information was handsearched (updated to Dec., 2005) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCT of XZK versus statins or other lipid lowering drugs in treating hyperlipidemia patients. The quality evaluation, data extraction and analysis were conducted by the method recommended in Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.2.2. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (Version 4.2). Results Eleven trials (conducted in China) were identified, including 1 073 patients with hyperlipidemia met the inclusion criteria. All the included RCTs were graded as B or C. ① The effect of XZK in reducing TC: There were no significant differences between XZK and statins ( WMD 0.06, 95%CI-0.09 to 0.20 and RR1.02, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.12), XZK and fibrates (WMD 0.05, 95%CI -0.22 to 0.31) and XZK and probucol(WMD 0.42, 95%CI -0.01 to 0.85). XZK was superior to hexanicit (WMD 0.96, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.18). ② The effect of XZK in reducing TG: XZK had the same effect as statins (WMD 0.02, 95%CI -0.10 to 0.14 and RR 1.17, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.49) and hexanicit (WMD 0.28, 95%CI -0.17 to 0.73 ).Meanwhile, XZK was superior to probucol (WMD 0.71, 95%CI 0.22 to 1.20), but it was not as good as fibrates (WMD -0.81, 95%CI -1.40 to -0.23). ③ The effect of XZK in increasing HDL-C：XZK had the same effect as that of statins (WMD -0.03, 95%CI -0.10 to 0.04 and RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.33). The effect of XZK was better than that of hexanicit (WMD 0.15, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.29). XZK had the same effect of fibrates (WMD 0.03, 95%CI -0.08 to 0.15) and probucol (WMD 0.04, 95%CI -0.16 to 0.24). ④ The effect of XZK in reducing LDL-C：The effects of XZK and statins were the same (WMD -0.23, 95%CI -0.61 to 0.15 and RR 1.15, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.77). The effect of XZK was better than that of hexanicit (WMD 0.53, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.90). Meanwhile, XZK had the same effect as those of fibrates (WMD 0.19, 95%CI -0.12 to 0.50) and probucol (WMD 0.35, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.73). ⑤ The adverse reactions of XZK were mainly the gastrointestinal tract reaction, while liver function abnormality and myalgia were scarcely found. Conclusion Xuezhikang capsule have the same effects as those of statins in reducing the levels of TC, TG, LDL-C and raising HDL-C in patients with hyperlipidemia. No obvious adverse reactions are found during the short-term treatment. But further confirmation with clinical randomized controlled trials of high quality, large sample and long-term follow-up is needed.
Objective To compare two ways of establishing hyperlipidemia model in rats with fat emulsion.Methods Thirty male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups， which fed with normal diet （normal control group）， low concentration fat emulsion （low concentration fat emulsion group）， and high concentration fat emulsion （high concentration fat emulsion group）， respectively. All the rats were sacrificed and tested for serum total cholesterol （TC）， triglyceride （TG）， high density lipoprotein-cholesterol （HDL-C）， and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol （LDL-C）in two weeks after establishment. Results The levels of TC， TG， HDL-C， and LDL-C in the high concentration fat emulsion group were significantly higher than those in the normal control group and the low concentration fat emulsion group （P＜0.05）；the levels of TC， TG， and HDL-C in the low concentration fat emulsion group didn’t significantly differ from normal control group （P＞0.05）. Conclusions High concentration fat emulsion can be used to establish hyperlipidemia model in SD rats， low concentration fat emulsion is not suitable for establishing hyperlipidemia model in SD rats.
ObjectTo observe the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of atorvastatin and JiangZhi Decoction (ZJD) for primary hyperlipidemia (Tan Zhuo Zu E Zheng) and to analyze the interactions of drugs in hypolipidemic effect. MethodsA 2*2 factorial design, single-blind, stratified randomized controlled trial according to the level of lipid was conducted. Primary hyperlipidemia (Tan Zhuo Zu E Zheng) patients met the inclusion criteria were divided into 5 groups:ATV 10 mg group (group A), ATV 20 mg group (group B), ATV 10 mg+JZD group (group C), ATV 20 mg+JZD group (group D), JZD group (group E). After two weeks treatment, the efficacy and safety among the 5 groups were compared. ResultsA total of 92 patients were included, of which, 20 were in group A, 25 in group B, 21 in group C, 17 in group D, and 9 in group E. The results showed that:(1) There was no significant difference between group C and group B in the reduction of serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (PTC=0.226, PLDL-C=0.818). (2) The results of 2*2 factorial analysis showed that, there was no significant interaction between TCM factor and western medicine factor (PTC=0.605, PLDL-C=0.843). (3) There were no significant differences in safety outcomes among 5 groups (all P values >0.05). ConclusionATV 10 mg+JZD and ATV 20 mg have a similar efficacy in reducing TC and LDL-C. There is no obvious interaction between JZD and ATV in hypolipidemic effect, and the combination therapy of ATV and JZD is safe.
Objective To study the clinical protective effect of hemoperfusion combined with hemofiltration on inflammatory reaction of hyperlipidemia severe acute pancreatitis (HLSAP). Methods Thirty-seven patients with HLSAP treated between January 2012 and December 2014 were selected and divided into three groups based on different treatments. Thirteen patients were allocated into hemoperfusion combined with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration group (HP+CVVH group) and treated with hemoperfusion combined with hemofiltration; 11 patients were allocated into continuous veno-venous hemofiltration group (CVVH group) and treated with hemofiltration; and all the other patients were allocated into control group and treated with conventional treatment. The levels of blood triglyceride, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE)Ⅱ score of the patients after treatment were observed. The hospital stay, organ dysfunction rate and mortality of the patients were measured. Results Compared with the control group, the levels of blood triglyceride, C-reactive protein, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and APACHE Ⅱ score of the patients in the HP+CVVH group and CVVH group were both significantly reduced 72 hours after therapy (P<0.05). However, the levels of blood triglyceride, C-reactive protein, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and APACHE Ⅱ score of the patients in the HP+CVVH group were significantly lower than those in the CVVH group at the same time point (P<0.05). The hospital stay of the patients in the HP+CVVH group and CVVH group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the CVVH group, the hospital stay of patients in the HP+CVVH group was significantly shorter (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in organ dysfunction rate and mortality among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Hemoperfusion combined with hemofiltration is an effective method for HLSAP by cleaning the inflammatory mediators availably and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory reaction.
In recent years, the incidence of hyperlipidemia acute pancreatitis (HLAP) has been increasing year by year, but its pathogenesis has not been completely clear. There are many clinical treatment methods for HLAP, such as lipid-lowering drugs, low molecular weight heparin, insulin, and plasma exchange. Actively reducing serum triglyceride is the core of treatment. Plasma exchange can quickly and effectively reduce the level of triglyceride, and its application in the treatment of HLAP is gradually increasing. This article reviews the recent advances in the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of HLAP, focusing on the mechanism, indications, timing, and disadvantages of plasma exchange therapy for HLAP.
ObjectiveTo use the evidence map system to search and sort out the clinical research on the prevention and treatment of hyperlipidemia with proprietary Chinese medicine, and to understand the distribution of evidence in this field. MethodsThe literature on the treatment of hyperlipidemia with proprietary Chinese medicines was retrieved from CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2022. The distribution characteristics of evidence were analyzed and presented by means of text and graph. ResultsA total of 865 articles were included and 79 kinds of proprietary Chinese medicines were obtained. The Xuezhikang tablets or capsules were the most frequently used. In recent years, the number of published articles showed a downward trend, and the literature quality was generally low. Most of the research intervention programs only used Chinese patent medicine, and the sample size of a single study was mostly 60-100 patients, and the study course was 4-8 weeks. Clinical studies did not highlight the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine, and only 12.7% of the studies limited the syndrome type of traditional Chinese medicine in the study population. In terms of the selection of outcome indicators, more attention was paid to blood lipid levels and safety indicators, while less attention was paid to indicators such as traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores. ConclusionThe results show that Chinese patent medicine has certain advantages in the prevention and treatment of hyperlipidemia, but there are some deficiencies in the reports of methodology and clinical characteristics, and the overall quality of the research is low.